Sautrantika itself is མདོ་སྡེ་པ་ : Dodepa = 經部宗 (?) [Jingbu Zong?]
Sautrantika Following Scripture = ལུང་གི་རྗེས་འབྲང་གི་མདོ་སྡེ་པ : lung gi jé drang gi do dé pa : <Chinese?> : <Sanskrit?>
Sautrantika Following Reason/Logic = རིགས-པའི་རྗེས-འབྲང-གི་མདོ-སྡེ-པ : rik pé jé drang gi do dé pa : <Chinese?> : <Sanskrit?>
What are the Chinese and Sanskrit for the full terms "Sautrantika Following Scripture" and "Sautrantika Following Reason/Logic" ? Or are these terms wholly Tibetan designations without Chinese and Sanskrit analogues?
How did Vasubandhu distinguish the two types of Sautrantikas in the Abhidharmakośakārikā and other texts?
Thanks!
Sautrantika Following Scripture/Reason Tibetan/Sanskrit/Chinese
Sautrantika Following Scripture/Reason Tibetan/Sanskrit/Chinese
“Where do atomic bombs come from?”
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Zen Master Seung Sahn said, “That’s simple. Atomic bombs come from the mind that likes this and doesn’t like that.”
"Even if you practice only for an hour a day with faith and inspiration, good qualities will steadily increase. Regular practice makes it easy to transform your mind. From seeing only relative truth, you will eventually reach a profound certainty in the meaning of absolute truth."
Kyabje Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche.
"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche
Re: Sautrantika Following Scripture/Reason Tibetan/Sanskrit/Chinese
These are wholly Tibetan categories,
Vasubandhi discussess two types of Sautrantikas in the Kośa: Sautrantikas proper, and Darshantikas, to whom it is likely Tibetans classified as those following reason, i.e., Dharmakīrti, et al.