
SteveP wrote:Hello everyone,
I am new here, and new to buddhism also. I have been ill recently, depression anxiety etc. I do beleive that much of my illness has been due to delusions. I endevour to eliminate these delusions, not only so that I can be a healthier, happier man, but so that I can be of more use to other people.
My knowlege of Buddhism is limited, and so I am here to learn.
At the moment I have one question concerning attachment. Although I can see that attachment can lead to suffering and non virtuous actions, how can I avoid attachment with other people? In a sense, should I apply equal attachment to all people, without favourites? If so, how do I acheive this?
X
sangyey wrote:Usually eliminating attachment to loved one's , freinds, etc., is a teaching found in the four immeasurables - love, compassion, joy, and equanimity, namely equinimity in this case where you try to develop an even-minded attitude towards loved one's, enemies, and neutral persons so as to form a basis for developing unbiased love and compassion towards all beings.

SteveP wrote:Hello everyone,
I am new here, and new to buddhism also. I have been ill recently, depression anxiety etc. I do beleive that much of my illness has been due to delusions. I endevour to eliminate these delusions, not only so that I can be a healthier, happier man, but so that I can be of more use to other people.
My knowlege of Buddhism is limited, and so I am here to learn.
At the moment I have one question concerning attachment. Although I can see that attachment can lead to suffering and non virtuous actions, how can I avoid attachment with other people? In a sense, should I apply equal attachment to all people, without favourites? If so, how do I acheive this?
X
SteveP wrote:Hello everyone,
I am new here, and new to buddhism also. I have been ill recently, depression anxiety etc. I do beleive that much of my illness has been due to delusions. I endevour to eliminate these delusions, not only so that I can be a healthier, happier man, but so that I can be of more use to other people.
My knowlege of Buddhism is limited, and so I am here to learn.
At the moment I have one question concerning attachment. Although I can see that attachment can lead to suffering and non virtuous actions, how can I avoid attachment with other people? In a sense, should I apply equal attachment to all people, without favourites? If so, how do I acheive this?
X
SteveP wrote:Thank you.
I interpret that as I need to use this pain to realise the nature of attachment as being bad, so that I can then work upon eliminating non-virtous attachment. Is this what you mean?
SteveP wrote:...
The hardest part for me, is that I have a strong attachment to one person, I am unsure of the nature of this attachment, and it might be posessive desire, although this is combined with real feelings of love. For me, this is hard to over come.
mint wrote:SteveP wrote:Thank you.
I interpret that as I need to use this pain to realise the nature of attachment as being bad, so that I can then work upon eliminating non-virtous attachment. Is this what you mean?
You must work on getting it out of your mind that attachment is "bad." This only reinforces the dualistic mind, and since attachment and pain are a part of you then this would be cheating yourself. This does not mean that you go on collecting more and more attachment because this would be unwise and would miss the point. Regarding attachment as "bad" is like knocking out one thing but then having another spring up in its place which gets you nowhere at all. You cannot cultivate what you cannot accept. Bodhisattvas cannot work with fantasy or denial. When you examine the pain and attachment for what they are with all their associations, you gain a more thorough understanding of what you are. Only then can afflictive attachment be transformed.
I recommend reading Chogyam Trungpa's short book Meditation in Action.
I can see that there will be no quick transformations, and that need to train for a long time. This is fine with me, because this is way of life and not a tablet.SteveP wrote: Its easier said than doneI can see that there will be no quick transformations, and that need to train for a long time. This is fine with me, because this is way of life and not a tablet.
Users browsing this forum: jeeprs, Seishin, Simon E. and 8 guests