Uncontrived

Beatzen
Posts: 206
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Uncontrived

Post by Beatzen »

A misconception about zazen is that zazen is meditation. In meditation, such as in the theravadin and Tibetan tradition, one contemplates shapes, and visualizations ect.

But in zazen, we aren't doing such things. Steadying the mind on the breath in the tanden region, we empty our mind of it's contents and relax into glimpsing our original face.

Now that sounds like a far cry from all these fantastical meditative techniques marketed by other traditions. Surely zazen is the most expedient path to self realization.
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Malcolm »

Beatzen wrote: But in zazen, we aren't doing such things. Steadying the mind on the breath in the tanden region, we empty our mind of it's contents and relax into glimpsing our original face.
That is a pretty contrived meditation, from this Tibetan Buddhist's POV.
User avatar
DarwidHalim
Posts: 418
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:04 pm

Re: Uncontrived

Post by DarwidHalim »

Beatzen wrote: ....we empty our mind of it's contents ....
Please never ever do this kind of meditation. Besides this is not zazen, this meditation is dangerous.
I am not here nor there.
I am not right nor wrong.
I do not exist neither non-exist.
I am not I nor non-I.
I am not in samsara nor nirvana.
To All Buddhas, I bow down for the teaching of emptiness. Thank You!
User avatar
ground
Posts: 1782
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am

Re: Uncontrived

Post by ground »

Beatzen wrote:... we empty our mind of it's contents ...
Who empties? And who has "mind"? Did you ever find "mind"? There is no-thing.
Beatzen wrote: and relax into glimpsing our original face.
Fantasy. Contrivance.
If mind is not produced, what need is there for cross-legged sitting dhyana?

The Bodhidharma Anthology
User avatar
Quiet Heart
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 10:57 am
Location: Bangkok Thailand

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Quiet Heart »

:shrug:
I do not choose to do zazen as my "practice".
Here's my personal view.
If a tock a rock...lets say it weighed 10kg, and placed it on a mat....it's "mind" would be totally empty.
All right, it doesn't have a "mind" then, it's just a dumb rock.
But it's "nature" is totally empty.
So how long, just sitting there with an empty "nature" would it take that rock before it became a 10kg Buddha?
Obviously, it wouldn't.
Now, we have a sentient being, a human. This human sentient being sits on a mat in zazen and counts his or her breaths.
After some time there "mind" is totally "empty".
My question is, if that sentient human being keeps sitting on that mat with a totally empty "mind", how is that sentient being any different from that rock?
And if that rock doesn't become a Buddha, then why would that sentient human being ever become a Buddha either?
O.K. I understand why a beginner, perhaps unable to concentrate and with a mind racing about wildly, might be taught to do zazen to develop stillness and relax their mind. I can even acknowledge the value of a period of zazen for a more advanced practitioner to calm and quiet his or her mind in order to go on to other practices after he or she got into that calm an peaceful stillness state.
So my real question to those who do zazen repeatedly or every day is: so o.k., now you and the rock are the same.
But YOU are a sentient being, not a rock, So, for you, What is Next?
Zazen has it's purposes, but there is a time to go on to the next step. That's really all I am saying.
Once again, this is only my personal opinion, and others may disagree (and very likely will).

Which leads me to this poem I herad somewhere:

A monk sits in meditation on a mat, and will not lie down.
Or a corpse lies on the floor and can not sit up.
Tell me then, why are these both not mindless corpses?
:smile:
Shame on you Shakyamuni for setting the precedent of leaving home.
Did you think it was not there--
in your wife's lovely face
in your baby's laughter?
Did you think you had to go elsewhere (simply) to find it?
from - Judyth Collin
The Layman's Lament
From What Book, 1998, p. 52
Edited by Gary Gach
User avatar
ground
Posts: 1782
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am

Re: Uncontrived

Post by ground »

Quiet Heart wrote:But YOU are a sentient being, not a rock, So, for you, What is Next?
Well you won't ask this while sitting zazen and in a short aftermath while still being enough conditioned by it. So you just must not stop sitting zazen :smile:

Quiet Heart wrote: A monk sits in meditation on a mat, and will not lie down.
Or a corpse lies on the floor and can not sit up.
Tell me then, why are these both not mindless corpses?
:smile:
Both are mindless corpses but ...
There is only this non-emptiness: that connected with the six sensory spheres, dependent on this very body with life as its condition.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But hey. Zazen may be a good tool to re-establish mindfulness when you have lost it and cannot re-establish it in another way.

