Ayu wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:54 pm
Hazel wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 7:25 pm
Hello,
I am grumpy and irritable the vast majority of the time. At the very least I'm whining about something. It drives me nuts and likely the people around me as well.
What sort of practices and/or areas of study are good to work on to address this?
It's a pretty wretched feeling.
We always think, emotions affect the thoughts. But I heard from a Buddhist monk who was working and researching as psychologist as well, that it is different:
The thought is first, the emotion follows with delay.
He said, if you want to change your emotions, start with positive thinking.
Hmm, interesting food for thought and subject.
*Following are my own thoughts for the purpose of discussion, not meant as any kind of medical or treatment advice*
As far as I know there's no agreement in psychology whether thoughts or emotions come first, some say one, same say the other. I'm not sure there's a clear demarcation between the two, either. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy would say thoughts, but there is some real movement away from that kind of reductionist thinking these days, for good reason in my opinion.
My experience and view:
Meditation wise, I have gone as deep as I can for now and what I uncover subjectively is that there are subtle "thoughts", less rational and more related to emotion, kind of tonal things that are running in background most of the time, that I am mostly unaware of, I can gain some awareness of them with shamatha. They re subject-object thoughts, but very vague, sometimes I can see them right as sleep comes on. They are felt "in the body", and present as what most people would think of as emotions I believe. I thought of them as emotions at one time, but now I think that is not wuite accurate. There is a deeper level of clinging involved with these, again, this part is all purely subjective on my part, trying to describe something pretty subtle.
The issue with only-cognitive approaches (and this from a Western standpoint mostly, but I think likely backed up circumstantially by the Buddhist tradition) is that we are only really conscious of a small portion of the things we think, I have a hunch this is so even for very advanced meditators, but of course to less of a degree. This makes sense within a Buddhist framework, particularly with the notion of habit-energy; we have been thinking a certain way since beginningless time, our own cognition is mostly obscured to us, and that's the whole reason we are often so hard pressed to deal very well with it. It's a function of ignorance.
Emotional states like anger and anxiety operate on a level
which actually effects our cognition, i.e. alter our thinking and our meta-cognition (thoughts about thinking, basically). So, when we are in the grip of these, we can do all the cognitive strategies (positive thought, metta, etc.) and they may do nothing, mainly due to the fact that when our thinking is heavily altered by anger and anxiety, we literally cannot do them right. We might kind of recite them in our head, but our altered thinking will not allow them to have the same effect as they would if our anger or anxiety was below a certain threshold.
I think his is likely why stuff like CBT and other cognitive interventions don't have an amazing track record with trauma and PTSD, and some people are turning towards body-based interventions for this sort of thing.
That is not to say that the advice from the monk is wrong at all, cognitive responses are really important, but it seems to me that the person dealing with the anger has to figure out whether their emotional state is at a tame enough level for cognitive strategies to work in the first place, and what their anger is coming from, to some degree. Cognitive strategies can't always work, there are states where alteration of the thought process is not immediately possible. When it is low enough, working with thoughts is quite sensible.
Anxiety for example (which can be related to anger and irritability) literally functions as an evolutionary of narrowing the possibilities of thought by forcing a focus on a perceived threat, and all the bodily changes that go along with that. In the case of a real threat, it's a vital function, outside of that, it's a harmful state and (as anyone with anxiety or panic disorder can tell you) it's often very difficult if not impossbile to "think" one's way out of.
In terms of the pyscho physiological system, anger and anxiety are related, and cause many of the same bodily changes:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... y-interact
Again, in some ways this accords with the Buddhist view, in others, perhaps not. Either way though, dealing with heightened emotional states requires different approaches because sometimes the ..habit-energy I'll call it is much stronger than the thoughts we can muster in response.
There is also a parallel argument to be had here within the Buddhist world of Buddhist practice between trying to use antidotes to the kleshas, and simply learning methods of letting them release themselves. The people who I have taken teachings on the this subject from (some traditional, some in both the worlds of psychology and Buddhism) advocated having a handful of different approaches at hand.
"...if you think about how many hours, months and years of your life you've spent looking at things, being fascinated by things that have now passed away, then how wonderful to spend even five minutes looking into the nature of your own mind."
-James Low