Namdrol wrote:Pero wrote:
So I really doubt whatever anyone who doesn't respect his teachers says.
Of course. But I also would doubt what a teacher who does not respect his students says.
Good point.
Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
Namdrol wrote:Pero wrote:
So I really doubt whatever anyone who doesn't respect his teachers says.
Of course. But I also would doubt what a teacher who does not respect his students says.
Namdrol wrote:[
This is no guarantee that the teacher, once found, will be a good one, a qualified one. If that teacher does not measure up to Dharma standards, he or she should be dropped like a hot coal from one's hands.
Jax wrote:Namdrol, what do think of Germano's research regarding sPyti being a reaction to the tantric elements being so broadly integrated into Dzogchen?
Namdrol wrote:deepbluehum wrote:Okay. I have one question about samaya. What if the teacher falls into dualistic grasping in a such a way as to buy into a common run of the mill worldly point of view that the student thinks is petty?
The student should mind his own business.
deepbluehum wrote:Namdrol wrote:deepbluehum wrote:Okay. I have one question about samaya. What if the teacher falls into dualistic grasping in a such a way as to buy into a common run of the mill worldly point of view that the student thinks is petty?
The student should mind his own business.
What if the teacher exhibits greed?
Namdrol wrote:Greed may be a failing but it is not a cause for a Vajrayāna student to criticize their teacher.
Sönam wrote:Namdrol wrote:Greed may be a failing but it is not a cause for a Vajrayāna student to criticize their teacher.
That's why it's important to ponderate ... and not to excessively enter in a cycle of opinion, jugement and so on. Most of the discomfort could be resolved by spliting without necessarly providing a commentary. Of course if a guru is outrageously lying or abusing it should be reported ... but except for that, the best is only to quit.
Sönam
Sönam wrote:Namdrol wrote:Greed may be a failing but it is not a cause for a Vajrayāna student to criticize their teacher.
That's why it's important to ponderate ... and not to excessively enter in a cycle of opinion, jugement and so on. Most of the discomfort could be resolved by spliting without necessarly providing a commentary. Of course if a guru is outrageously lying or abusing it should be reported ... but except for that, the best is only to quit.
PadmaVonSamba wrote:
Sometimes what appears to a student as something negative is based on the limited understanding of the student.
PadmaVonSamba wrote:If you are honest with your teacher, I think you should be up front with him (her). I am very fortunate to have the teachers that I have, and have had in the past, and while I have never found fault with them, I am generally pretty direct with any issues that concern me. I will get right up in the teacher's face sometimes, if it is really an issue I have trouble with. And if something smells like yak poop, I tell them it smells like yak poop.
It is deadly important to be honest with yourself, and with your teachers. I think honesty is the foundation of samaya. A good teacher respects honesty in a student. So often, a lama runs into a lot of people who are all full of smiles and prostrations and outwardly display a kind of ridiculously "obedient" face, but below the surface, there is nothing. Don't you think a good teacher can see through this charade? If anybody thinks they are going to upset their teacher by being honest with them, then they must think their teacher is pretty wobbly. Why would you study with a wobbly teacher?
Be honest, and laugh about it later.
.
Namdrol wrote:PadmaVonSamba wrote:
Sometimes what appears to a student as something negative is based on the limited understanding of the student.
It is possible to slide a lot of bullshit under this rug.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests