catmoon wrote:Interesting site. Are there published papers?
catmoon wrote:Wow. That is a well respected journal, quoting well known pioneers in the field, the math is correct as far as I can remember, and the rest looks right. What the author is doing is pointing out the pitfalls of believing field lines are real objects, instead of following the math which describes only a vector field. The arguments are cogent and convincing.
Thanks much Will, I really enjoyed reading that.
Will wrote:Thank you Catmoon; but I do lament dropping into college so briefly
Are there really distinct electric versus magnetic fields? Unless you mean the natural lodestone field versus one induced by a current?
Norwegian wrote:Short Wiki introduction to Plasma Cosmology: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology
And then there's this interesting blog entry (with comments):
"How I know Plasma Cosmology is wrong":
http://scientopia.org/blogs/galacticint ... -is-wrong/
As far as I can tell, the plasma cosmology people are basing all of their objections on a (probably unconscious) desire to be the Justified Iconoclast, latching on with their friends to a Truth that the mainstream refuses to see.
Son wrote:I'm so glad they're finally catching on to this.
Will wrote:Do gravity, Relativity and empty space provide a true picture of cosmology?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests