Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:52 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2049 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
Wesley1982 wrote:
It is widely held as Christian dogma that Jesus son of Mary was conceived/born without a human father. :shrug:

In my opinion this was added later when the mythology was compiled and written down, just like with the Buddha birth story.
Institutional religions are notorious for having celibate men compose their histories and rules. That is why we have so much sexual repression and misogyny in our religious texts.

The great man Jesus had a dad and his dad had a penis. His penis was at least once inside his mom.
That is how babies are made.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
justsit wrote:
Whom are you trying to convince, Mint?

Anyone he can.
our friend mint is on a mission of personal frustration.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:23 pm
Posts: 1967
Nangwa wrote:
Wesley1982 wrote:

The great man Jesus had a dad and his dad had a penis. His penis was at least once inside his mom.
That is how babies are made.



It just popped into my mind that maybe what was meant was that a Bodhisattva chose to be reborn in the human realm.

_________________
Left


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:24 pm
Posts: 641
Location: Delaware
Nangwa wrote:
justsit wrote:
Whom are you trying to convince, Mint?

Anyone he can.


Himself, primarily, I think.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:30 pm
Posts: 1444
The fundamental underlying assumption is that this story of jesus has authority in and of itself. The bible is merely a book with stories in it, it has no power or authority by itself. Any legitimacy or power it has is solely what is imputed upon it. One has to believe it, and belief is no different than opinion. Just as I am stating my belief/opinion at this moment. Things are what we make them, we like to believe it is the other way around. Just because there is a collective movement behind a certain belief or opinion doesn't make it legitimate, however in most cases it ends up becoming a paradigm which delegates a pseudo-standard of legitimacy via default.

A belief stands alone, and then one either forms attachment or aversion to it. If attachment occurs the belief has to be defended because it doesn't have any power by itself. One has to fight to uphold it's legitimacy and will seek others who mirror their own beliefs so they can feel comfortable and reinforced. The same goes for one who forms aversion to a belief, they fall victim to the same factors. Disbelief is still belief, one only believes the opposite extreme. Due to these attachments or aversions suffering arises, conflict, war (within and without).

It can be seen unraveling in this very thread, where we are attached, where we avert. The finding of sources to back up claims which reinforce points of view regarding ones respective position on a belief or opinion. These are the seeds of separation. Myself, I see the game and I bow out.

That being said, I enjoy Buddhism because the belief aspect of it is irrelevant. It is an empirical investigation and an experiential endeavor. Belief eventually becomes a binding factor in Buddhism (and can hold one back). Though I am happy for those who benefit from believing whatever it is they choose to believe (and if benefit is derived from it that is a good thing), my not so humble opinion is that belief is slavery.

And I don't fall victim to that opinion because it's seen for what it is, it is consciously employed, and holds no power other than that which I give it (unless of course I share it publicly like I just did :tongue: then it is also endowed with the power others give it, and thus the seeds of karma are sewn).


Last edited by asunthatneversets on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:45 pm
Posts: 739
Location: Magga ~ Path to Liberation.
Jikan wrote:
Yes, but knowledge of what, specifically?


The knowledge gained from reading the opinions of a diverse group of people.


Last edited by Wesley1982 on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:45 pm
Posts: 436
Nangwa wrote:
our friend mint is on a mission of personal frustration.


I think if you read mindyourmind's last post, you'll take notice of the real frustration.

It's easier to dismiss me, though, when you can't counter with an intelligent argument in defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm
Posts: 5771
Wesley1982 wrote:
Jikan wrote:
mint wrote:

Does Buddhism not state that ignorance is due to lack of knowledge?

I concur.


Yes, but knowledge of what, specifically?


I would say the knowledge gained from reading the opinions of a diverse group of people.


It's more immediate and, shall we say, personal than that.

_________________
Need help getting on retreat? Want to support others in practice? Pay the Dana for Dharma forum a visit...

viewtopic.php?f=114&t=13727


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
mint wrote:
Nangwa wrote:
our friend mint is on a mission of personal frustration.




It's easier to dismiss me, though, when you can't counter with an intelligent argument in defense.


There is nothing to defend.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
Blue Garuda wrote:
Nangwa wrote:
Wesley1982 wrote:

The great man Jesus had a dad and his dad had a penis. His penis was at least once inside his mom.
That is how babies are made.



It just popped into my mind that maybe what was meant was that a Bodhisattva chose to be reborn in the human realm.

Thats a possibility I suppose but even bodhisattvas in the human realm need penises and vaginas in order to take birth.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 4:23 pm
Posts: 2107
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Wesley1982 wrote:
It is widely held as Christian dogma that Jesus son of Mary was conceived/born without a human father. :shrug:


Virgin births stories were around long before Jesus. Osiris and other virgin birth mythologies existed hundreds of years before the Christian birth story was created. Greek mythology (which dates to well before the time of Jesus) is full of stories of gods impregnating mortal women. The influence of Greek culture on the early Christians no doubt led to the creation of that story. The New Testament records Jesus saying, "I am the alpha and the omega" yet Jesus spoke Aramaic-Hebrew. Such a statement is not Hebrew and would actually not make any sense to even attempt to say such a thing in Hebrew.

