TYVM Mark. Hope all is well.
The Great Abortion Debate
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
I have listened to this sutra and dharani as an mp3 file several times, I think it is this very translation.tkp67 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 2:16 pmAemilius wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 9:04 am Do you mean this sutra:
The Dharani Sutra of the Buddha on Longevity
The Extinction of Offences
And the Protection of Young Children
"My circumstance is such that my family's condition does not allow me to bear any children. That is why I used medicine to murder the foetus, which was fully eight months old. The foetus that I aborted was fully grown with four healthy limbs and was complete with a human form."
"Later I met with a wise man who told me, 'People who have purposely aborted the foetus will be infected with serious illnesses in the present lifespan and receive the retribution of a short lifespan with very little blessing. After they have passed away, they will fall into the Avici Hell to experience terribly acute sufferings'."
"After listen to that, I was very frightened and I deeply regret what I have done. I only hope that the World Honoured One, with your strength of great kindness and compassion, will save me from falling into the deep pit. Please tell me the ways of liberation. Do allow me to leave the home life, so as to not undergo such acute sufferings."
etc...
http://buddhasutra.com/files/dharani_su ... ddha_1.htm
I read this some time ago and questioned authenticity and was unsure how to reconcile this.
The title and body has added verbiage that does not exist in other translations.
svaha
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
- PadmaVonSamba
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
Oh well, those things happen.
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
I had read the translation on buddha.net IIRC. The I searched for variants and found the Tibetan version which was much shorter. I believe the same meaning can be taken from it and am not making a judgement against it. I just don't know if it can be considered conclusive.Aemilius wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:54 amI have listened to this sutra and dharani as an mp3 file several times, I think it is this very translation.tkp67 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 2:16 pmAemilius wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 9:04 am Do you mean this sutra:
The Dharani Sutra of the Buddha on Longevity
The Extinction of Offences
And the Protection of Young Children
"My circumstance is such that my family's condition does not allow me to bear any children. That is why I used medicine to murder the foetus, which was fully eight months old. The foetus that I aborted was fully grown with four healthy limbs and was complete with a human form."
"Later I met with a wise man who told me, 'People who have purposely aborted the foetus will be infected with serious illnesses in the present lifespan and receive the retribution of a short lifespan with very little blessing. After they have passed away, they will fall into the Avici Hell to experience terribly acute sufferings'."
"After listen to that, I was very frightened and I deeply regret what I have done. I only hope that the World Honoured One, with your strength of great kindness and compassion, will save me from falling into the deep pit. Please tell me the ways of liberation. Do allow me to leave the home life, so as to not undergo such acute sufferings."
etc...
http://buddhasutra.com/files/dharani_su ... ddha_1.htm
I read this some time ago and questioned authenticity and was unsure how to reconcile this.
The title and body has added verbiage that does not exist in other translations.
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
Could you send over this Tibetan version? Thanks!tkp67 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:48 pmI had read the translation on buddha.net IIRC. The I searched for variants and found the Tibetan version which was much shorter. I believe the same meaning can be taken from it and am not making a judgement against it. I just don't know if it can be considered conclusive.
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔
-
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 11:39 am
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
https://read.84000.co/translation/UT22084-051-001.htmlTenma wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 4:57 amCould you send over this Tibetan version? Thanks!tkp67 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:48 pmI had read the translation on buddha.net IIRC. The I searched for variants and found the Tibetan version which was much shorter. I believe the same meaning can be taken from it and am not making a judgement against it. I just don't know if it can be considered conclusive.
The antidote—to be free from the suffering of samsara—you need to be free from delusion and karma; you need to be free from ignorance, the root of samsara. So you need to meditate on emptiness. That is what you need. Lama Zopa Rinpoche
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
I confess. I have lost my way a little on this thread. Could anyone summarise where the debate has reached? I would be grateful.
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
I believe this is the Tibetan equivalent. Perhaps a practitioner from one of the Tibetan traditions can validate as much.Tenma wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 4:57 amCould you send over this Tibetan version? Thanks!tkp67 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:48 pmI had read the translation on buddha.net IIRC. The I searched for variants and found the Tibetan version which was much shorter. I believe the same meaning can be taken from it and am not making a judgement against it. I just don't know if it can be considered conclusive.
---> https://84000.co/new-publication-the-dh ... nd-wisdom/
The Dhāraṇī “Essence of Immeasurable Longevity and Wisdom”
-
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:54 am
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
I was just reading in "Perfect Conduct" about the root downfall of killing. Dudjom Rinpoche says killing involves killing a human being, which includes an unborn fetus.
I was a bit surprised when I read this, having come from a modern education. I understand the in depth arguments made earlier in this thread, but I thought it was interesting that such a being as Dudjom Rinpoche said this.
I was a bit surprised when I read this, having come from a modern education. I understand the in depth arguments made earlier in this thread, but I thought it was interesting that such a being as Dudjom Rinpoche said this.
