Pabhongka Lamrim questionable claim

Forum for discussion of Tibetan Buddhism. Questions specific to one school are best posted in the appropriate sub-forum.
Post Reply
Toenail
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 10:06 am

Pabhongka Lamrim questionable claim

Post by Toenail »

Hello,

I am reading Pabhongkas Lamrim and in it he says that even if someone does negative wishes in front of buddha statues etc. they become a cause for enlightenment. The example he uses is the wish never to attain enlightenment (he does not mean the bodhisattvas wish to not attain enlightenment until samsara is emptied). He says that this is because of the
root-merit
of the action in front of a virtuos object.

How is this to be understood? This does not make sense to me. My idea of karma, cause and effect was that negative intentions can never lead to positive results. Just like an apple tree seed cannot yield potatoes.

Toenail
User avatar
Lobsang Chojor
Posts: 743
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:08 pm
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: Pabhongka Lamrim questionable claim

Post by Lobsang Chojor »

Which page is it from so I can look and hopefully help :D
"Morality does not become pure unless darkness is dispelled by the light of wisdom"
  • Aryasura, Paramitasamasa 6.5
ༀ་ཨ་ར་པ་ཙ་ན་དྷཱི༔ Oṃ A Ra Pa Ca Na Dhīḥ
User avatar
dzogchungpa
Posts: 6333
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm

Re: Pabhongka Lamrim questionable claim

Post by dzogchungpa »

I'm not recalling exactly now, but one does hear stories of insects biting great beings and then being reborn as their students or otherwise benefiting as a result. Something like that.
There is not only nothingness because there is always, and always can manifest. - Thinley Norbu Rinpoche
User avatar
Tsongkhapafan
Posts: 1236
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:36 am

Re: Pabhongka Lamrim questionable claim

Post by Tsongkhapafan »

It's a mixed action. Seeing holy objects such as Buddha statues, stupas, temples and other representations of the Three Jewels is a cause of enlightenment. It is like a tiny jewel that is swallowed and can never be corrupted by the impurity of the body. Similarly, seeing holy objects increases an indestructible imprint in our mind for enlightenment. We receive this benefit irrespective of our motivation.

However, if we perform a negative action in front of a representation of the Three Jewels, we will still incur negative karma as well commensurate with our motivation, the type of action, the object of the action, and so forth.

The benefit we receive from the holy object, then, is not due to our deluded or negative mind but due to the power of the holy object. For example, if we look at Buddha with an angry, disrespectful mind, we will receive an imprint or blessing from seeing a holy object but later we will also suffer due to the karma we created by our negative mind towards a holy object. This is why I say it's mixed karma.
javier.espinoza.t
Posts: 2008
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:29 am

Re: Pabhongka Lamrim questionable claim

Post by javier.espinoza.t »

Toenail wrote:Hello,

I am reading Pabhongkas Lamrim and in it he says that even if someone does negative wishes in front of buddha statues etc. they become a cause for enlightenment. The example he uses is the wish never to attain enlightenment (he does not mean the bodhisattvas wish to not attain enlightenment until samsara is emptied). He says that this is because of the
root-merit
of the action in front of a virtuos object.

How is this to be understood? This does not make sense to me. My idea of karma, cause and effect was that negative intentions can never lead to positive results. Just like an apple tree seed cannot yield potatoes.

Toenail
this is possible, but enlightenment comes in a far more extensive period of time compared to some who has a possitive relationship to buddhadharma.
User avatar
Karinos
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 3:40 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Pabhongka Lamrim questionable claim

Post by Karinos »

this is due to wishes of enlightened beings that whoever have good or bad karmic connections with them, should be enlightened in the same mandala
Schrödinger’s Yidam
Posts: 7370
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am

Re: Pabhongka Lamrim questionable claim

Post by Schrödinger’s Yidam »

Once when I took a Gelug HYT initiation the lama said, "Even if you end up in hell because of this initiation it is a great blessing."

Chew on that one for a while.
1.The problem isn’t ‘ignorance’. The problem is the mind you have right now. (H.H. Karmapa XVII @NYC 2/4/18)
2. I support Mingyur R and HHDL in their positions against lama abuse.
3. Student: Lama, I thought I might die but then I realized that the 3 Jewels would protect me.
Lama: Even If you had died the 3 Jewels would still have protected you. (DW post by Fortyeightvows)
Post Reply

Return to “Tibetan Buddhism”