The "not" in "not eating" is non-affirmative. If you can't see that, then there is no way I can make you see my logic.gad rgyangs wrote:a shoe is an object, recognition and non-recognition are not.Sherab wrote:Following your logic:gad rgyangs wrote:if recognition is a phenomena, then failure to recognize is also a phenomena. The question is: are all phenomena of samsara and nirvana appearances of the basis? And if not, then what is there besides the basis and its appearances?
If shoe is a phenomenon,
then no shoe is also a phenomenon.
If eating is a process that is a phenomenon,
then not eating is also a process that is a phenomenon.
if you're not eating, then you're doing something else, both of which are processes.
Ground of Being
Re: Ground of Being
Re: Ground of Being
All phenomena of samsara and nirvana are appearances of the basis.gad rgyangs wrote:The question is: are all phenomena of samsara and nirvana appearances of the basis? And if not, then what is there besides the basis and its appearances?
With samsara, there is the absence of the phenomenon of recognition. With nirvana, there is the phenomenon of recognition.
This is why in the basis it is said that there is no ignorance. Heck, there is no basis to label the basis as a phenomenon even, let alone an absence of a phenomenon that we label as ignorance.
- gad rgyangs
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm
Re: Ground of Being
i see your logic, but it has nothing to do with the topic here. since recognizing would actually be the natural state, and non-recognizing an active distortion, your analogy is exactly backwards.Sherab wrote: The "not" in "not eating" is non-affirmative. If you can't see that, then there is no way I can make you see my logic.
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
- gad rgyangs
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm
Re: Ground of Being
dont let Namdrol hear you talking like that: he'll bite your head off.Sherab wrote: All phenomena of samsara and nirvana are appearances of the basis.
I think you mean to say "with the absence of the phenomena of recognition, there is samsara"..etc. No one is saying there is ignorance in the basis, we are discussing whether the non-recognition that gives rise to samsara is part of the display/appearances of the basis (gzhi snang).With samsara, there is the absence of the phenomenon of recognition. With nirvana, there is the phenomenon of recognition.
This is why in the basis it is said that there is no ignorance.
No one is labeling the basis as a phenomenon, it is rather the potential for all phenomena to manifest.Heck, there is no basis to label the basis as a phenomenon even, let alone an absence of a phenomenon that we label as ignorance.
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
Re: Ground of Being
I've missed one step then ?gad rgyangs wrote:dont let Namdrol hear you talking like that: he'll bite your head off.Sherab wrote: All phenomena of samsara and nirvana are appearances of the basis.
Ho!
Everything - appearance and existence, samsara and nirvana -
Has a single ground, yet two paths and two fruitions,
And magically dispays as awareness or unawareness
Through Samantabhadra's prayer, may all beings become buddhas,
completely perfected in
The abode of the dharmadhatu.
The ground of all is uncompounded,
And the self-arising great expanse, beyond expression,
Has neither the name "samsara" nor "nirvana".
Realizing just this, you are a buddha;
Not realizing this, you are a being wandering in samsara.
Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
- gad rgyangs
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm
Re: Ground of Being
maybe you've missed Namdrol's posts on pg 4 of this thread.Sönam wrote:I've missed one step then ?gad rgyangs wrote:dont let Namdrol hear you talking like that: he'll bite your head off.Sherab wrote: All phenomena of samsara and nirvana are appearances of the basis.
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
Re: Ground of Being
You did not see the logic.gad rgyangs wrote:i see your logic, but it has nothing to do with the topic here. since recognizing would actually be the natural state, and non-recognizing an active distortion, your analogy is exactly backwards.Sherab wrote: The "not" in "not eating" is non-affirmative. If you can't see that, then there is no way I can make you see my logic.
The natural state is the natural state regardless of recognition or non-recognition.
When there is recognition of the natural state, then there is the state of buddhahood.
When there is an absence of the recognition of the natural state, then there is the state of sentient being.
Re: Ground of Being
I don't care.gad rgyangs wrote:dont let Namdrol hear you talking like that: he'll bite your head off.Sherab wrote: All phenomena of samsara and nirvana are appearances of the basis.
If you hold that there is no ignorance in the basis, then we are in agreement.gad rgyangs wrote:I think you mean to say "with the absence of the phenomena of recognition, there is samsara"..etc. No one is saying there is ignorance in the basis, we are discussing whether the non-recognition that gives rise to samsara is part of the display/appearances of the basis (gzhi snang).Sherab wrote: With samsara, there is the absence of the phenomenon of recognition. With nirvana, there is the phenomenon of recognition.
This is why in the basis it is said that there is no ignorance.
If you hold that the basis is not a phenomenon, then I have no problem here.gad rgyangs wrote:No one is labeling the basis as a phenomenon, it is rather the potential for all phenomena to manifest.Sherab wrote: Heck, there is no basis to label the basis as a phenomenon even, let alone an absence of a phenomenon that we label as ignorance.
