Self
- LastLegend
- Posts: 5408
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Self
Most people think self is simply an idea...sincerely no please...self is whatever the whole appearance arises as mind phenomena...individualized, distinguished...in the context of us being beaten by karma before truly awakened.
It’s eye blinking.
Re: Self
Some people wouldn’t tell you that you have no self so you wouldn’t be discouraged that who you think you are really isn’t you. But until you become Enlightened, Buddha is saying, kindly “no this really isn’t you.” And when you finally get there, and dwell Thus Gone, you will realize there is no coming and no going, no abiding and no entering extinction.
I like how the Buddha explains it in the Lotus Sutra, the more I read it the happier I become.
I like how the Buddha explains it in the Lotus Sutra, the more I read it the happier I become.
- PadmaVonSamba
- Posts: 9511
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Re: Self
No one can deny that the experience of a self in a dream occurs
Yet no one would say that dream self is real.
Likewise, no one can say that there isn’t an experience of a self when not sleeping
But the Buddha says that this too is not real.
Yet no one would say that dream self is real.
Likewise, no one can say that there isn’t an experience of a self when not sleeping
But the Buddha says that this too is not real.
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
- LastLegend
- Posts: 5408
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Self
Candle has to be blown out.Könchok Chödrak wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 7:35 am Some people wouldn’t tell you that you have no self so you wouldn’t be discouraged that who you think you are really isn’t you. But until you become Enlightened, Buddha is saying, kindly “no this really isn’t you.” And when you finally get there, and dwell Thus Gone, you will realize there is no coming and no going, no abiding and no entering extinction.
I like how the Buddha explains it in the Lotus Sutra, the more I read it the happier I become.
It’s eye blinking.
Re: Self
Self is dualistic vision.PadmaVonSamba wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 1:49 pm No one can deny that the experience of a self in a dream occurs
Yet no one would say that dream self is real.
Likewise, no one can say that there isn’t an experience of a self when not sleeping
But the Buddha says that this too is not real.
Unreal, like a big dream.
Cycles of day and night.
One real the other unreal, both are unreal.
Yet seem real.
Isn’t that wonderful?
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17142
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: Self
Self is the what I believe is perceiving the phenomena, whether it is external phenomena or internal phenomena. In the case of external phenomena it becomes "other", and with internal phenomena it becomes "mine", but the separation is illusory, and impossible to find, I can't find me or mine when I look at the looker.LastLegend wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 6:37 am Most people think self is simply an idea...sincerely no please...self is whatever the whole appearance arises as mind phenomena...individualized, distinguished...in the context of us being beaten by karma before truly awakened.
There is also a kind of "self image" which is more like a kind of frozen image that comes from putting together information from the skandhas and trying to make them into a whole. Meditation wise I don't think this is a very big deal, it's easy to see that it can't be a "self" because it is a little different every time it is noticed. Thinking of "what is looking" as a self is much more pernicious and ingrained.
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
- Supramundane
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:38 am
- Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Re: Self
"A lot of people believe in natthatta until they get punched in the face."
--- Mike Tyson
--- Mike Tyson
- Johnny Dangerous
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17142
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
- Location: Olympia WA
- Contact:
Re: Self
It's punched in the mouth, cite your Tyson correctlySupramundane wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 2:53 am "A lot of people believe in natthatta until they get punched in the face."
--- Mike Tyson
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when afflicted by disease
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when sad
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when suffering occurs
Meditate upon Bodhicitta when you are scared
-Khunu Lama
- Supramundane
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:38 am
- Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Re: Self
I stand corrected.
- FiveSkandhas
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:40 pm
Re: Self
"Self" is an English word. As long as you define this word "self" in a way such that it is not a translation of the Pali term attā, I suppose you can make all sorts of valid arguments using this particular 4-letter word.LastLegend wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 6:37 am Most people think self is simply an idea...sincerely no please...self is whatever the whole appearance arises as mind phenomena...individualized, distinguished...in the context of us being beaten by karma before truly awakened.
But the majority translation consensus is sort of hardening these days, and most Buddhists are tending to use "self" to mean something in the neighborhood of attā or 我.
But hey, fight the power. If Herbert Guenther can get away with using the English language the way he does in Matrix of Mystery, I'm willing to cut you a lot of slack on how you choose to define and use the term "self."
"One should cultivate contemplation in one’s foibles. The foibles are like fish, and contemplation is like fishing hooks. If there are no fish, then the fishing hooks have no use. The bigger the fish is, the better the result we will get. As long as the fishing hooks keep at it, all foibles will eventually be contained and controlled at will." -Zhiyi
"Just be kind." -Atisha
"Just be kind." -Atisha
- LastLegend
- Posts: 5408
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Self
You have to use English to communicate right...I understand there are some words are difficult to translate...Self is “Ngã” in Vietnamese literally means “I.” In Chan, how we understand ‘I’ is rejected. That’s why there is a koan ‘Who am I?”
It’s eye blinking.