_________________
Image
www.TheDhamma.com/
Dhamma Wiki encyclopedia
Dhamma Wheel forum


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:30 pm
Posts: 1444
David N. Snyder wrote:
Wesley1982 wrote:
It is widely held as Christian dogma that Jesus son of Mary was conceived/born without a human father. :shrug:


Virgin births stories were around long before Jesus. Osiris and other virgin birth mythologies existed hundreds of years before the Christian birth story was created. Greek mythology (which dates to well before the time of Jesus) is full of stories of gods impregnating mortal women. The influence of Greek culture on the early Christians no doubt led to the creation of that story....


Though it's met fierce resistance from Christians who have attempted to debunk this info, this first section of the 2007 documentary Zeitgeist covers the long list of virgin births which predated jesus. I believe there are rebuttal videos (assembled by christians) which attempt to smear Zeitgeist, and then further subsequent debunking (of the christian debunking) done by Zeitgeist proponents. It's definitely an ongoing back and forth controversy (as any good religious debate should be), but here's the original video:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZgT1SRcrKE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 12:20 am
Posts: 66
Nangwa wrote:
Wesley1982 wrote:
It is widely held as Christian dogma that Jesus son of Mary was conceived/born without a human father. :shrug:

In my opinion this was added later when the mythology was compiled and written down, just like with the Buddha birth story.
Institutional religions are notorious for having celibate men compose their histories and rules. That is why we have so much sexual repression and misogyny in our religious texts.

The great man Jesus had a dad and his dad had a penis. His penis was at least once inside his mom.
That is how babies are made.

Pretty much there is little reference to any divinity in the Gospels but it is hinted at. The reality is Christianity needed to have Jesus be Divine in order to break from the hierarchy of Judaism as it was little different than various Judaic Sects at the time. Therefore I feel that the break was largely politically motivated in order to have separate hierarchies. If Christianity had remained on its path it would be nothing more than a following of Jews who adhere to an obscure Rabbi but with the myth of Divinity it creates a whole new religion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 47
Nangwa wrote:

Thats a possibility I suppose but even bodhisattvas in the human realm need penises and vaginas in order to take birth.
'

Than what's your take on Guru Rinpoche?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
Sonam Wangchug wrote:
Nangwa wrote:

Thats a possibility I suppose but even bodhisattvas in the human realm need penises and vaginas in order to take birth.
'

Than what's your take on Guru Rinpoche?

Guru Rinpoche was a man born to parents who had penises and vaginas.
Thats my take. I dont buy the floral-birth legend at all and actually think it is completely unnecessary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:30 pm
Posts: 1444
Sonam Wangchug wrote:
Nangwa wrote:

Thats a possibility I suppose but even bodhisattvas in the human realm need penises and vaginas in order to take birth.
'

Than what's your take on Guru Rinpoche?


Some say Guru Rinpoche's father was Drenpa Namkha.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Buddhism on God
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche was meeting a traveller along the way in India. The traveller had no idea Rinpoche is buddhist but saw some kind of religious person.
The traveller said: my God came from Jerusalem.
Rinpoche said: my God actually come from where you come from.

The traveller was bit annoyed, thought Rinpoche was joking.

sound is unclear. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT7RueeUHVg

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:03 am 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Let us not confuse virgin birth with immaculate conception.

This account: "Queen Māyā and King Suddhodhana did not have children for twenty years into their marriage. According to legend, One full moon night, sleeping in the palace, the queen had a vivid dream. She felt herself being carried away by four devas (spirits) to Lake Anotatta in the Himalayas. After bathing her in the lake, the devas clothed her in heavenly cloths, anointed her with perfumes, and bedecked her with divine flowers. Soon after a white elephant, holding a white lotus flower in its trunk, appeared and went round her three times, entering her womb through her right side. Finally the elephant disappeared and the queen awoke, knowing she had been delivered an important message, as the elephant is a symbol of greatness in Nepal..." does not exclude the act of fornication BEFORE (either immediately so or days before) going to sleep and having the dream.

The account of Queen Maya giving birth "through her side" may be a metaphorical description of birth via caesarian section. The practice of caesarian section is recorded in accounts dating back to 300BC, so there is no reason to believe that it was not in effect earlier. The fact that Queen Maya died soon after (from three to seven days later) could thus be easily justified. Truth is though that death after vaginal birth was not (and in some parts of the world, is still not) an uncommon phenomenon.

So before we start getting all metaphysical we can examine all the boring old human options.
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:45 pm
Posts: 436
Infinite wrote:
The reality is Christianity needed to have Jesus be Divine in order to break from the hierarchy of Judaism as it was little different than various Judaic Sects at the time. Therefore I feel that the break was largely politically motivated in order to have separate hierarchies. If Christianity had remained on its path it would be nothing more than a following of Jews who adhere to an obscure Rabbi but with the myth of Divinity it creates a whole new religion.


Again, you're wrong.

Jesus didn't need to be divine for Christianity to do anything. Some of the greatest, most influential "heresies" in the years following the death of Jesus posited that he was a man, not divine. Furthermore, you need to re-read every single one of Paul's letters, who believed in the divinity of Jesus, who was a faithful Jew, who advocated inclusion for both the Jews and the Greeks, and foresaw the day when all Jews and Greeks worshipped together.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:45 pm
Posts: 436
asunthatneversets wrote:
my not so humble opinion is that belief is slavery.


It's true. There is a lot riding on the belief that a select few of best-selling authors represent the majority opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2049 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group