Oops. I meant aspirated. I've heard various pronunciations, but thanks I'll work with this.
More Tibetan pronunciation
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
You can try pronouncing English "pizza" and "Pete's house" to hear the difference between /ts/ and aspirated /tsh/.
-
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:54 am
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
It seems I stand corrected! I guess linguistics just makes me grumpy.nyamlae wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 5:51 amIt's how I learned how to speak!SilenceMonkey wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 4:11 am You guys are making this way too complicated. Just work with someone virtually or in person. All this explanation is very abstract and academic. That’s not how people actually learn how to speak.
That’s actually a good one!
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
So now I'm looking for the most accurate IPA equivalents for the Tibetan consonants. After some searches I found this list:
Letter/Name/IPA
ཀ ka /ka/
ཁ Ka /kʰa̤/
ག ga /ɡa/
ང n̰a /ŋa/
ཅ ca /tɕa/
ཆ Ca /tɕʰa̤/
ཇ ja /dʑa/
ཉ ña /ɲa/
ཏ ta /ta/
ཐ Ta /tʰa̤/
ད da /da/
ན na /na/
པ pa /pa/
ཕ Pa /pʰa̤/
བ ba /ba/
མ ma /ma/
ཙ tsa /tsa/
ཚ TSa /tsʰa̤/
ཛ dza /dza/
ཝ wa /wa/
ཞ ža /ʒa/
ཟ za /za/
འ 'a /ʔ̬a/
ཡ ya /ja/
ར ra /ra/
ལ la /la/
ཤ ša /ʃa/
ས sa /sa/
ཧ ha /ha̤/
ཨ a /a/
Source: https://polyglotclub.com/wiki/Language/ ... Consonants
Is this accurate or is there a better source either online or elsewhere?
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
The actual IPA values in the list are generally accurate, except that they give the voiced versions, whereas Lhasa Tibetan has low tone aspirated.
Like ཅ ca /tɕa/ should be this symbol, this is accurate, it is like the same sound in Japanese ち, NOT the same as English or even Sanskrit /tʃ/ in "chair" "Chandra" etc. This is not about aspiration, but the quality of consonant.
However, this is not that important. People can still understand you if you pronounce it like /tʃ/.
One inaccuracy is that ཤ should be /ɕ/, same consonant as pinyin "X" or Japanese し. Again this is not a major point though.
Like ཅ ca /tɕa/ should be this symbol, this is accurate, it is like the same sound in Japanese ち, NOT the same as English or even Sanskrit /tʃ/ in "chair" "Chandra" etc. This is not about aspiration, but the quality of consonant.
However, this is not that important. People can still understand you if you pronounce it like /tʃ/.
One inaccuracy is that ཤ should be /ɕ/, same consonant as pinyin "X" or Japanese し. Again this is not a major point though.
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
Thanks for checking this. As ཅ ca /tɕa is exactly what is written in the list, what tells you that they are giving the voiced versions? Could you give an example of how the low tone aspirated version is written?MiphamFan wrote: ↑Sat May 13, 2023 12:00 pm The actual IPA values in the list are generally accurate, except that they give the voiced versions, whereas Lhasa Tibetan has low tone aspirated.
Like ཅ ca /tɕa/ should be this symbol, this is accurate, it is like the same sound in Japanese ち, NOT the same as English or even Sanskrit /tʃ/ in "chair" "Chandra" etc. This is not about aspiration, but the quality of consonant.
However, this is not that important. People can still understand you if you pronounce it like /tʃ/.
One inaccuracy is that ཤ should be /ɕ/, same consonant as pinyin "X" or Japanese し. Again this is not a major point though.
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
/tɕʰa/ low tone aspirated.
What tells me they are giving the voiced versions is they write /b/ /d/ /g/ etc instead of having the aspirated versions.
It is the same consonant in Chinese "qi", indicated by Pinyin Q.
What tells me they are giving the voiced versions is they write /b/ /d/ /g/ etc instead of having the aspirated versions.
It is the same consonant in Chinese "qi", indicated by Pinyin Q.
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
I'm adding a link here to another recent DW discussion about Tibetan pronunciation https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?p=659271 , which wasn't posted in the Language forum and might be hard to find in the future. It also contains some useful resources and comments.
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
I'd be interested to know what the view is on the Tibetan pronunciation in the sound files accompanying this Quizlet set https://quizlet.com/class/2968854/. It's the only set I've come across that includes sound. Is the pronunciation close to the central Tibetan dialect or have other influences crept in?
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
Sounds like standard Exile Tibetan to me, based on the Lhasa dialect.Punya wrote: ↑Wed May 31, 2023 4:58 am I'd be interested to know what the view is on the Tibetan pronunciation in the sound files accompanying this Quizlet set https://quizlet.com/class/2968854/. It's the only set I've come across that includes sound. Is the pronunciation close to the central Tibetan dialect or have other influences crept in?
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
Thanks! That's good to know.

In case anyone is interested, this Quizlet set forms part of the free Introduction to Classical Tibetan course based at the University of Toronto http://www.nettletibetan.ca/introductio ... al-tibetan.
We abide nowhere. We possess nothing.
~Chatral Rinpoche
~Chatral Rinpoche
Re: More Tibetan pronunciation
A little late to the conversation, but yes finding a native speaker in Central (Lhasa) dialect would be invaluable.
Additionally, there are presentations of how each row (and isolated each column) demonstrates guttural, palatal, dental, and labial sounds. The exceptions (outliers) are retroflex and pre-nasal. Understanding, theoretically the execution of these and finding examples that native speakers can provide are invaluable. Shortcut, there are many, many videos on YouTube and sound bites, etc... on the web in general.
Shaun
Additionally, there are presentations of how each row (and isolated each column) demonstrates guttural, palatal, dental, and labial sounds. The exceptions (outliers) are retroflex and pre-nasal. Understanding, theoretically the execution of these and finding examples that native speakers can provide are invaluable. Shortcut, there are many, many videos on YouTube and sound bites, etc... on the web in general.
Shaun