Re: Ground of Being
Then we do not share the same understanding, what I can see on that page is ...gad rgyangs wrote:maybe you've missed Namdrol's posts on pg 4 of this thread.Sönam wrote: I've missed one step then ?
... and for ignorance being not an appearance of the basis, it's what I've tried to say on previous posts (and it seems that's also what Sherab is trying to say).Namdrol wrote:I did not refuse to acknowledge that. Pay attention to what I said-- "ignorance is not an appearance of the basis".gad rgyangs wrote: if Namdrol refuses to acknowledge that "all phenomena of samsara and nirvana" are appearances of the basis
and I've also noticed that on the same page ... it may help!
SönamNamdrol wrote:But, as I said before, it is not appropriate to argue and debate about Dzogchen.
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
- gad rgyangs
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm
Re: Ground of Being
first you post this quote (presumably from a tantra?):
then you quote Namdrol, apparently approvingly:Everything - appearance and existence, samsara and nirvana -
Has a single ground, yet two paths and two fruitions,
And magically dispays as awareness or unawareness
perhaps you'd like to explain how you do not see two as completely contradictory?Namdrol wrote:"ignorance is not an appearance of the basis".
this attitude has no precedence in the tradition, and smacks of jonestown kool-aid if you ask me. It's also particularly hilarious coming from Namdrol, who has how-many-thousands of posts here, arguing and debating about everything under the sun, including Dzogchen?and I've also noticed that on the same page ... it may help!
Namdrol wrote:But, as I said before, it is not appropriate to argue and debate about Dzogchen.
Last edited by gad rgyangs on Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
- gad rgyangs
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm
Re: Ground of Being
you keep arguing points that no one here is disagreeing with. why not address the original point:Sherab wrote:You did not see the logic.gad rgyangs wrote:i see your logic, but it has nothing to do with the topic here. since recognizing would actually be the natural state, and non-recognizing an active distortion, your analogy is exactly backwards.Sherab wrote: The "not" in "not eating" is non-affirmative. If you can't see that, then there is no way I can make you see my logic.
The natural state is the natural state regardless of recognition or non-recognition.
When there is recognition of the natural state, then there is the state of buddhahood.
When there is an absence of the recognition of the natural state, then there is the state of sentient being.
my contention is that all phenomena of samsara and nirvana, including ignorance, are the display of the basis. If you agree with this, there is no dispute. If you don't agree with this, please explain how ignorance is not included in "all phenomena of samsara and nirvana"
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
Re: Ground of Being
This is the famous Prayer of Kuntuzangpo (here in the translation of Erik Pema Kuntzang that you can found in the "Quintessential Dzogchen")gad rgyangs wrote:first you post this quote (presumably from a tantra?):
Everything - appearance and existence, samsara and nirvana -
Has a single ground, yet two paths and two fruitions,
And magically dispays as awareness or unawareness
nice try ... perhaps "you" can explain how you do see those two as completely contradictory
then you quote Namdrol, apparently approvingly:
perhaps you'd like to explain how you do not see two as completely contradictory?Namdrol wrote:"ignorance is not an appearance of the basis".
Namdrol has already answered to that, "ignorance is prior to the appearance of samsara and nirvana"
There is a reason why it is not appropriate ... and it's somehow underlying in this discussion ...this attitude has no precedence in the tradition, and smacks of jonestown kool-aid if you ask me.and I've also noticed that on the same page ... it may help!
Namdrol wrote:But, as I said before, it is not appropriate to argue and debate about Dzogchen.
Sönam
By understanding everything you perceive from the perspective of the view, you are freed from the constraints of philosophical beliefs.
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
By understanding that any and all mental activity is meditation, you are freed from arbitrary divisions between formal sessions and postmeditation activity.
- Longchen Rabjam -
Re: Ground of Being
(FYI, Ground-presencing is Germano's translation of gzhi snang, straying='khrul pa (confusion), dimmed awareness=ma rig pa)Tshigdon Mdzod (David Germano translation) wrote:Although this presencing process manifests thus within it, the Ground-presencing's own condition remains utterly devoid of straying and non-straying being established as such. From the Garland of Precious Pearls Tantra:
Since nothing can be imputed as "dimmed awareness"
Withing the great Ground-presencing,
It isn't the case that straying is established therein.
...
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar
- Shabkar
- gad rgyangs
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm
Re: Ground of Being
the key word here is "established", which of course nothing in samsara or nirvana is. the dzogchen trope is "clearly appearing but not existent/established".Pero wrote:(FYI, Ground-presencing is Germano's translation of gzhi snang, straying='khrul pa (confusion), dimmed awareness=ma rig pa)Tshigdon Mdzod (David Germano translation) wrote:Although this presencing process manifests thus within it, the Ground-presencing's own condition remains utterly devoid of straying and non-straying being established as such. From the Garland of Precious Pearls Tantra:
Since nothing can be imputed as "dimmed awareness"
Withing the great Ground-presencing,
It isn't the case that straying is established therein.
...