But beware
'Whatever is fabricated & mentally fashioned is inconstant & subject to cessation.'
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Beatzen
Posts: 206
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Beatzen »

The avatamsaka sutra instructs to empty the mind of discursive thought. How is this dangerous. Do you even practice zazen?
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji
Beatzen
Posts: 206
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:18 am
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Beatzen »

TMingyur wrote:
Beatzen wrote:... we empty our mind of it's contents ...
Who empties? And who has "mind"? Did you ever find "mind"? There is no-thing.
Beatzen wrote: and relax into glimpsing our original face.
Fantasy. Contrivance.
If mind is not produced, what need is there for cross-legged sitting dhyana?

The Bodhidharma Anthology
I don't think it's fantasy. I think your mind is inhibited by the five hinderances, particularly of doubt.

I think it's ironic that ritualists like Tibetan buddhists criticize anything about zazen as contrived.

There might not be a self who empties, but we can be aware of an emptying. Read tenzin palmo on the nature of mind.
"Cause is not before and Effect is not after"
- Eihei Dogen Zenji
User avatar
ground
Posts: 1782
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am

Re: Uncontrived

Post by ground »

Beatzen wrote: I don't think it's fantasy. I think your mind is inhibited by the five hinderances, particularly of doubt.

I think it's ironic that ritualists like Tibetan buddhists criticize anything about zazen as contrived.

There might not be a self who empties, but we can be aware of an emptying. Read tenzin palmo on the nature of mind.
"your mind", "my mind" ..."you", "I" ... "you", "mine" "yours"

No practice - Great Doubt!
User avatar
DarwidHalim
Posts: 418
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:04 pm

Re: Uncontrived

Post by DarwidHalim »

Beatzen wrote:The avatamsaka sutra instructs to empty the mind of discursive thought. How is this dangerous. Do you even practice zazen?
How do you empty the mind of discursive thought?

If thought appears, what do you do?
I am not here nor there.
I am not right nor wrong.
I do not exist neither non-exist.
I am not I nor non-I.
I am not in samsara nor nirvana.
To All Buddhas, I bow down for the teaching of emptiness. Thank You!
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8881
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Astus »

Beatzen wrote:But in zazen, we aren't doing such things. Steadying the mind on the breath in the tanden region, we empty our mind of it's contents and relax into glimpsing our original face.
Where is this kind of seated meditation from? What text, which teacher?
Sitting down, focusing on breath, in the tanden region, emptying the mind of its contents, relaxing, glimpsing the original face.

Well, that's quite a complicated and restrictive practice with several steps to go through, not to mention understanding many foreign and obscure concepts. No doubt this is a possible form of seated meditation, but it's hardly uncontrived or unique/universal in Zen.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
User avatar
Seishin
Former staff member
Posts: 1915
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:53 am
Contact:

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Seishin »

I think "zazen" is a word that has different meanings in the different Japanese schools.

EDIT: Let me restate that; it's two words za (坐) "to sit" http://www.saiga-jp.com/cgi-bin/dic.cgi ... 3973_68085" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and zen (禅) "to meditate" http://www.saiga-jp.com/cgi-bin/dic.cgi ... 3973_68085" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (though here they've shown the meaning as "zen (buddhism)"!)
Last edited by Seishin on Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mindyourmind
Posts: 497
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:11 am
Location: South Africa

Re: Uncontrived

Post by mindyourmind »

Beatzen wrote:A misconception about zazen is that zazen is meditation. In meditation, such as in the theravadin and Tibetan tradition, one contemplates shapes, and visualizations ect.

But in zazen, we aren't doing such things. Steadying the mind on the breath in the tanden region, we empty our mind of it's contents and relax into glimpsing our original face.

Now that sounds like a far cry from all these fantastical meditative techniques marketed by other traditions. Surely zazen is the most expedient path to self realization.

Your question presupposes that your definition of zazen is more beneficial in the process of enlightenment than your definition of Theravadin and Tibetan meditation.

Before we get to any attempts at answers, why do you make such presupposition? We cannot start there, even on your own definitions and understanding.
Dualism is the real root of our suffering and all of our conflicts.

Namkhai Norbu
muni
Posts: 5559
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: Uncontrived

Post by muni »

Uncontrived: not by design or artifice; unforced and impromptu....unstudied spontaneous.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hhFiSrs ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Surrender. Embrace emptiness and the whole universe is yours".
User avatar
mañjughoṣamaṇi
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:26 pm
Location: ཟི་ལིང་། མཚོ་སྔོན་ཞིང་ཆེན།
Contact:

Re: Uncontrived

Post by mañjughoṣamaṇi »

Zen is less ritualized than Tibetan traditions? I don't think this is at all true "on the ground". Maybe in some US and European nouveau-Zen centers, but certainly not in Japan.
སེམས་རྣམ་པར་གྲོལ་བར་བྱའི་ཕྱིར་བྱམས་པ་བསྒོམ་པར་བྱའོ།
“In order to completely liberate the mind, cultivate loving kindness.” -- Maitribhāvana Sūtra

"The bottom always falls out of the quest for the elementary. The irreducibly individual recedes like the horizon, as our analysis advances." -- Genesis, Michel Serres
Malcolm
Posts: 42974
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Malcolm »

Beatzen wrote: I think it's ironic that ritualists like Tibetan buddhists criticize anything about zazen as contrived.
If you think you can sum Tibetan Buddhism up as ritualist, it means you have not understood anything at all about Tibetan Buddhism.

N
muni
Posts: 5559
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: Uncontrived

Post by muni »

Like views of boxes wrapped in paper, the papers with many colors can for example looking childish, others with black and gold can look of great or right value while inside all boxes is locked air.

Tricky mind views my dear.
User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: Uncontrived

Post by catmoon »

Us ritualists are a varied lot. In my case, Buddhism began with contact with Zen, and a complete misunderstanding of it. This led to some reading and meditation and wound up in the Gelug tradition. Not all Gelugs are completely comfortable with the ritualistic side of things. I just do a little, based on the idea that well, if it worked that well for the Dalai Lama, and so many other lamas, there must be something at the core of these practices, something effective. And there does in fact seem to be more going on in the rituals than mere repetitious behaviour.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.
User avatar
Astus
Former staff member
Posts: 8881
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Astus »

In many Zen centres they carefully explain to you how to sit, how to walk, how to eat, how to bow, etc. And when it comes to what to do actually when you're supposed to meditate, that is, what to do with the mind, they can only say a few words like "just let it go", "only don't know", and such. I call this super-ritualistic and quite uninformative.
1 Myriad dharmas are only mind.
Mind is unobtainable.
What is there to seek?

2 If the Buddha-Nature is seen,
there will be no seeing of a nature in any thing.

3 Neither cultivation nor seated meditation —
this is the pure Chan of Tathagata.

4 With sudden enlightenment to Tathagata Chan,
the six paramitas and myriad means
are complete within that essence.


1 Huangbo, T2012Ap381c1 2 Nirvana Sutra, T374p521b3; tr. Yamamoto 3 Mazu, X1321p3b23; tr. J. Jia 4 Yongjia, T2014p395c14; tr. from "The Sword of Wisdom"
User avatar
Josef
Posts: 2611
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm

Re: Uncontrived

Post by Josef »

This thread is contrived.
"All phenomena of samsara depend on the mind, so when the essence of mind is purified, samsara is purified. Since the phenomena of nirvana depend on the pristine consciousness of vidyā, because one remains in the immediacy of vidyā, buddhahood arises on its own. All critical points are summarized with those two." - Longchenpa
Post Reply

Return to “Zen”