Your above post is just unfounded papanca (edit: well actually two posts above, since you've posted again) - another grandiose set of putthujana "what ifs" and conjecture, not rooted in the Buddha's teaching.
You're welcome to believe your own reasoning of course, no one here will deny you that right, but if you're going to say "According to Theravada..." and expect anyone here to take you seriously, when you offer nothing but unfounded papanca, you should not be overly surprised when they don't. Mahayanists have a long history of trying to tell Theravada what it is.
"Do not force others, including children, by any means whatsoever, to adopt your views, whether by authority, threat, money, propaganda, or even education." - Ven. Thich Nhat Hanh
"The uprooting of identity is seen by the noble ones as pleasurable; but this contradicts what the whole world sees." (Snp 3.12)
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead" - Thomas Paine