Is samsara meant literal or not

If you're new to the forum or new to Buddhism, this is the best place for your questions. Responses require moderator approval before they are visible.
User avatar
Kova
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2021 3:54 am

Re: Is samsara meant literal or not

Post by Kova »

yinyangkoi wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:54 am
Kova wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 2:10 am In my humble opinion I find no contradiction in thinking that they are both states of mind and real kingdoms at the same time. If i die in angry state of mind i rebirth in hell. And if i die happy i rebirth in kingdom of devas. They are at the same time states of mind and real kingdoms
But there is no way to know for sure these kingdoms are real... We can only speculate and believe on blind faith. Of course it's possible, but there is no way to know
If we can. In meditation. Everybody. Many meditators saw the heavens. In fact, it is said that Buddha "ascended" to heaven to teach the devas (in meditation) And the ideal would be to die in those states to be reborn there
User avatar
PadmaVonSamba
Posts: 9439
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am

Re: Is samsara meant literal or not

Post by PadmaVonSamba »

What matters isn’t whether you or I think god realms are real, or hell realms, or hungry ghost realms.
What matters is that those beings think they are real. It is actually their experience, as projections of their own minds, exactly in the same way that our experience is a projection of our own minds
If this is understood, then there is no difference between “are they real places” and “are they metaphors for human psychology”.

You have to examine your own criteria for what determines that something is a realm, or a place of some kind. What constitutes “place”? You need to figure that out first, before you can decide whether a realm is a place that is “real”.

You have to establish, when discussing samsaric realms, what is the difference between literal and metaphorical.

So, do that first.
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
User avatar
Queen Elizabeth II
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:35 pm

Re: Is samsara meant literal or not

Post by Queen Elizabeth II »

Supramundane wrote: Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:00 am Are you familiar with the Ship of Theseus riddle? Does it apply to the human body?
Not yet afaik, but I suppose it will if medical science ever advances to the point where every single part of your body can be replaced with a transplant.
User avatar
Queen Elizabeth II
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:35 pm

Re: Is samsara meant literal or not

Post by Queen Elizabeth II »

Johnny Dangerous wrote: Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:31 am No, they aren't "the same", any more than an orange is "the same" orange three days later.
The meanings of "same" and "different" will vary according to the conventions operating in different fields. If an ābhidharmika, for example, wants to claim that the rūpa dharmas that make up one's body exist only for a moment, then I'll happily concede that if that's true then we now have an entirely different body from the one we had a second ago.

However, the statement to which I was replying was clearly made with biological conventions in mind, not the conventions of Abhidharma or chemistry or physics. And so I adhered to the same conventions in my reply. For a biologist the statement, "The lens in Fred's left eye is different from the one he had seven years ago" would only be true if Fred has had a lens transplant. If Fred hasn't had a lens transplant then from a biologist's point of view the lens will be the same lens, notwithstanding the fact that some of the matter that constituted it has been lost in that interval.
User avatar
Supramundane
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:38 am
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia

Re: Is samsara meant literal or not

Post by Supramundane »

Queen Elizabeth II wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 4:26 am
Supramundane wrote: Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:00 am Are you familiar with the Ship of Theseus riddle? Does it apply to the human body?
Not yet afaik, but I suppose it will if medical science ever advances to the point where every single part of your body can be replaced with a transplant.
No need for transplants or transhumanism if, as some here claim, our cells replace each other constantly.
yinyangkoi
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:41 pm

Re: Is samsara meant literal or not

Post by yinyangkoi »

Supramundane wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:41 am
Queen Elizabeth II wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 4:26 am
Supramundane wrote: Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:00 am Are you familiar with the Ship of Theseus riddle? Does it apply to the human body?
Not yet afaik, but I suppose it will if medical science ever advances to the point where every single part of your body can be replaced with a transplant.
No need for transplants or transhumanism if, as some here claim, our cells replace each other constantly.
when the cell replicates there is a chance errors will happen, for example radiation from sun mutates the skins cell DNA and it replicates faulty. It's a complex topic
User avatar
PadmaVonSamba
Posts: 9439
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am

Re: Is samsara meant literal or not

Post by PadmaVonSamba »

yinyangkoi wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 12:43 pm
Supramundane wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:41 am
Queen Elizabeth II wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 4:26 am

Not yet afaik, but I suppose it will if medical science ever advances to the point where every single part of your body can be replaced with a transplant.
No need for transplants or transhumanism if, as some here claim, our cells replace each other constantly.
when the cell replicates there is a chance errors will happen, for example radiation from sun mutates the skins cell DNA and it replicates faulty. It's a complex topic
That’s true. Just because one cell is replaced by another doesn’t mean it’s the right type of cell. My lungs decided a couple of years ago to start replacing regular cells with scar tissue. Now I am waiting for a lung transplant.

Or rather, my body is waiting for a lung transplant.
“I” am exactly the same (constantly changing 😄) person I was.
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
yinyangkoi
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 1:41 pm

Re: Is samsara meant literal or not

Post by yinyangkoi »

I have found a zen center where I got a teacher who is now training me. She said samsara is something that depends on ones own karma, and it is completely different for everyone, she said one must experience it oneself to see what samsara is and how it works.
Post Reply

Return to “Discovering Mahayana Buddhism”