Please forgive if this has already been beaten to death on these boards, but I feel the need to inquire:
1. As I understand it, many modern neuroscientists say that the soul or self is an illusion or delusion based on misinterpretation of brain activity. Some popularizers use this idea to say, "See? Neuroscience confirms Buddhist anatta/anatman".
Somehow, I do not think that this is an accurate statement. If I understand correctly, the Buddha taught that the human being is composed of temporary processes that the Buddha compared to mere "heaps" - "heaps of skandhas". There are mental as well as physical skandhas.
If this is correct, then are not those neurologists who make the claim mistaken? Mistaken in that if the soul/self/mind is delusional, then from the Buddhist point of view, so to are the brain/neural network delusional ... for the simple reason that heaps of skandhas are mental as well as physical/bodily? If that's true, then the body-brain ought logically be seen to be just as illusory as the mind/self.
Can anyone please respond to this issue?
AND...
2. Is there anything in the Buddhist teachings/traditions about how neuropathology impacts the mind - the mind viewed as "that which meditates"?
Not long ago I watched a YouTube lecture in which the lecturer said that Buddhist monasteries just don't possess a suffiicent "mental mapping" of brain pathology in regards to Buddhist monks. Naturally, the speaker's main subject was Alzheimer's disease. He maintained that there is virtually nothing in the traditions/monastic orders or in the Dharma itself that deals with the mental effects of brain disease/brain injury.
I therefore wonder just what modern, scientifically informed Buddhists are currently thinking about this issue. It is as if the basic Buddhistic (as well as other religious groups) stance always begins with the assumption of a sound mind in the practitioner. That is, the mind may be "sick" (Buddhism: egoic, enslaved by attachment/Christianity: sin/estrangement from God-and-Grace) in a spiritual sense, but sound and capable in terms of what most cultures regard as a normal, sane mind. I am not aware of any religious system that begins from a standpoint of a pathological mentality in the practitioner.
So I am wondering: What does Buddhism - modern, scientifically informed Buddhism - have to say about neuropathologies and injuries/traumas that occur during a practitioner's meditative initiation, or long after many years of practice? In short, how does Buddhism and/or the Dharma handle a practitioner's sick, injured mind, when the sickness and injury are clearly due to brain problems? Can the journey toward Buddhahood be interrupted or even derailed by a physical "skandha" such as brain sickness or injury?
There is a line in the novel, Midnight Cowboy, "There ain't no Beatitude for the lonely". Is there in Buddhism a Beatitude or practice for the brain injured and Alzheimer's victims? Can a mind "parallel-injured" by brain failure perform the requisit meditations?

