Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
Sergei wrote:Can anyone explain this deity to me? (I post the question here, because I understand that he is primarily a Kagyu deity, but I may well be mistaken in this.) For example, there seem to be two tantric versions of Chenrezig--him and Hayagriva. Do they have different meanings? Why does Kagyu (or perhaps just Karma Kagyu) emphasize this deity? What about him makes him higher than white Chenrezig? (Surely more than just color.)
Also, I have seen very different-looking pictures of Red Avalokiteshvara. In one, he looks just like four-armed Chenrezig, except colored red. In another he has only two arms, and is in union with a consort who may or may not be Vajrayogini. I think there are others as well. How did this iconography develop, historically?
Thank you!
Silent Bob wrote:First he was asked by Marpa to go to India and receive these teachings on the nine dharmas of the formless dakinis from Tiphupa.
Namdrol wrote:Silent Bob wrote:First he was asked by Marpa to go to India and receive these teachings on the nine dharmas of the formless dakinis from Tiphupa.
This part of Gampo abbey's thing is wrong. Mila asked Rechungpa to go, not marpa. Rechungpa never met Marpa.
Silent Bob wrote:Namdrol wrote:Silent Bob wrote:First he was asked by Marpa to go to India and receive these teachings on the nine dharmas of the formless dakinis from Tiphupa.
This part of Gampo abbey's thing is wrong. Mila asked Rechungpa to go, not marpa. Rechungpa never met Marpa.
You're right--that part doesn't make sense. Please try to forgive me.
Silent Bob wrote:Not to be outdone by my friend Cone, I offer this quote from "The Autobiography of Jamgon Kongtrul": "This practice of Jinasagara, being the quintessential life force of the dakinis, is traditionally said to be very hazardous, and so there are many stories of others, too, who have encountered dangers with this practice. For me, though, I just have never experienced a personal retreat more upsetting than this one." (p.67)

Karma Sherab wrote:Here is a point to "bake one's noodle" (excuse the plagiarized quote please).
...the first Karma Chagme; is said to be father Tantra.
Thrangu Rinpoche is adamant on this on the basis that the "tradition" is father Tantra.
...
Jamgon Kongtrul also lists the Tantra as mother Tantra (please see the back matter in “the Gem of many colours”). The Drubthab kundu lists it among mother Tantras.
I have discussed this in depth with the late Bokar Rinpoche who looked it up in his personal note books and also verified that when he received the lineage, it was stated to be mother tantra.
Now to add further fuel to this pointless fire, Beru Khyentse Rinpoche and Khenpo Karthar Rinpoche have said that Jinasagara is non-dual tantra like Kalachakra.
Bokar Rinpoche did say that over time as various oral instructions evolved the practice could have become defacto non-dual tantra. Thrangu Rinpoche did not want to refute this view and agreed in theory but otherwise, as is evident in the Gampo abbey site, sticks to his view that Jinasagara is a father Tantra.

conebeckham wrote: they came down to the Kamtsang via the first Situpa. This was passed down the lineage, and Karma Pakshi later also received transmission of certain elements
sherabpa wrote:conebeckham wrote: they came down to the Kamtsang via the first Situpa. This was passed down the lineage, and Karma Pakshi later also received transmission of certain elements
Karma Pakshi [1203–1283] surely pre-dates the first Situ [1377-1448]?

Karma Sherab wrote:Here is a point to "bake one's noodle" (excuse the plagiarized quote please).
The Gampo Abbey account says that "Lokeshvara Mahakarunikaya Jinasagara Avalokitesvara" ( Tib: Jigtenwangchuk Tug je chenpo Gyalwa Gyatso Chenrezi) - to refer to Him with the full name used in the Mandala Ritual Sadhana and the Great Commentary by the first Karma Chagme; is said to be father Tantra.
Users browsing this forum: anjali, Google [Bot], zerwe and 4 guests