Practicing without empowerment
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17092
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: Practicing without empowerment
Not sure I understand what you're asking but here's my basic take based on what I've learned and been taught, any mistake is my own:
Any statements that involve comparison, separation, etc. are relative truth, by definition. There is much less you can accruately say about ultimate truth, and that's why methods to understand it tend to involve exhausting the possibilities of conceptual thinking - of relative truth- for example Madhyamaka analysis or a Koan.
The Two Truths is not just some philosophical position, , it is praxis for moving past concepts.
Any statements that involve comparison, separation, etc. are relative truth, by definition. There is much less you can accruately say about ultimate truth, and that's why methods to understand it tend to involve exhausting the possibilities of conceptual thinking - of relative truth- for example Madhyamaka analysis or a Koan.
The Two Truths is not just some philosophical position, , it is praxis for moving past concepts.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Re: Practicing without empowerment
What the member says in the post I was quoting from was not referring to the Two Truths I think,he refers to having received Empowerments from The Absolute which in some way lead the person receiving back to The Absolute.Johnny Dangerous wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:45 pmI get what you are saying here, but terms like "ultimate" or "absolute" are used plenty in Buddhist circles to describe and talk about one of the two truths. They aren't made into a monad or reified (or at least shouldn't be), but they are pretty common. A newer person might not even be able to make the distinction, it requires some study time, especially if one is not particularly inclined towards this kind of thought (I know I'm not).Giovanni wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:54 am With all good wishes you need to study some basic Buddhadharma. You would not then use terms like The Absolute which the Buddha explained carefully are not compatible with his Dharma.
We live in difficult and confusing times. There is a temptation to create our own dharma in place of the Buddhas Dharma. So we take some New Age sentiments and we mix with a little Nichiren and Pure Land then we read about Vajrayana so we take a Tibetan name. I did this too, although I have never had interest at all in Nicherin, but I mixed and wanted all to be happy.
In the end I knew I had to take a vehicle and practice it. And to remove my own interpretation to see what was being said really.
Of course, even a Shentongpa might shy away from talking about something like "The Absolute", this is more about how words are used than the words themselves.
In general I agree, it is very easy in Buddhism to find all this cool, shiny stuff and to ignore the basics. The shiny stuff is (in my personal experience) incomprehensible without the basics.
Now I may have misunderstood. but that sounds to me like some kind of Theistic belief. It becomes more a problem when we look at some other posts from the same person which seem to show a need to hold on to an idea of an atman of some kind. Which can carry over from birth to birth.
I appreciate the desire for tolerance to other faiths but I think this does not help us understand Buddhadharma.
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17092
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: Practicing without empowerment
Yes, I agree with this part. Like I said, in my personal experience slowly and patiently learning and refining basic Buddhist concepts is an important foundation for studying Zen, Vajrayana, Dzogchen, or any teaching that is based on direct experience, otherwise you can take things in all kinds of haphazard directions. Even in terms of basic cultural conditioning, many of us have a default set of "spiritual" ideas that in the end are not compatible with what we will learn in Buddhism. It does require us to "empty the cup" some, and to be prepared to be challenged.Giovanni wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 7:29 pmWhat the member says in the post I was quoting from was not referring to the Two Truths I think,he refers to having received Empowerments from The Absolute which in some way lead the person receiving back to The Absolute.Johnny Dangerous wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:45 pmI get what you are saying here, but terms like "ultimate" or "absolute" are used plenty in Buddhist circles to describe and talk about one of the two truths. They aren't made into a monad or reified (or at least shouldn't be), but they are pretty common. A newer person might not even be able to make the distinction, it requires some study time, especially if one is not particularly inclined towards this kind of thought (I know I'm not).Giovanni wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:54 am With all good wishes you need to study some basic Buddhadharma. You would not then use terms like The Absolute which the Buddha explained carefully are not compatible with his Dharma.
We live in difficult and confusing times. There is a temptation to create our own dharma in place of the Buddhas Dharma. So we take some New Age sentiments and we mix with a little Nichiren and Pure Land then we read about Vajrayana so we take a Tibetan name. I did this too, although I have never had interest at all in Nicherin, but I mixed and wanted all to be happy.
In the end I knew I had to take a vehicle and practice it. And to remove my own interpretation to see what was being said really.
Of course, even a Shentongpa might shy away from talking about something like "The Absolute", this is more about how words are used than the words themselves.
In general I agree, it is very easy in Buddhism to find all this cool, shiny stuff and to ignore the basics. The shiny stuff is (in my personal experience) incomprehensible without the basics.
Now I may have misunderstood. but that sounds to me like some kind of Theistic belief. It becomes more a problem when we look at some other posts from the same person which seem to show a need to hold on to an idea of an atman of some kind. Which can carry over from birth to birth.
I appreciate the desire for tolerance to other faiths but I think this does not help us understand Buddhadharma.
I think there is a distinction to be made here, starting from a "default" place where we have ideas like that is not really the problem, the problem is continuing to think in that way when we have a choice to step out of it. Buddhadharma in a large way is shifting our cognitive process on the deepest level possible. Some people really are drawn towards eternalism, and some are drawn the other direction. If someone has a good teacher they will be diligently led to abandon both of these habits on a daily basis, and over time we lose the habit of living and thinking through the lens of these polarities.
Also let's be fair here: There are lots of people raised with Buddhism who hold to ideas that drift to the eternalist side of things, if anything our culture often has the opposite tendency.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Re: Practicing without empowerment
Certainly that is so. And to be full of enthusiasm and goodwill is always a good thing. We are all making our way like men in the dark feeling for a wall. Teachers are a great blessing. They can throw a switch for lights to come on when we are ready to listen to them. We have so many ideas..we all do this
Re: Practicing without empowerment
You’re both a great Blessing.
Om Mani Padme Hum.
Om Mani Padme Hum.
Re: Practicing without empowerment
So was Atisha's tea boy
Happy Pride month to my queer dharma siblings!
What do you see when you turn out the lights?
What do you see when you turn out the lights?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2023 9:01 pm
Re: Practicing without empowerment
It's very disappointing that so many have forgotten shakyamuni's teachings on the counterproductivity of ritualism. Empowerments are symbolic, meant to give a baseline understanding of a particular tantra. It's not some magical permission from a diety. It is the clarity, the awoken Buddha nature, required to understand and effectively accomplish what you practice. Claiming Empowerment is always required for a certain practice, full stop, is ignorance. They are not required, especially by beings of advanced karmic potential from birth. If you have the ability to complete the practice accurately, Empowerment is redundant. However, for the overwhelming majority of cases, the practice will not be successful without it. We must not regress to simply parrotting teachings we misunderstand, especially without firsthand experience.
- conebeckham
- Posts: 5714
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:49 pm
- Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Re: Practicing without empowerment
So you say. I will stick with the words of my teachers. Empowerment is an essential prerequisite.Kieltiel871 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 9:23 pm It's very disappointing that so many have forgotten shakyamuni's teachings on the counterproductivity of ritualism. Empowerments are symbolic, meant to give a baseline understanding of a particular tantra. It's not some magical permission from a diety. It is the clarity, the awoken Buddha nature, required to understand and effectively accomplish what you practice. Claiming Empowerment is always required for a certain practice, full stop, is ignorance. They are not required, especially by beings of advanced karmic potential from birth. If you have the ability to complete the practice accurately, Empowerment is redundant. However, for the overwhelming majority of cases, the practice will not be successful without it. We must not regress to simply parrotting teachings we misunderstand, especially without firsthand experience.
དམ་པའི་དོན་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ཆེ་བ་དང་།
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
རྟོག་གེའི་ཡུལ་མིན་བླ་མའི་བྱིན་རླབས་དང་།
སྐལ་ལྡན་ལས་འཕྲོ་ཅན་གྱིས་རྟོགས་པ་སྟེ།
དེ་ནི་ཤེས་རབ་ལ་ནི་ལོ་རྟོག་སེལ།།
"Absolute Truth is not an object of analytical discourse or great discriminating wisdom,
It is realized through the blessing grace of the Guru and fortunate Karmic potential.
Like this, mistaken ideas of discriminating wisdom are clarified."
- (Kyabje Bokar Rinpoche, from his summary of "The Ocean of Definitive Meaning")
Re: Practicing without empowerment
Fortunately, there are beings of "advanced karmic potential" (like you) around here to set things straight.Kieltiel871 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 9:23 pm It's very disappointing that so many have forgotten shakyamuni's teachings on the counterproductivity of ritualism. Empowerments are symbolic, meant to give a baseline understanding of a particular tantra. It's not some magical permission from a diety. It is the clarity, the awoken Buddha nature, required to understand and effectively accomplish what you practice. Claiming Empowerment is always required for a certain practice, full stop, is ignorance. They are not required, especially by beings of advanced karmic potential from birth. If you have the ability to complete the practice accurately, Empowerment is redundant. However, for the overwhelming majority of cases, the practice will not be successful without it. We must not regress to simply parrotting teachings we misunderstand, especially without firsthand experience.
Re: Practicing without empowerment
If anyone views empowerment as simply some forns of permission to do tantric practices, only offer a baseline understanding, etc and therefore is redundant, he/she is simply advocating wrong views while ignoring what various tantras have to say on that subject.
Life is like a game, either you win or lose!
Life is like a fight, either you live or die!
Life is like a show, either you laugh or cry!
Life is like a dream, either you know or not!!!
Life is like a fight, either you live or die!
Life is like a show, either you laugh or cry!
Life is like a dream, either you know or not!!!
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17092
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: Practicing without empowerment
Based on what? Your opinion? Sorry but precedent of traditio, scripture and explanations from teachers are more reliable than just having an opinion about how people should or shouldn’t be.Kieltiel871 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 9:23 pm It's very disappointing that so many have forgotten shakyamuni's teachings on the counterproductivity of ritualism. Empowerments are symbolic, meant to give a baseline understanding of a particular tantra. It's not some magical permission from a diety. It is the clarity, the awoken Buddha nature, required to understand and effectively accomplish what you practice. Claiming Empowerment is always required for a certain practice, full stop, is ignorance. They are not required, especially by beings of advanced karmic potential from birth. If you have the ability to complete the practice accurately, Empowerment is redundant. However, for the overwhelming majority of cases, the practice will not be successful without it. We must not regress to simply parrotting teachings we misunderstand, especially without firsthand experience.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Re: Practicing without empowerment
If this is your understanding of the function of empowerment in Vajrayana, then sadly you have missed the mark completely. No wonder you think empowerments are just ritualism.Kieltiel871 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 9:23 pm Empowerments are symbolic, meant to give a baseline understanding of a particular tantra.
Where did you get this understanding from?Kieltiel871 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 9:23 pm It's very disappointing that so many have forgotten shakyamuni's teachings on the counterproductivity of ritualism.
Buddha never said that at all. It is the attachment to rites and rituals that must be abandoned. You can still do rites and rituals without having attachments to it.
Further, this is coming from sutra teachings and you conflate it with tantra teachings and method.