I'm trying to understand how the concept of Progressive Buddhism differs from Engaged Buddhism. Here, we have an argument that PB and EB are identical:
http://progressivebuddhism.blogspot.com ... gaged.html
although I suspect that it may be possible for a Buddhist to hold politically progressive positions (a set of convictions) without practicing in the world in an engaged way (putting those felt convictions into practice).
Can anyone help a guy out and clarify what Progressive Buddhism is vis a vis Engaged Buddhism?

