Plasma Cosmology

Casual conversation between friends. Anything goes (almost).
User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:58 pm

Do gravity, Relativity and empty space provide a true picture of cosmology? Most cosmologists think so; but there are other views. One is the Plasma Universe notion:

http://www.plasmacosmology.net/
A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby catmoon » Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:54 pm

Interesting site. Are there published papers?
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:39 pm

A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby catmoon » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:15 am

Wow. That is a well respected journal, quoting well known pioneers in the field, the math is correct as far as I can remember, and the rest looks right. What the author is doing is pointing out the pitfalls of believing field lines are real objects, instead of following the math which describes only a vector field. The arguments are cogent and convincing.

Thanks much Will, I really enjoyed reading that.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:56 am

A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby catmoon » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:19 pm

Well, they are different models of electric fields, and students are usually taught to use them both freely.

A vector field is a field of values assigned to a space. Each point in the space has a vector associated with it that describes the field at that point. A vector is a just a numerical value with a direction, and is usually represented by an arrow whose length represents the numerical part. So if you know the equation of an electric field, you know the value and direction of the field at each point, because you can calculate all the vectors.

Field lines are different because in that representation, the lines are discrete objects while a vector field is continuous. Further, field lines may give a nice sense of the shape of a field, but the are prone to certain misinterpretations. The guy in the paper points out that fields cannot explosively reconnect as is thought to happen in solar flares - the lines just don't exist in that way. They hardly exist at all, really. People do most calculations using the vector model and mostly use field lines as a visualization aid.

Another prob pops up when perfectly reasonable vector fields are modelled as field lines. Sometimes the vector model leads to open - ended field lines, which are not supposed to exist. However, such vector models lead to perfectly good explanations of observed reality when models are run on computers. So it looks like the vector model is the gold standard.

Besides all of which, there are no field lines, one should really speak of field surfaces. Oh and this all applies to magnetic fields as well, with perhaps a few oddities arising from the lack of magnetic monopoles.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.

User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby catmoon » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:35 pm

The idea of field lines arose from the old experiment where you put a magnet on a table, place a sheet of paper over the magnet and then sprinkle iron filings on it. This dramatic demonstration gave every body the idea that the lines are something real. But the exact location of the lines depends entirely on things like the composition of the filings, their size and how much you shake the paper.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:14 pm

Thank you Catmoon; but I do lament dropping into college so briefly :crying:

Are there really distinct electric versus magnetic fields? Unless you mean the natural lodestone field versus one induced by a current?
A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:42 pm

Forgot to mention this discussion forum site: http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/index.php
A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby catmoon » Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:18 am

Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:58 pm

You Tube has a good introduction to the subject; an interview with Thornhill on the topic of: Debunking Misconceptions About the Electric Universe - PART ONE
A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:49 pm

Am now reading Donald Scott's book The Electric Sky, which outlines some basics of our plasma universe; a very different view from standard model astronomy.

This link has a sample chapter, Table of Contents etc.

http://www.electric-cosmos.org/
A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

Norwegian
Posts: 936
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:36 pm

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Norwegian » Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:09 pm

Short Wiki introduction to Plasma Cosmology: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology

And then there's this interesting blog entry (with comments):

"How I know Plasma Cosmology is wrong":
http://scientopia.org/blogs/galacticint ... -is-wrong/

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:05 pm

A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby catmoon » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:10 am

Well we don't know if there is some hidden agenda here, if there is someone advancing some mystic revelation in the guise of science, but it really doesn't look like it. One does not just walk into an IEEE journal and post there.

What I see, is someone questioning the existing paradigm in a legitimate way. Cosmology to date has been largely concerned with gravity and the mass of the universe, and has more or less assumed that electromagnetic effects cancel out on the large scale. There is also a tendency to draw pretty dubious conclusions from the field line model, which is a pretty rough and ready rule of thumb rather than a rigorously developed theory.

Now, if he is right, this is going to invalidate the work of a number of people, and they are going to get very upset about that, and I think we can see that happening. It's getting very interesting.

For instance what if the dark energy everyone is so worried about turns out be a large scale electromagnetic effect? What if the universe at large is not electrically homogenous, what if there are large currents circulating in it? And how could they affect visible matter? There is certainly a lot of plasma in the universe (most of it actually) and that stuff is reactive to electric and magnetic fields.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:01 pm

Hannes Alfven is, perhaps, the major scientist of recent times to foster Plasma cosmology. In 1970 he was awarded the Nobel Prize. His bibliography is (even online) extensive:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n
A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
Son
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Son » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:07 pm

I'm so glad they're finally catching on to this.

User avatar
Nicholas Weeks
Posts: 2820
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:21 am
Location: California

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Nicholas Weeks » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:16 pm

A bodhisattva does not become weary of evil beings nor does he commit the error of bringing forth thoughts inclined to reject them and cast them aside. Avatamsaka Sutra, ch. 25

User avatar
Son
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Son » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:21 pm

Scientists went from thinking the human world was the center of the universe, to the idea that our solar system existed in a vast universe that was contained in a great crystal bubble that kept all the matter inside. After that theory faded, they concluded arbitrarily that the universe begins with a single "bang" in the middle and either expands until it dissipates into nothing, or it contracts again only to bang once more.

It's encouraging and hopeful that something else, something based on plasma is being taken seriously in their community. Indeed, what if a universal cluster begins and ends with a single plasma body? Like a glob of plasma that further transmutes into new, birthing universes. As Buddhists, we are aware of the fact that the entire cosmos does not fully dissipate nor generate itself in an intrinsically empty vacuum. It is beginningless and endless.



User avatar
Son
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Plasma Cosmology

Postby Son » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:33 pm



Return to “Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests