The Seeker wrote:Thanks for the replies.
Padma, I thought that the statues and stupas, as well as the Dharma text were to be considered Holy objects that deserve respect. I take it as it is stuff, in a store until you purchase it and it has been placed in a place of respect.
But then again, that's just a new comers understanding I guess.![]()
Adamantine, thank you![]()
Kindest wishes, Dave

The Seeker wrote:Thanks for the replies.
Padma, I thought that the statues and stupas, as well as the Dharma text were to be considered Holy objects that deserve respect. I take it as it is stuff, in a store until you purchase it and it has been placed in a place of respect.
But then again, that's just a new comers understanding I guess.![]()
Adamantine, thank you![]()
Kindest wishes, Dave

Fa Dao wrote:Namdrol,
I have heard that before from other teachers. Why is that?

Namdrol wrote:Fa Dao wrote:Namdrol,
I have heard that before from other teachers. Why is that?
It is because people screw in their bedrooms.
Fa Dao wrote:yeaaaah...ok..I get that. I was just wondering why that is considered bad?
PadmaVonSamba wrote:If nobody had ever mentioned it to you, it wouldn't have mattered.
There is nothing bad bout sex, but some people feel that, for instance, the dining room table is not an appropriate location, because we associate that space with eating food. So, it is sort of like this.
So, maybe the bedroom is not the best place to set up a shrine,
but having a shrine in the bedroom is different than making out in a shrine room.
But then , getting mushy in a shrine room is different than getting shiny on a mushroom.
.
.
.
Namdrol wrote:People screw in their bedrooms
Adamantine wrote:don't Buddha's pervade space? Can we really hide our screwing from them? This kind of orthodoxy gets a bit dualistically fixated.
Users browsing this forum: deff, MalaBeads, PadmaVonSamba and 9 guests