ram peswani wrote:Noah wrote:Noah wrote:I think I understand what you are saying here, let me try to say it again in a way that can be better understood
I ask- are the 2 "cosmic energies" you are refering to the yin/yang energy? This basic dualism?
I love the Dharma and believe in no "creator god" or any "G"od. I am if the same mind as well that if there is a figure to be worshiped as a guide it is the Eternal Buddha of the Lotus Sutra. Thank you for sharing and I think it is some truth in how you describe the differences in Awareness here. Example: many have an understanding of cause/effect, conditionality, rebirth and karma. When there is a belief in God- many subtle aspects of "reality" remain misunderstood as "God consciousness."
we in India say Shiva and Shakti
Yin/ yang is probably chinese.
Adam and eve is what christians call.
In nature they are Male and female
Male retains the ego, female devotion and service
Aemilius wrote:In buddhist tantra it is different, male is Means (upaya) and female is Wisdom (prajña).
Noah wrote:Hey Aemilius! Vajayana Buddhism and Tibetan are systematic methods of practice that use deep understanding of Dharma and individualized mind training to develop insights and liberation. I heard it put like this from a Rinpoche (paraphrased)- A serious Tantric practitioner first must study the Hinayana for 12 years, then Mahayana for 6, outer Tantra for 10 then can enter the Highest Tantra practice. I believe the understanding here is that the great Dharma has evolved. Has and will continue to evolve, ALL point to liberation/Enlightenment in accordance to what has come before it.
The Lotus Sutra is far more universal than any tantric teaching.ram peswani wrote:
we in India say Shiva and Shakti
Yin/ yang is probably chinese.
Adam and eve is what christians call.
In nature they are Male and female
Male retains the ego, female devotion and service
Aemilius wrote:In buddhist tantra it is different, male is Means (upaya) and female is Wisdom (prajña).
...nor it is to regurgitate or rehash historical or traditional understandings of the Sutra. We can only try to expound the Lotus Sutra as our direct, individual understanding of the Buddha's teaching (Dharma).
plwk wrote:...nor it is to regurgitate or rehash historical or traditional understandings of the Sutra. We can only try to expound the Lotus Sutra as our direct, individual understanding of the Buddha's teaching (Dharma).
Interesting...and the constant regurgitation of your ideas here is any better than reproducing works of scholars and masters on the same Sutra? Both have their own platforms and merits, no? Or is this the case of upholding one and disparaging the other?
Ngawang Drolma wrote:Here is a link to The Lotus Sutra text.
The Lotus Sutra or Sutra on the White Lotus of the Sublime Dharma is one of the most popular and influential Mahayana sutras in Asia and the basis on which the Tien Tai and Nichiren sects of Buddhism were established.
-History and background-
The Lotus Sutra was probably compiled in the first century BCE in Kashmir, India some 500 years after the death of Shakyamuni Buddha. Therefore, it is not included in the more ancient Āgamas nor in the parallel Sutta Pitaka of the Theravada Buddhists, both of which represent the older Buddhist scriptures which to a greater degree of certainty can be historically linked to the Buddha himself.
The Lotus Sutra purports to be a discourse delivered by the Buddha toward the end of his life. The tradition in Mahayana states that the Lotus Sutra was written down at the time of the Buddha and stored for five hundred years in the realm of the dragons (or Nagas). After this, they were reintroduced into the human realm at the time of the Fourth Buddhist Council in Kashmir. The tradition further claims that the teachings of the Lotus Sutra are higher than the teachings contained in the agamas and the Sutta Pitaka (the Sutra itself also claims this), and that humankind had been unable to understand the Lotus Sutra at the time of the Buddha (500 BCE).
These scholars have not released much on early fragments, except to say that they are not dependent on the Chinese or Tibetan Lotus sutras. Furthermore, other scholars have noted how the cryptic Dharani passages within the Lotus sutra represent a form of the Magadhi dialect that is more similar to Pali than Sanskrit. For instance, one Dharani reads in part: "Buddhavilokite Dharmaparikshite". Although the vilo is attested in Sanskrit, it appears first in the Buddhist Pali texts as "vilokita" with the meaning of "a vigilant looker" from vi, meaning eager like a passionless bird, and lok, meaning "look".
Source
Leo Rivers wrote:I stumbled into this translation of the words. Unlike the Prajnaparamita mantra which makes a straightforwards sense, this mystifies me.
For some reason it reminds me of an oracle designed with sections assigned to predict the status of the four stages of yoga practice.
From: http://www.mahajrya.org/daily.php
Sanskrit, then English
This looks like an oracle capable of giving alternative advice to discipline (approach)
adande Without punishment
dandapati Lord of the stick
dandavarte forbid by threat of punishment
dandakushale auspicious sticks
dandasudhare improvement stick
This looks like an oracle of measuring progress (close approach)
sudhare improvement
sudharapati Lord of improvement
buddhapashyane awakened rampart (of conscious stone)
sarvadharani-avartani complete spell repeated
sarvandhashyavartani complete service repeated
su-avartani moving repetition
This looks like an oracle of group practice (accomplishment)
samghaparikshani group of investigation
samghanarghatani group of hero’s warding
asamge from non-unity
samgapagate we come together
tri-adhvasamgatulya triple journey of the group
arate-prapty distant reach
savasamga samatikrante setting in motion the group crossing over
This looks like an oracle of accomplishment (great accomplishment)
sarvadharma suparikshite all dharmas well examined
sarvasattva rutakaushalyanugate complete being, resonating silk following
simhavikridite powerful one’s plaything
![]()
Users browsing this forum: cdpatton, kirtu, PRR and 4 guests