Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:07 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 821
Quote:
Arhats, praytyekabuddhas, bodhisattvas are not fully enlighthened buddhas. And in Vajrayana, those buddhas on the 11th and 12th bhumis are considered not fully awakened.


Thanks for your reply. Just to clear up the confusion are saying that these Arhats, Praytyekabuddhas, and Bodhisattvas all revert back to ignorance after the destruction of the universe?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Ryoto wrote:
Quote:
Arhats, praytyekabuddhas, bodhisattvas are not fully enlighthened buddhas. And in Vajrayana, those buddhas on the 11th and 12th bhumis are considered not fully awakened.


Thanks for your reply. Just to clear up the confusion are saying that these Arhats, Praytyekabuddhas, and Bodhisattvas all revert back to ignorance after the destruction of the universe?


Not necessarily, they revert to the basis.

N

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:28 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
padma norbu wrote:
whatever floats your boat...
It's not about floating ones boat. It's not about a warm, hazy and fuzzy feeling. It's about stark, clear, bright (almost to the point of painful) awareness. In some cases this may bring an even stronger and more raw sensual (as in, of the senses) experience of suffering, but also a more heightened experience of joy. I've heard it said that Avalokitesvaras head burst into a thousand pieces whilst contemplating the unending suffering of sentient beings, this though did not make him want to "pack up and leave". To "end it all". On the contrary, it fortified his intention to help them all.

Ego wants to "pack it in" at the first sign of difficulty, Bodhicitta wants to "slug it out" to the very end. Make your choice, face the music and quit whining.
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:58 pm
Posts: 1428
Namdrol wrote:
Not necessarily, they revert to the basis.


So this is what happens for them at the end of a Kalpa or Mahakalpa.... What about at the end of a Pralaya or Mahapralaya? Do Buddhas who have not reached full enlightenment fall into ignorance again? It depends on if they recognize the movement of the Five Lights as their own display when the Basis stirs, yes? Even if Buddhas who have not reached full enlightenment do not recognize the Five Lights as their own display at the end of a "Great Cosmic Night" ("The Bardo of Samsara and Nirvana"), wouldn't they still, even if only 'subconsciously', retain some 'memory' of the attainments they had acheived during the previous "Great Cosmic Day" ("Samsara and Nirvana turn their backs to one another")?


Last edited by Lhug-Pa on Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Lhug-Pa wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
Not necessarily, they revert to the basis.


So this is what happens for them at the end of a Kalpa or Mahakalpa.... What about at the end of a Pralaya or Mahapralaya?


They revert to the basis at the end of the mahakalpa. The dissolition of the universe, pralaya, happens between great eons.

Quote:
Do Buddhas who have not reached full enlightenment fall into ignorance again?


No, there are no buddhas or sentient beings in the basis, there is no falling into ignorance per se, since there is no ignorance in the basis either. In any event, this type of cosmology is useless for most people's practice.

N

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:58 pm
Posts: 1428
To clarify, the end of a Mahakalpa = the beginning of a Mahapralaya.

The end of a Mahapralaya = the beginning of a Mahakalpa.

You said that at the end of a Mahakalpa (beginning of a Mahapralaya), Arhats, Pratyekabuddhas, and Bodhisattvas below the 12th Bhumi, etc. revert to the Basis.

So my question is what about at the end of a Mahapralaya (beginning of a Mahakalpa)? This is when the Basis begins to stir right? In other words, the period of 'repose' between Eons is just that, a period of 'repose' (Mahapralaya), during which, as you've said, Buddhas who have not reached full Enlightenment revert to the Basis. And at the end of the Mahapralaya is when the Basis begins to stir signifying the beginning of a Mahakalpa (?)

The questions asked in my previous post are in the context of this understanding.

In other words, we've discussed what 'happens' with Buddhas who have not achieved full Enlightenment at the end of a Mahakalpa, but we haven't discussed what 'happens' (or what could 'happen') with them at the end of a Mahapralaya.

Although I'm sure you've written about this in at least one of the many, many ( ;) ) discussions here regarding the Basis.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:04 am
Posts: 821
Namdrol, probably a stupid question but can a fully enlightened Buddha ever revert back to ignorance if he wanted to?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 1999
gregkavarnos wrote:
padma norbu wrote:
whatever floats your boat...
It's not about floating ones boat. It's not about a warm, hazy and fuzzy feeling. It's about stark, clear, bright (almost to the point of painful) awareness. In some cases this may bring an even stronger and more raw sensual (as in, of the senses) experience of suffering, but also a more heightened experience of joy. I've heard it said that Avalokitesvaras head burst into a thousand pieces whilst contemplating the unending suffering of sentient beings, this though did not make him want to "pack up and leave". To "end it all". On the contrary, it fortified his intention to help them all.

Ego wants to "pack it in" at the first sign of difficulty, Bodhicitta wants to "slug it out" to the very end. Make your choice, face the music and quit whining.
:namaste:


Eeeeeeesshh.

_________________
"Use what seems like poison as medicine. We can use our personal suffering as the path to compassion for all beings." Pema Chodron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:51 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
If it's the self-indulgent whining of a psychoanalytical session you want, I can (have been trained to) do that schtick too. But I get paid by the hour to listening to ego-centred "...it's all my mummies fault" crap.

