Lhasa wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:23 amYou got it!!dzogchungpa wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:20 am
In all seriousness, I think the lion's share of the credit should go to me for having started the thread.![]()


Lhasa wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:23 amYou got it!!dzogchungpa wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:20 am
In all seriousness, I think the lion's share of the credit should go to me for having started the thread.![]()
I wasn't really trying to make a point....just to correct a misunderstanding...
Well.... i haven't been convinced yet that she is a total fraud. I wish i could just know the absolute truth. If someone has experience and knowledge of this subject they could prove to me one way or another. And i could accept that.
PeterC wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:33 am Honestly, what do you think climate scientists - and not just them, a whole ecosystem of people working on remediation technologies, sustainability, recycling, even geoengineering - spend their time doing? Do you have much knowledge yourself of what they work on? These are in many cases highly specialized careers that require decades of study to make a contribution, and many of the people working in these fields are academic researchers who really don't get paid much and get very little recognition for their work. How do you think they would feel if they read comments like this?
What got me in her post which is now taken down was she equivocated any criticism of her recognition as a Buddha as being a result of underlying white supremacy. As if there isn't a plentitude of genuine reasons not remotely related to racism why her claim to being the first female Buddha in modern history might be questionable. She took that post down, so maybe she had a moment of reflection.Malcolm wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 10:25 pmUmmm, there is only one person reporting this, herself, and given her other statements online which clearly show she has no understanding at all of what Tibetan Buddhism is and what "emanation" means...well, you put two and two together. After all, what do we know, we are just a bunch of white colonial oppressors trying to keep the indigenous people down...Kunga Lhadzom wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 9:12 pmYet.. SHE had the KARMA to meet him, and discuss their dreams ....and HE was convinced enough that SHE IS THE emanation of Mamaki...and took ONE year to prepare for this elaborate thing....don't you think something could have or would have stopped this if it wasn't valid ? Do you think the Oracle of Tibet is ignorant ?conebeckham wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:58 pm I find this whole idea of the recognition of Yeye to be contrived--I'll allow that there may be good motivations, perhaps, but in the end so much of this is just speculative and "wrong." I mean, really, "dreams coinciding"---this sort of thing is easily fabricated, and impossible to objectively ascertain. It tests credulity.
Yes...but i can understand why she would react like that....and i can't blame her....she is only human...TharpaChodron wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:16 am What got me in her post which is now taken down was she equivocated any criticism of her recognition as a Buddha as being a result of underlying white supremacy.
I would go to the empowerment. For entertainment value alone it would be unmissable. And after all, there's no possible risk of having samaya with the vajra master...Kaung wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:39 amI’d reconsider if I hear about that from the Nechung Kuten himself.But at this rate,all the learned and accomplished Panditas at DW can claim that they had a vision of the mandala of the black dakini Oshun-Mamaki in union with elephant-headed black ganapati-JesusKunga Lhadzom wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 9:12 pm
Yet.. SHE had the KARMA to meet him, and discuss their dreams ....and HE was convinced enough that SHE IS THE emanation of Mamaki...and took ONE year to prepare for this elaborate thing....don't you think something could have or would have stopped this if it wasn't valid ? Do you think the Oracle of Tibet is ignorant ?Btw,if such a practice existed,I’d pay an arm and a leg to receive the empowerment.
![]()
I'm getting the feeling that there really isn't a way forward in this discussion...Kunga Lhadzom wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:15 amPeterC wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:33 am Honestly, what do you think climate scientists - and not just them, a whole ecosystem of people working on remediation technologies, sustainability, recycling, even geoengineering - spend their time doing? Do you have much knowledge yourself of what they work on? These are in many cases highly specialized careers that require decades of study to make a contribution, and many of the people working in these fields are academic researchers who really don't get paid much and get very little recognition for their work. How do you think they would feel if they read comments like this?
Then what are they waiting for ?
I don't like to beat around the bush....
But of course. How come Medvedev can be White Tara but she cannot be Mamaki?TharpaChodron wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:16 am
What got me in her post which is now taken down was she equivocated any criticism of her recognition as a Buddha as being a result of underlying white supremacy. As if there isn't a plentitude of genuine reasons not remotely related to racism why her claim to being the first female Buddha in modern history might be questionable. She took that post down, so maybe she had a moment of reflection.
And fyi, according to Wikipedia, only white people aka dominant cultures can be guilty of cultural appropriation.![]()
Who is "they" in this sentence? If you mean scientists working on this - I'm guessing you don't know any of them and are not familiar with the enormous amount of work being done.Kunga Lhadzom wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:59 amI don't like to beat around the bush....