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
Re: Ground of Being
I did when I posted ...gad rgyangs wrote:you keep arguing points that no one here is disagreeing with. why not address the original point:
my contention is that all phenomena of samsara and nirvana, including ignorance, are the display of the basis. If you agree with this, there is no dispute. If you don't agree with this, please explain how ignorance is not included in "all phenomena of samsara and nirvana"
My 2 cents:
Ignorance is not a phenomenon.
It is an absence of a phenomenon.
And that phenomenon is recognition of one's true state.
... and subsequent variation of the same point, such as
The natural state is the natural state regardless of recognition or non-recognition.
When there is recognition of the natural state, then there is the state of buddhahood.
When there is an absence of the recognition of the natural state, then there is the state of sentient being.
.... but apparently you seemed unable to see it.
One last try:
Using light as an analogy, recognition is light, non-recognition/ignorance is the mere absence of light. In the same way as there is no actual phenomenon of darkness, there is no actual phenomenon of ignorance/non-recognition. When appearances arise, the absence of the phenomenon of recognition allows phenomena of mistaken recognitions to arise such as the duality of self and other. If the phenomenon of recognition arises, then mistaken recognitions cannot arise. I hope that is clear enough.
- gad rgyangs
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm
Re: Ground of Being
look around you.Sherab wrote: Ignorance is not a phenomenon.
what do you think "phenomena of mistaken recognition" are? Ans: "ignorance"the absence of the phenomenon of recognition allows phenomena of mistaken recognitions to arise
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
Re: Ground of Being
But there is no real single phenomenon call ignorance whereas there is that real single phenomenon of recognition. Mistaken recognitions are NOT ignorance, but they can arise because of the space presented by the absence of the phenomenon of recognition. When the phenomenon of recognition is present, there is no space for the arsing of mistaken recognitions.gad rgyangs wrote:look around you.Sherab wrote: Ignorance is not a phenomenon.
what do you think "phenomena of mistaken recognition" are? Ans: "ignorance"the absence of the phenomenon of recognition allows phenomena of mistaken recognitions to arise
In other words, the absence of the phenomenon of recognition allows the arising of mistaken recognitions. It is not the presence of the phenomenon of ignorance that allows the arising of mistaken recognitions.
Btw, why did you enclose the word ignorance in quotes?
- gad rgyangs
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:53 pm
Re: Ground of Being
"ignorance" i take to be the entire process from non-recognition (straying, 'khrul pa) to all the phenomena of samsara. read all about it in chapter 2 of the tshig don mdzod. if you are instead translating some particular Dzogchen term as "ignorance", let me know.Sherab wrote:But there is no real single phenomenon call ignorance whereas there is that real single phenomenon of recognition. Mistaken recognitions are NOT ignorance, but they can arise because of the space presented by the absence of the phenomenon of recognition. When the phenomenon of recognition is present, there is no space for the arsing of mistaken recognitions.gad rgyangs wrote:look around you.Sherab wrote: Ignorance is not a phenomenon.
what do you think "phenomena of mistaken recognition" are? Ans: "ignorance"the absence of the phenomenon of recognition allows phenomena of mistaken recognitions to arise
In other words, the absence of the phenomenon of recognition allows the arising of mistaken recognitions. It is not the presence of the phenomenon of ignorance that allows the arising of mistaken recognitions.
Btw, why did you enclose the word ignorance in quotes?
Thoroughly tame your own mind.
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
This is (possibly) the teaching of Buddha.
"I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind."
- Descartes, 2nd Meditation 25
Re: Ground of Being
I take marigpa (absence of knowledge, knowledge that is due to recognition) to be ignorance. Therefore in a real sense, there is no phenomenon of ignorance since ignorance is referring to a mere absence of knowledge/recognition, whereas that knowledge/recognition is a phenomenon in its own right.gad rgyangs wrote:"ignorance" i take to be the entire process from non-recognition (straying, 'khrul pa) to all the phenomena of samsara. read all about it in chapter 2 of the tshig don mdzod. if you are instead translating some particular Dzogchen term as "ignorance", let me know.
Looks like there can be no agreement between us so I am going to let it rest.
Re: Ground of Being
The basis is a convention isn't it? It's only the basis from the perspective of non-recognition, because the "basis" is in fact is self-originated wisdom(emptiness). It's not as if there's some inherently existing ground or source called the basis. So ignorance comes prior to the basis because the basis (acting as a basis of "something else") is a result of imputed ignorance. If recognition that display is "self-originated wisdom's" own-display as self originated wisdom in-and-of-itself, the basis is no longer the basis but wisdom.
That's my stab at it... That being said isn't all of this basis talk irrelevant unless one is involved in certain practices? Mainly thogal? Seems like it's really attempting to capture something that linear thought and language can't properly represent except for a basic outline for those about to do said practices.
That's my stab at it... That being said isn't all of this basis talk irrelevant unless one is involved in certain practices? Mainly thogal? Seems like it's really attempting to capture something that linear thought and language can't properly represent except for a basic outline for those about to do said practices.