Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
SARVA MANGALAM
Without clairvoyance, we cannot work for other sentient beings - Khunu Lama
Suddenly you will know the different knowledge without study - Thog-'bebs
One may now accomplish the welfare and instruction of all sentient beings, spontaneously and without effort, by simply being, that is to say, by manifesting one's enlightened nature through spontaneously emanating an infinity of Nirmanakaya manifestations - Vajranatha
wisdomfire wrote:If there is no other way to dispose but to burn, what should we do?
Lhug-Pa wrote:It was either Lama Zopa or Lama Yeshe who said that we can recite OM AH HUM while we burn Dharma materials, and see that the smoke is empowered by OM AH HUM and benefits sentient beings as it is dispersed in the air.
A more complete explanation is found on one of the websites dedicated to the teachings of Lama Yeshe.

Dechen Norbu wrote:wisdomfire wrote:If there is no other way to dispose but to burn, what should we do?
Burning is a correct way of disposing of Dharma materials, so don't worry.
Give it away to a Dharma Centerwisdomfire wrote:Thanks for all the answers. I just learnt from a teacher that we can recite the Essence of Interdependence mantra (if you know it) while burning and visualise that all the materials dissolve into the Dharmadhatu. One can also recite OM AH HUM and visualise the benefits to all sentient beings. A source say that Gurus/Deities/Stupas/Holy Objects photos should not be burnt, another source say that it can be burn as it is not higher than Dharma texts.
Just sharing with all if anyone needs to do this.
Some people have so much Dharma materials and we should also plan properly what to do with it before we pass on. It is not good to leave it for others (eg, relatives/children) to clear up and then they may create bad karma for themselves and you. I'm trying to clear my stuff gradually.
wisdomfire wrote: A source say that Gurus/Deities/Stupas/Holy Objects photos should not be burnt, another source say that it can be burn as it is not higher than Dharma texts.
Blue Garuda wrote:wisdomfire wrote: A source say that Gurus/Deities/Stupas/Holy Objects photos should not be burnt, another source say that it can be burn as it is not higher than Dharma texts.
I guess the methods will need to catch up with recent technology - or disposing of your PC hard drive and deleting materials online must be regarded as in some way disrespecful? Maybe there is a virtual fire website where you can burn virtual materials!
I also ask what is sacred - the paper, the china clay, the ink, the glue? The Amazon Kindle?
We now have many methods of disposal and should seek to improve on what was done hundreds of years ago in very different times to suit different circumstances.
Eve tried burning books so that nothing that remains is readable any more? I can't imagine that Buddha had much to say about it as scripture was orally transmitted at that time, and if he was to teach about it now, would he really want people to spend hours disposing of Dharma materials rather than studying and applying it?
You can chant mantras while you shred. Being mindful is what is important, not the method, IMHO.

Blue Garuda wrote:Plenty of hairs to split over what is 'tangible' . LOL
It's vaguely connected with statue filling and whether an sd card with millions of mantras as text or mp3 files is OK to insert , and meaningful. Humans have progressed from writing on cave walls, to animal skins, papyrus, paper etc. so why do we want to arrest progress in terms of what we may regard as sacred? Surely it is the message (the Dharma) which makes the item sacred, not what the medium is made of.
We impute through inference that an object is sacred and to be respected, so maybe a process of 'deconsecration' could replace destruction of all but those items which are, for example, 'secret mantra'. Deconsecrated texts could then simply be recycled.
It seems pretty arbitrary at the moment, anyway. One Guru may advise that a poster for a Buddhist event is Dharma material, another may not. The Dalai Lama and his followers publish huge numbers of Dharma books. I haven't seen any Dharma book in English which carries an instruction to dispose of the text by burning, although there may well be some, so does this mean the authors don't see their books as Dharma materials? Personally I do, becuase that is what I was taught.
In the end, if we can, it is best to ask the Guru what should be regarded as 'Dharma' material and how it should be disposed of, and take no notice of idiots like me on a web forum! LOL
Pema Rigdzin wrote:Blue Garuda wrote:Plenty of hairs to split over what is 'tangible' . LOL
It's vaguely connected with statue filling and whether an sd card with millions of mantras as text or mp3 files is OK to insert , and meaningful. Humans have progressed from writing on cave walls, to animal skins, papyrus, paper etc. so why do we want to arrest progress in terms of what we may regard as sacred? Surely it is the message (the Dharma) which makes the item sacred, not what the medium is made of.
We impute through inference that an object is sacred and to be respected, so maybe a process of 'deconsecration' could replace destruction of all but those items which are, for example, 'secret mantra'. Deconsecrated texts could then simply be recycled.
It seems pretty arbitrary at the moment, anyway. One Guru may advise that a poster for a Buddhist event is Dharma material, another may not. The Dalai Lama and his followers publish huge numbers of Dharma books. I haven't seen any Dharma book in English which carries an instruction to dispose of the text by burning, although there may well be some, so does this mean the authors don't see their books as Dharma materials? Personally I do, becuase that is what I was taught.
In the end, if we can, it is best to ask the Guru what should be regarded as 'Dharma' material and how it should be disposed of, and take no notice of idiots like me on a web forum! LOL
I guess I've seen too many lamas use media from microfiche to DVDs in lieu of printed pages of mantras/cycles of teachings for placing in stupas and statues to even wonder if putting mantras on an SD card is ok or meaningful. It seems pretty obvious to me that it is.
In terms of whether a printed material of any kind related to Dharma is or isn't "sacred," it also seems obvious to me. I've yet to read a commentary explaining refuge where it failed to say something like "after taking refuge, one considers even a scrap of the monastic robes as the Sangha, or even a single letter of Dharma as the Dharma, so one respects them accordingly."
Blue Garuda wrote: I wondered about the karma of people who read a Dharma text and, just like any other paperback, chuck it in the garbage.
Blue Garuda wrote:Yes, I agree, and I guess most here on DW would also. I still wince when I see people enter a gompa, sit straight down and plonk their sadhanas, books and malas on the floor.
Blue Garuda wrote:I wondered about the karma of people who read a Dharma text and, just like any other paperback, chuck it in the garbage. Should there be some sort of kind note as a preface?
Users browsing this forum: Glasswalker and 3 guests