Nangwa wrote:gnyis snang ‘khrul b’i sems chan
gad rgyangs wrote:Nangwa wrote:gnyis snang ‘khrul b’i sems chan
if its this, a bit mis-spelled:
"gnyis snang 'khrul ba'i sems can"
it could mean something like "sentient beings of confused dualistic appearances".
if its from a mind-only text it would be referring to the dualistic appearance of mind appearing as both subject and object.
need more context. need Lopon.
(BTW "chan" is soupy cooked grain like congee.)
Users browsing this forum: bryandavis and 3 guests