Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:37 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Qualified masters are extremely rare and hard to discern. They are like mangoes.

There are some teachers who look ripe and are ripe; some teachers who look ripe but are not ripe; some teachers who look unripe but are ripe; and some teachers who look unripe and are unripe.

If you find the first type of teacher or the third, fantastic. If you wind up with two or four, good luck.

Make sure your master has a real lineage.

There are many people out there these days who promote themselves as "Dzogchen masters", "tertons", "tulkus" and so on. There are many gullible people in America, etc., and many unethical people who don't mind taking advantage of them.

So be careful.

N

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 600
Location: kent
While checking a master's qualifications there is the risk of wasting precious time because only spending enough time with a teacher or attending his teaching will put you in a position to make an informed decision.

_________________
AOM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
Namdrol wrote:
Qualified masters are extremely rare and hard to discern. They are like mangoes.

There are some teachers who look ripe and are ripe; some teachers who look ripe but are not ripe; some teachers who look unripe but are ripe; and some teachers who look unripe and are unripe.

If you find the first type of teacher or the third, fantastic. If you wind up with two or four, good luck.

Make sure your master has a real lineage.

There are many people out there these days who promote themselves as "Dzogchen masters", "tertons", "tulkus" and so on. There are many gullible people in America, etc., and many unethical people who don't mind taking advantage of them.

So be careful.

N


Excellent advice.
In a perfect world this wouldnt be a concern, but then again, a perfect world probably wouldnt be samsara.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Athens - GR
alpha wrote:
While checking a master's qualifications there is the risk of wasting precious time because only spending enough time with a teacher or attending his teaching will put you in a position to make an informed decision.


I prefer to waste a little of my precious time for checking the teacher before I trust him/her, than wasting my whole precious life by following fake gurus with wrong views! ;)
Thank you, Namdrol. This is an important warning for everybody! :twothumbsup:

_________________
"My view is as vast as the sky, but my actions are finer than flour"
~ Padmasambhava ~


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:12 pm
Posts: 1061
Could you please name those you consider ripe (or indeed unripe)?

_________________
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Paul wrote:
Could you please name those you consider ripe (or indeed unripe)?


Oh, that is easy -- Chogyal Namkhai Norbu and Taklung Tsetrul Rinpoche.

As for the rest, people will have to go and check them out on the fruit stand personally.

N

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 4612
Location: Baltimore, MD
Namdrol wrote:
Paul wrote:
Could you please name those you consider ripe (or indeed unripe)?


Oh, that is easy -- Chogyal Namkhai Norbu and Taklung Tsetrul Rinpoche.

As for the rest, people will have to go and check them out on the fruit stand personally.


The whole of the Tibetan Buddhist world cannot learn just from two, three, four, five teachers even if we only go on a kind of retreat with them once a year. It might be better in a way just to go with semi-ripe teachers who themselves might have no or low realization but are ethical and non-harming and do teach Buddhadharma to the best of their ability. Times are tough in a way. In another way we are already inundated with a massive banquet of Dharma.

Lineage holders have to do their best to pass on the lineage for the next several generations (not just the next one) so their main focus has to be this activity.

Kirt

_________________
Kirt's Tibetan Translation Notes

"Only you can make your mind beautiful."
HH Chetsang Rinpoche


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How to choose a guru
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Posts: 1952
Here is a traditional way to appraise gurus; even if all 10 are not there, yet if 3 or 4 are, that may be the best you will find these days:

Quote:
Maitreya says in his Ornament for the Mahayana Sutras (Mahayana-sutralamkara):

Rely on a Mahayana teacher who is disciplined, serene, thoroughly pacified;
Has good qualities surpassing those of the students; is energetic; has a wealth of scriptural knowledge;
Possesses loving concern; has thorough knowledge of reality and skill in instructing disciples;
And has abandoned dispiritedness.


Or as Thurman's version puts it:

Quote:
17:10. One should serve a (spiritual) friend who is disciplined, tranquil, serene, outstanding in good qualities, energetic, rich in (knowledge of) scripture, awakened to reality, skilled in speech, compassionate, and indefatigable.

A friend with these qualities is the ground of service. "Disciplined" means that the senses are restrained due to moral discipline. "Tranquil" means that the mind is internally quieted by discipline in meditative concentration. "Serene" means the instinctual addictions are eradicated by the discipline of wisdom. "Outstanding in good qualities" means that he is unequalled and non-deficient. "Energetic" means that he is not indifferent to the welfare of others. "Rich in scripture" means that his learning is not inferior. "Awakened to reality" means that he understands reality. "Skilled in speech" means that he is skilled in the techniques of speaking. "Compassionate" means that his mind is free from the desire for material possessions. "Indefatigable" means that he teaches the Dharma continuously and reverently.

_________________
Only consider helping others and forget yourself. Master Hsuan Hua


Last edited by Will on Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
kirtu wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
Paul wrote:
Could you please name those you consider ripe (or indeed unripe)?


Oh, that is easy -- Chogyal Namkhai Norbu and Taklung Tsetrul Rinpoche.

As for the rest, people will have to go and check them out on the fruit stand personally.


The whole of the Tibetan Buddhist world cannot learn just from two, three, four, five teachers even if we only go on a kind of retreat with them once a year.


I was not making a global statement. Paul asked me who I thought was "ripe", and the context here is Dzogchen masters. I do not know other Dzogchen masters, apart from ones who have passed away. This is not a dis against other teachers.

Dzogchen should be learned from a ripe master. There are very few of those -- meet them while you still have a chance. I just mentioned two.

N

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:30 pm
Posts: 1444
They certainly are few and far between, Lopon Tenzin Namdak and Chatral Rinpoche also come to mind(though I don't know them personally). I'm sure there's some dark horses out there who have yet to (or may never) publicly grace us as well. The true heavy hitters (who are still living) could very well be in the single digits though, would not surprise me in the least.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:58 pm
Posts: 630
Well that's an interesting point of view.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
ngodrup wrote:
Well that's an interesting point of view.

What?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:45 am 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:12 pm
Posts: 1061
Namdrol wrote:
Dzogchen should be learned from a ripe master. There are very few of those -- meet them while you still have a chance. I just mentioned two.

N


What exactly is "ripe", anyway?

_________________
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 592
Never mind.


Last edited by Clarence on Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 592
Paul wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
Dzogchen should be learned from a ripe master. There are very few of those -- meet them while you still have a chance. I just mentioned two.

N


What exactly is "ripe", anyway?


Ripe would be at least 3rd vision. So few are at that level.

I think it was Namdrol who said it took Kunzang Dechen Lingpa 7 years in strict Thogal retreat to reach 3rd vision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 11:13 pm
Posts: 124
Kunzang Dechen Lingpa:
Image
From http://tibetanaltar.blogspot.co.uk/2009 ... haras.html

_________________
“If you propose to speak always ask yourself, is it true, is it necessary, is it kind?”
― Siddhārtha Gautama

taichihastings.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:11 pm
Posts: 1999
Location: France
I like the term Ripe ... because after a while it becomes Rotten

Sönam

_________________
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
Sönam wrote:
I like the term Ripe ... because after a while it becomes Rotten

Sönam


That might be true for mango's, not Guru's though. The 4th vision is even better. :smile:

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 600
Location: kent
Did CNNR reach the 3d vision?
Just curious. Not that it matters.
He is a great teacher anyway. :smile:

_________________
AOM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
heart wrote:
Sönam wrote:
I like the term Ripe ... because after a while it becomes Rotten

Sönam


That might be true for mango's, not Guru's though. The 4th vision is even better. :smile:

/magnus



We can consider the fourth vision, the exhaustion of dharmatā, rotten. So indeed a rotten guru is even better than a ripe one.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group