Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
Karinos wrote:a bit about Karma Kagyu history.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz8Lz-RHHEg
interesting at 1:20 what Karmapa says about Shamarpa and how he respects him.
Dhondrub wrote:
karinos, are you mac sz?
best
tashi
Karinos wrote:Dhondrub wrote:
karinos, are you mac sz?
best
tashi
indeed

Caz wrote:You Kagyu's are very lucky to have 2 Karmapa's both are great teachers from what I have witnessed. Has anyone seen HH Sharmapas recent letters ?
heart wrote:kirtu wrote:Unfortunately the Sharmapa is freaking me out with his claim that Westerners shouldn't practice deity yoga.
But I have to keep an open mind ....
Kirt[/quote
Yes, it is strange. But, Mahayana have a lot of less complications than the Vajrayana. Compassion and emptiness is a great combo.
/magnus
superfast
....heart wrote:kirtu wrote:Unfortunately the Sharmapa is freaking me out with his claim that Westerners shouldn't practice deity yoga.
But I have to keep an open mind ....
Kirt
Yes, it is strange. But, Mahayana have a lot of less complications than the Vajrayana. Compassion and emptiness is a great combo.
/magnus
kirtu wrote:heart wrote:
Yes, it is strange. But, Mahayana have a lot of less complications than the Vajrayana. Compassion and emptiness is a great combo.
/magnus
![]()
![]()
But Three Countless Eon's is too long - we have to purify all negativities right now,superfast
....
Kirt
Kilaya. wrote:Karmapa - Two Ways of Divinity
http://vimeo.com/19148869
The most unbiased documentary movie about the two Karmapas I've ever seen.
heart wrote:pemachophel wrote:Sherabpa,
Why exactly do you say that there can't be two Karmapas? The famous Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo Rinpoche had at least five tulkus. There are numerous other lines of tulkus where there are more than one. Another example are the three lines of Pema Lingpa tulkus: Body, Speech, and Mind.
I'd just like to know your reasoning for saying that, when it comes of the Karmapa, there can be only one valid tulku. Thanks.
Also, Tulku Urgyen said there could be two Karmapa's, already from the beginning.
/magnus
sherabpa wrote:
It does not follow that there could not ever be two Karmapas at any point in time.

Your reasoning is completely flawed. If both claimants have authentic Kagyu Lamas that say they are Karmapa then neither Karmapa is fake and the "true" Karmapa for each individual is based on which "high lama" they happen to agree with. Anyway you are also wrong on another count: there are "high lama" that believe both of the candidates are authentic, Beru Khyentse (long life to him!) is one of the supporters of this position.sherabpa wrote:We must avoid hostility and respect the fact that both claimants have their authentic Kagyu lamas who say they are Karmapa. But there is no fault in saying that one of the claimants is a fake, for this is to agree with what all the high lamas say.

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Konchog1, namoh and 7 guests