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
An unborn foetus before the end of the first trimester has no nervous system or independent biology, so how can it be a human being? It is a human being in potential. But not yet.
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
Perhaps the latent potential of human life is greater than any delusion manifested by it.
-
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:54 am
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
Perhaps the consciousness had already entered the fetus and is just waiting to develop. Of course it wouldn't feel pain and it's not a fully developed person.
And perhaps having an abortion even before the first trimester would shut the door to its experience in the human world. If it were to follow Dharma, that would have made it a precious human birth. So maybe it's better for buddhists to not have abortions.
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
A precious human birth is unlikely to come from an unwanted pregnancy. More likely is a miserable life that accumulates bad karma.
"We estimate that crime fell roughly 20% between 1997 and 2014 due to legalized abortion. The cumulative impact of legalized abortion on crime is roughly 45%, accounting for a very substantial portion of the roughly 50-55% overall decline from the peak of crime in the early 1990s."
https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/upl ... 201975.pdf
"We estimate that crime fell roughly 20% between 1997 and 2014 due to legalized abortion. The cumulative impact of legalized abortion on crime is roughly 45%, accounting for a very substantial portion of the roughly 50-55% overall decline from the peak of crime in the early 1990s."
https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/upl ... 201975.pdf
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
The value of precious human birth exists within the teachings of many traditions. I have yet to find any precious birth as a hungry seagull following a trawler teachings.
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
Consciousness does not “enter” a foetus. The rupa/form of a foetus arises together with the other skandhas. Rupa is not a container for the other skandhas. They arise together, and as a pre trimester foetus has no functioning nervous system the arising of the skandhas happen in a staged way. And nothing happens without karma vipaka.SilenceMonkey wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 5:44 pmPerhaps the consciousness had already entered the fetus and is just waiting to develop. Of course it wouldn't feel pain and it's not a fully developed person.
And perhaps having an abortion even before the first trimester would shut the door to its experience in the human world. If it were to follow Dharma, that would have made it a precious human birth. So maybe it's better for buddhists to not have abortions.
-
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:54 am
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
Our consciousness enters the egg in the moment sperm and egg meet (after mom and dad have intercourse). Then the rest of the aggregates develop into a fetus and eventually a fully formed baby.Giovanni wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 7:04 pmConsciousness does not “enter” a foetus. The rupa/form of a foetus arises together with the other skandhas. Rupa is not a container for the other skandhas. They arise together, and as a pre trimester foetus has no functioning nervous system the arising of the skandhas happen in a staged way. And nothing happens without karma vipaka.SilenceMonkey wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 5:44 pmPerhaps the consciousness had already entered the fetus and is just waiting to develop. Of course it wouldn't feel pain and it's not a fully developed person.
And perhaps having an abortion even before the first trimester would shut the door to its experience in the human world. If it were to follow Dharma, that would have made it a precious human birth. So maybe it's better for buddhists to not have abortions.
This is usually taught in teachings on the 12 links. It’s how we are reborn as human beings.
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
Perhaps semantics, but nothing “enters” anything. Consciousness arises. It is a function not a “thing”. And it arises to the degree that conditions exist. In the absence of a CNS then consciousness, sparsa, etc can only arise to the degree that conditions for its arising exist. Consciousness is not an atta entering a body. It has causes and conditions. Largely these are karma driven.
- PadmaVonSamba
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
If consciousness enters the fertilized egg cell, then where does it go when that egg cell naturally dies? Every cell in your body has been replaced every 7 years or so.SilenceMonkey wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 7:23 pmOur consciousness enters the egg in the moment sperm and egg meet (after mom and dad have intercourse). Then the rest of the aggregates develop into a fetus and eventually a fully formed baby.Giovanni wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 7:04 pmConsciousness does not “enter” a foetus. The rupa/form of a foetus arises together with the other skandhas. Rupa is not a container for the other skandhas. They arise together, and as a pre trimester foetus has no functioning nervous system the arising of the skandhas happen in a staged way. And nothing happens without karma vipaka.SilenceMonkey wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 5:44 pm
Perhaps the consciousness had already entered the fetus and is just waiting to develop. Of course it wouldn't feel pain and it's not a fully developed person.
And perhaps having an abortion even before the first trimester would shut the door to its experience in the human world. If it were to follow Dharma, that would have made it a precious human birth. So maybe it's better for buddhists to not have abortions.
This is usually taught in teachings on the 12 links. It’s how we are reborn as human beings.
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
- PadmaVonSamba
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Re: The Great Abortion Debate
Yes. Very often fertilized eggs don’t survive.Giovanni wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 7:32 pm Perhaps semantics, but nothing “enters” anything. Consciousness arises. It is a function not a “thing”. And it arises to the degree that conditions exist. In the absence of a CNS then consciousness, sparsa, etc can only arise to the degree that conditions for its arising exist. Consciousness is not an atta entering a body. It has causes and conditions. Largely these are karma driven.
EMPTIFUL.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.
An inward outlook produces outward insight.