The fact of the matter is....the world is falling apart...what are they waiting for ???????????
To get the ok from politicians ?
To get the ok from the Bilderberg's ?
Don't get me wrong. I think white supremacy, racism and white male privelege exist. I just don't believe it relates to everything in the world, namely this.cyril wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:11 amBut of course. How come Medvedev can be White Tara but she cannot be Mamaki?TharpaChodron wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:16 am
What got me in her post which is now taken down was she equivocated any criticism of her recognition as a Buddha as being a result of underlying white supremacy. As if there isn't a plentitude of genuine reasons not remotely related to racism why her claim to being the first female Buddha in modern history might be questionable. She took that post down, so maybe she had a moment of reflection.
And fyi, according to Wikipedia, only white people aka dominant cultures can be guilty of cultural appropriation.![]()
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/60986 ... ddess.html
Medvedev is not even female, goddamit (unless there are details I am not aware of)! That's simply white male privilege!![]()
PeterC wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:31 amWho is "they" in this sentence? If you mean scientists working on this - I'm guessing you don't know any of them and are not familiar with the enormous amount of work being done.Kunga Lhadzom wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:59 amI don't like to beat around the bush....
The fact of the matter is....the world is falling apart...what are they waiting for ???????????
To get the ok from politicians ?
To get the ok from the Bilderberg's ?
You clearly don't mean politicians, because you highlight them as a separate group, but that is the origin of the delay, and it's US politicians more than any other country
It's also not very culturally appropriate: why can't they have Russia-specific yidams? If Horus can be repurposed as an Afro-Tibetan yidam, surely there must be Russian equivalents. Bear-headed dakinis? Chenrezig holding a hammer and a sickle seated on a red star? Guru yoga of Rasputin in union with a bottle of vodka?cyril wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:11 amBut of course. How come Medvedev can be White Tara but she cannot be Mamaki?TharpaChodron wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:16 am
What got me in her post which is now taken down was she equivocated any criticism of her recognition as a Buddha as being a result of underlying white supremacy. As if there isn't a plentitude of genuine reasons not remotely related to racism why her claim to being the first female Buddha in modern history might be questionable. She took that post down, so maybe she had a moment of reflection.
And fyi, according to Wikipedia, only white people aka dominant cultures can be guilty of cultural appropriation.![]()
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/60986 ... ddess.html
Medvedev is not even female, goddamit (unless there are details I am not aware of)! That's simply white male privilege!![]()
I think that would be Heruka Abramovich.PeterC wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:36 am
It's also not very culturally appropriate: why can't they have Russia-specific yidams? If Horus can be repurposed as an Afro-Tibetan yidam, surely there must be Russian equivalents. Bear-headed dakinis? Chenrezig holding a hammer and a sickle seated on a red star? Guru yoga of Rasputin in union with a bottle of vodka?
cyril wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 6:33 amI think that would be Heruka Abramovich.PeterC wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:36 am
It's also not very culturally appropriate: why can't they have Russia-specific yidams? If Horus can be repurposed as an Afro-Tibetan yidam, surely there must be Russian equivalents. Bear-headed dakinis? Chenrezig holding a hammer and a sickle seated on a red star? Guru yoga of Rasputin in union with a bottle of vodka?
"From emptiness, appears the seed-syllable SCAM which transforms into Dorje Abramovich, the master of illusion. He is dressed in the colors of Chelsea Football Club and controls all that appears."
The rest is in the sadhana book...
Dear lord! What's next? The great master Guru Leninche who brought forth the teachings to Russia?PeterC wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:36 amIt's also not very culturally appropriate: why can't they have Russia-specific yidams? If Horus can be repurposed as an Afro-Tibetan yidam, surely there must be Russian equivalents. Bear-headed dakinis? Chenrezig holding a hammer and a sickle seated on a red star? Guru yoga of Rasputin in union with a bottle of vodka?cyril wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:11 amBut of course. How come Medvedev can be White Tara but she cannot be Mamaki?TharpaChodron wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:16 am
What got me in her post which is now taken down was she equivocated any criticism of her recognition as a Buddha as being a result of underlying white supremacy. As if there isn't a plentitude of genuine reasons not remotely related to racism why her claim to being the first female Buddha in modern history might be questionable. She took that post down, so maybe she had a moment of reflection.
And fyi, according to Wikipedia, only white people aka dominant cultures can be guilty of cultural appropriation.![]()
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/60986 ... ddess.html
Medvedev is not even female, goddamit (unless there are details I am not aware of)! That's simply white male privilege!![]()