Date problems

Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators

Date problems

Postby Daniel Arraes » Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:24 pm

How come some sources state Kamalashila lived between 713 and 763 c.e., whereas the Samye debate took place supposedly arround 794 c.e?
Is there any hypothesis like there being two kamalashilas?
Daniel Arraes
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 6:57 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: Date problems

Postby Pero » Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:25 pm

Well this topic isn't about what I thought it would be. :rolling:
Although many individuals in this age appear to be merely indulging their worldly desires, one does not have the capacity to judge them, so it is best to train in pure vision.
- Shabkar
Pero
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:54 pm

Re: Date problems

Postby Malcolm » Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:32 pm

Daniel Arraes wrote:How come some sources state Kamalashila lived between 713 and 763 c.e., whereas the Samye debate took place supposedly arround 794 c.e?
Is there any hypothesis like there being two kamalashilas?



Tibetans were very fuzzy about dates, and imperial dates used to be considered 60 years earlier than we think of them now.
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://atikosha.org
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

" The one who teaches the benefits of peace,
he is said to be a ṛṣī; the others are the opposite of him."

-- Uttaratantra
Malcolm
 
Posts: 10165
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am

Re: Date problems

Postby catmoon » Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:37 am

Pero wrote:Well this topic isn't about what I thought it would be. :rolling:


Likewise I'm sure!
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.
User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia


Return to Nyingma

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Karma Jinpa, philji and 12 guests

>