Karma Dorje wrote:username wrote:ChNNR said today using other cultures/religions as secondary support material is OK but not as the main (dominant) point of view and that mixing up things into a(n ecclectic) mix is like the famous "Milanese Soup" where you throw in whatever ideology into the pot which he said is not his teaching at all. So obviously this thread is becoming the same chaotic state as I do not think his quote "I want to save my culture" as justified earlier here can be used as a correct analogy for the need to save French/Amercian culture which are not in imminent danger like Tibet's AFAIK. This is another false analogy.
But hey, don't listen to me, knock yourself out.
As they say "Bon weekend"

Who suggested mixing stuff up? Are you being purposefully obtuse? I specifically said that this is *not* about saving Western culture but about the inevitable changes that will come when "Tibetan" Buddhism is fully instantiated here. I didn't once bring up what ChNNR said about his culture. I wish him well in the endeavor.
Instead of concern trolling, perhaps you could stop putting words in the mouths of others and address what was actually said.
without an attempt to pour gasoline on this. i can understand peoples reservations about this. again, as a secondary example, since i am not tibetan, or have been to tibet. my points were exactly about "saving" culture, two primary examples are, and one i've already emphasized is the native north american one, another one is the Metis example, which IS a french/native cross over that was threatened from English colonization. Both of those two culture have been, and are currently working towards "saving" their cultures, that is NO different than saving Tibetan culture and perhaps, all cultures who are dealing with having to try to "keep their cultural roots" can learn from the others that are having trouble.
to analogize "american/french" limits the reality. one can use examples of other aspects of culture, like the fishing cultures that have been devastated by past oil spills and leaks into the waters. entire communities had to move and people lively-hoods were lost. or what about the plight of the polar bear? who's responsible for that? is it oil companies or those that use those resources or both? again, that can be debated, i'm just offering examples.
what's important is that people don't get over aggressive in their attempts! history has proven to be a good indicator of what happens when people hold onto views so strongly. *in the 2nd edit* which, for all intense and purposes can be considered a form of pride, right?
anyways.
take care
breath well

*first edit - i think i'll grab a kingfisher from the refridgerator!