- FiveSkandhas
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:40 pm
Re: Self
Chan seems to differentiate between 我 and 性.LastLegend wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 2:48 pm In Chan, how we understand ‘I’ is rejected. That’s why there is a koan ‘Who am I?”
我 is the common Chinese translation for the Pali attā and is usually translated into English as "self". Thus the Chan expression 無我 ("no self")
性 is the common Chinese translation for the Sanskrit svabhāva (स्वभाव) and is often translated in English as "true nature" or "essential nature." Thus the Chan expression 見性 for dṛṣṭi-svabhāva or "view one's essential nature"...Kensho in Japanese Rinzai Zen.
So we've got "no self" but "essential nature"...any thoughts on how they fit together? I agree with those who point to a strong Yogacara influence on Chan.
"One should cultivate contemplation in one’s foibles. The foibles are like fish, and contemplation is like fishing hooks. If there are no fish, then the fishing hooks have no use. The bigger the fish is, the better the result we will get. As long as the fishing hooks keep at it, all foibles will eventually be contained and controlled at will." -Zhiyi
"Just be kind." -Atisha
"Just be kind." -Atisha
- LastLegend
- Posts: 5408
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:46 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Self
Essential nature has no self...because essential nature just is...there is nothing in there to know “this is essential nature.” We still know that means there is something that is automatically separate (and thus self ‘I versus it, them, etc’) whether we know it explicitly or implicitly...but it’s not understood to merge it or anything that would be constructing and grasping...it has to be truly cessated to truly be clear of nature.FiveSkandhas wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 3:19 pmChan seems to differentiate between 我 and 性.LastLegend wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 2:48 pm In Chan, how we understand ‘I’ is rejected. That’s why there is a koan ‘Who am I?”
我 is the common Chinese translation for the Pali attā and is usually translated into English as "self". Thus the Chan expression 無我 ("no self")
性 is the common Chinese translation for the Sanskrit svabhāva (स्वभाव) and is often translated in English as "true nature" or "essential nature." Thus the Chan expression 見性 for dṛṣṭi-svabhāva or "view one's essential nature"...Kensho in Japanese Rinzai Zen.
So we've got "no self" but "essential nature"...any thoughts on how they fit together? I agree with those who point to a strong Yogacara influence on Chan.
It’s eye blinking.
- FiveSkandhas
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:40 pm
Re: Self
Interesting, thank you.LastLegend wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 3:45 pm
Essential nature has no self...because essential nature just is...there is nothing in there to know “this is essential nature.” We still know that means there is something that is automatically separate (and thus self ‘I versus it, them, etc’) whether we know it explicitly or implicitly...but it’s not understood to merge it or anything that would be constructing and grasping...it has to be truly cessated to truly be clear of nature.
"One should cultivate contemplation in one’s foibles. The foibles are like fish, and contemplation is like fishing hooks. If there are no fish, then the fishing hooks have no use. The bigger the fish is, the better the result we will get. As long as the fishing hooks keep at it, all foibles will eventually be contained and controlled at will." -Zhiyi
"Just be kind." -Atisha
"Just be kind." -Atisha
-
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2020 9:52 pm
Re: Self
Try not to take things personally. It's usually not about you.
from twitter
from twitter
- PadmaVonSamba
- Posts: 9511
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Re: Self
Conventionally, we can say yourself or myself and refer to specific streams of consciousness, specific karma, which differentiates you from me. You and I do not share the same existence. In that sense, self becomes a workable concept even if no actual self or atma can be located.
You can use the analogy of two different rivers.
Yes, on the one hand you can distinguish the Amazon from the Nile. Each one is, itself, a different river than the other.
But if you examine either one or the other, neither one is constantly the same for even a second. Neither has that kind of “self”.
Likewise with people. I am a me and you are you, comparatively. But if I look at me, there is no “me” and if you look at you, there is no “you”.
Even that awareness which is looking is not a self.
(Advaita Vedanta argues that awareness is the self, but Buddhism disputes that assertion.)
We impose the experience of “self” onto that awareness. First, there is awareness, and only then, because there are objects of awareness, we impute “me” onto that awareness. “Me, I myself am having that awareness” ...but that is really the source of samsara, of the whole problem to begin with.
...
You can use the analogy of two different rivers.
Yes, on the one hand you can distinguish the Amazon from the Nile. Each one is, itself, a different river than the other.
But if you examine either one or the other, neither one is constantly the same for even a second. Neither has that kind of “self”.
Likewise with people. I am a me and you are you, comparatively. But if I look at me, there is no “me” and if you look at you, there is no “you”.
Even that awareness which is looking is not a self.
(Advaita Vedanta argues that awareness is the self, but Buddhism disputes that assertion.)
We impose the experience of “self” onto that awareness. First, there is awareness, and only then, because there are objects of awareness, we impute “me” onto that awareness. “Me, I myself am having that awareness” ...but that is really the source of samsara, of the whole problem to begin with.
...
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
-
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2020 9:52 pm
Re: Self
First look, is the best look.