meiji1 wrote:I think my understanding is off. What does 'signlessness' refer to? The best I can guess is 'empty of appearance' but shouldn't that just fall under emptiness?
Huifeng wrote:These are a couple of, but not all of, the interpretations of the signless.
kirtu wrote:Huifeng wrote:These are a couple of, but not all of, the interpretations of the signless.
Aemilius wrote:I understand intentionlessness to be a state of the subject, primarily. Of the early sutras for ex An 11.17, Dasama sutta, is an interesting Mahamudra -type of discourse, it says that dhyanas are willed and fabricated, which sounds like a normal mahamudra discourse, one should get beyond them to a state that is unfabricated, unwilled, !
Aemilius wrote:Shunyata; emptiness
Users browsing this forum: antiquebuddhas and 12 guests