In closing, have you considered getting elocution lessons? It'll help you get past the groans and wheezes which you utilise to express yourself.
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 1999
Whatever floats your boat...

_________________
"Use what seems like poison as medicine. We can use our personal suffering as the path to compassion for all beings." Pema Chodron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 1999
Looking forward to Namdrol's response to Lhug-Pa and Ryoto's posts above.

_________________
"Use what seems like poison as medicine. We can use our personal suffering as the path to compassion for all beings." Pema Chodron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Lhug-Pa wrote:
]And at the end of the Mahapralaya is when the Basis begins to stir signifying the beginning of a Mahakalpa (?)
.



Yes.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:58 am
Posts: 299
gregkavarnos wrote:
If it's the self-indulgent whining of a psychoanalytical session you want, I can (have been trained to) do that schtick too. But I get paid by the hour to listening to ego-centred "...it's all my mummies fault" crap.

In closing, have you considered getting elocution lessons? It'll help you get past the groans and wheezes which you utilise to express yourself.
:namaste:


Do you work as a psychotherapist?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:58 pm
Posts: 1428
gregkavarnos wrote:
have you considered getting elocution lessons?


So that's what Toastmasters is. I've considered it before. Actually heard good things about Toastmasters. :cheers:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:11 am
Posts: 614
Location: Oregon
I just don't see how fine points of abstraction are of use to anybody but the most advanced practitioners. I know I'm not the only one who sometimes uses study as a way to get out of actual practice. It's so much more interesting to talk about the theoretical destruction of all the buddhas than to sit on your butt. I hope you're not doing the same thing, padma norbu!

_________________
Namu Amida Butsu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 1999
duckfiasco wrote:
I just don't see how fine points of abstraction are of use to anybody but the most advanced practitioners. I know I'm not the only one who sometimes uses study as a way to get out of actual practice. It's so much more interesting to talk about the theoretical destruction of all the buddhas than to sit on your butt. I hope you're not doing the same thing, padma norbu!


I like to sit on my butt. It's an open dialog in which I haven't said much other than to basically agree with someone in a general way (my second post) and to point out something Namdrol discussed earlier, which he has come to clarify. Nobody is forcing anyone to be a part of this conversation.

_________________
"Use what seems like poison as medicine. We can use our personal suffering as the path to compassion for all beings." Pema Chodron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 10:57 am
Posts: 269
Location: Bangkok Thailand
:shrug:
Without reading through 5 pages of posts...can I ask why you originally got the idea that Nirvana (wherever or whatever that is) would "snuff out your life"?
Perhaps "free you from the cycle of birth and re-birth"...but that is not the same as "snuffing out your life", is it?
Now I have my own personal views on such things as "Nirvana" and "escaping fom the cycle of birth and rebirth", but that's not the point here.
So let's just say I'm very far from an expert on the matter...and anyhow my views are merely my personal views which very well may be wrong.
But thinking of "entering" some place or thing that is called "Nirvana"...and least of all... having that event "snuff out your life" ...seems rather strange to me.
Again, just my opinion.
:smile:

_________________
Shame on you Shakyamuni for setting the precedent of leaving home.
Did you think it was not there--
in your wife's lovely face
in your baby's laughter?
Did you think you had to go elsewhere (simply) to find it?
from - Judyth Collin
The Layman's Lament
From What Book, 1998, p. 52
Edited by Gary Gach


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 1999
I absolutely never said that.

_________________
"Use what seems like poison as medicine. We can use our personal suffering as the path to compassion for all beings." Pema Chodron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 1999
Lhug-Pa wrote:
As I think was mentioned in your other thread, when everything is destroyed at the end of a Kalpa, Mahamanvantara, etc., the Universe goes into a repose called Mahapralaya ("the Bardo of Samsara and Nirvana"); and from what I understand, at the end of a Mahapralaya when the Universe starts forming again, Buddhas who have attained complete Buddhahood in the previous Kalpa or Mahamanvantara will not fall into Samsara again unless they allow themselves to fall. This is how it's explained in Occultism, so I don't know if there are any Buddhist scriptures that either contradict or agree with this. And we've heard of those who only reach Buddhahood 'that reverts to the cause' and these are the ones who would have a higher chance of falling back into Samsara after the end of a Mahapralaya.


It doesn't really matter either way to me as far as making the whole thing more or less pointless. If there will always be samsaric beings and the compassion of the Buddhas, it basically is still an endless trap. You're either suffering in samsara or committed to helping those who are. Forever. There doesn't seem to be a third option. For the third or fourth time now, i'll say Buddhahood is the best option given the circumstances, but if given the option of complete and total annihilation of all trace of my existence, I would choose the latter just based on the pointlessness of it. A gentle reminder: if anyone does not like this discussion, they don't have to participate.

_________________
"Use what seems like poison as medicine. We can use our personal suffering as the path to compassion for all beings." Pema Chodron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:36 am 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
It seems that it's not so much a matter of people not liking the discussion, it seems to be more a matter of you not liking the answers you are getting. Since your preferred option: "complete and total annihilation of all trace of my existence" in this situation (samsara) is not applicable, then it's not really an option is it? That only leaves the other two options: 1. continue suffering 2. gain liberation. For me (and for Buddhists in general, it seems) the choice is quite clear. So of what value is (what is the point of) the discusssion then? (ie what do you want to hear?)
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dan74, Inge, Saoshun, yan kong and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group