Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:36 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
Serenity509 wrote:
As a Westerner, I have trouble believing in any concept of the afterlife without sufficient evidence. The most I can say is that good is somehow rewarded and evil is somehow punished.


There has been research into thousands of cases where children claimed to remember things from before their conception. More often than not it corresponds to actual events, people, places and so on from before they were born.

Check out the University of Virginia's Division of Perceptual Studies:

http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinic ... -page#CORT

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 128
Location: United States
Huseng wrote:
Serenity509 wrote:
As a Westerner, I have trouble believing in any concept of the afterlife without sufficient evidence. The most I can say is that good is somehow rewarded and evil is somehow punished.


There has been research into thousands of cases where children claimed to remember things from before their conception. More often than not it corresponds to actual events, people, places and so on from before they were born.

Check out the University of Virginia's Division of Perceptual Studies:

http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinic ... -page#CORT


Is it more likely that they are recalling past lives or that they tapped into someone else's memories from the collective consciousness?

How can one recall the memories of past lives if there is no enduring self?


Last edited by Serenity509 on Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 128
Location: United States
Namdrol wrote:
Serenity509 wrote:
I think this is relevant to almost any discussion we have:



Buddhism is not a "invent it was we go along" type of religion.

Also, insisting on the vital role rebirth plays in Buddha's teaching is not the same thing as speculatively insisting that one's own views are correct where everyone else's are wrong.

N


Did Buddha say think and discover for yourself or accept his teaching based on hearsay?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:19 pm
Posts: 364
Namdrol wrote:
PadmaVonSamba wrote:

One does not have to believe in rebirth in order to follow the teachings of the dharma.



There is no point in following Buddhadharma if you do not accept rebirth.

N



Yes but according to every level of buddhism, you need to have something called the divya caksus to have PERSONAL EXPERIENCE with rebirth.

_________________
There is an ever-present freedom from grasping the mind.

Mind being defined as the thing always on the Three Times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
Serenity509 wrote:
Is it more likely that they are recalling past lives or that they tapped into someone else's memories from the collective consciousness?



If that were so, why just recollect one individual's memories and not many?

It is easier to simply conclude that the children remember things from a past life. That's what the scholars like Stevenson and Tucker have concluded after researching this phenomena. No need to defer to ideas of a "collective consciousness" which sounds like some New Age junk anyway.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
Enochian wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
PadmaVonSamba wrote:

One does not have to believe in rebirth in order to follow the teachings of the dharma.



There is no point in following Buddhadharma if you do not accept rebirth.

N



Yes but according to every level of buddhism, you need to have something called the divya caksus to have PERSONAL EXPERIENCE with rebirth.


Not necessarily. With sufficient mastery of dhyāna one will recollect past lives.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Serenity509 wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
Serenity509 wrote:
I think this is relevant to almost any discussion we have:



Buddhism is not a "invent it was we go along" type of religion.

Also, insisting on the vital role rebirth plays in Buddha's teaching is not the same thing as speculatively insisting that one's own views are correct where everyone else's are wrong.

N


Did Buddha say think and discover for yourself or accept his teaching based on hearsay?


Buddha said that one must hear the teachings, reflect on their meaning, and meditate upon them.

But that does not mean that Buddha did not set out the path and the nature of consciousness, and so on in a very precise and detailed way. He drew the map, it is up to those who wish to follow it.

N

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 128
Location: United States
Huseng wrote:
It is easier to simply conclude that the children remember things from a past life. That's what the scholars like Stevenson and Tucker have concluded after researching this phenomena. No need to defer to ideas of a "collective consciousness" which sounds like some New Age junk anyway.


I think collective consciousness is actually a Hindu idea. The point is that it might be just as likely. How can one recall the memories of past lives if there is no enduring self?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:19 pm
Posts: 364
Huseng wrote:
Enochian wrote:

Yes but according to every level of buddhism, you need to have something called the divya caksus to have PERSONAL EXPERIENCE with rebirth.


Not necessarily. With sufficient mastery of dhyāna one will recollect past lives.



The divya caksus IS used from within dhyāna, the fourth dhyāna to be exact.

My whole point is though is that one cannot have PERSONAL EXPERIENCE with rebirth unless one has these abilities.

_________________
There is an ever-present freedom from grasping the mind.

Mind being defined as the thing always on the Three Times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Serenity509 wrote:
How can one recall the memories of past lives if there is no enduring self?



A given stream of consciousness composed of a unique series of moments which are neither the same as nor different from one another. Therefore, memories, thoughts, and so on can be communicated down this unique mind stream without this mind stream bearing a real intrinsic identity.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 5986
Location: Taiwan
Serenity509 wrote:
Huseng wrote:
It is easier to simply conclude that the children remember things from a past life. That's what the scholars like Stevenson and Tucker have concluded after researching this phenomena. No need to defer to ideas of a "collective consciousness" which sounds like some New Age junk anyway.


I think collective consciousness is actually a Hindu idea. The point is that it might be just as likely. How can one recall the memories of past lives if there is no enduring self?


There is no inherently existent substantial self, but there is a conventionally existent person that is reborn. Continuity without inherent identity.

_________________
Flower Ornament Depository (Blog) Indrajāla's Contemplations (Blog) Exploring Classical Chinese (Blog) Dharma Depository (Site)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Enochian wrote:
Huseng wrote:
Enochian wrote:

Yes but according to every level of buddhism, you need to have something called the divya caksus to have PERSONAL EXPERIENCE with rebirth.


Not necessarily. With sufficient mastery of dhyāna one will recollect past lives.



The divya caksus IS used from within dhyāna, the fourth dhyāna to be exact.

My whole point is though is that one cannot have PERSONAL EXPERIENCE with rebirth unless one has these abilities.


The divine has to do with seeing gods, not recalling past lives.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 128
Location: United States
Huseng wrote:
Serenity509 wrote:
Huseng wrote:
It is easier to simply conclude that the children remember things from a past life. That's what the scholars like Stevenson and Tucker have concluded after researching this phenomena. No need to defer to ideas of a "collective consciousness" which sounds like some New Age junk anyway.


I think collective consciousness is actually a Hindu idea. The point is that it might be just as likely. How can one recall the memories of past lives if there is no enduring self?


There is no inherently existent substantial self, but there is a conventionally existent person that is reborn. Continuity without inherent identity.


How is the person then able to recall a past life?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Serenity509 wrote:

How is the person then able to recall a past life?


Your question implies you believe there must be something real or ultimate to convey memories from instant a to instant b.

I answered your question above.

The serial moments of a mind stream carries past impressions. Under the power of samadhi these impressions will unlock one's pastlife experiences.

If one develops sufficient powers of samadhi, one can also examine other people's minds and see into their past lives as well.

N

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 128
Location: United States
Namdrol wrote:
If one develops sufficient powers of samadhi, one can also examine other people's minds and see into their past lives as well.

N


Like I asked before, how do you know then if you are examining your own past life instead of someone else's?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:17 am 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Only an enlightened being can see the past lives of others, since we are not enlightened...

Serenity509 wrote:
While I do not believe in reincarnation...

And I don't belive in defecation.
:namaste:
PS There is no collective unconscious in Buddhism, the alaya vijnana comes close but once again it is limited to the individual mind stream.
PPS There is no guarantee that all beings will reach enlightenment, if a being does not generate the karmic force necessary to achieve enlightenment then they can easily circle through samsara forever. Every sentient being has the capacity (tathagatagarbha) to realise Buddhahood but without putting into effect the correct causes and conditions this capacity will remain merely a capacity.

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 128
Location: United States
gregkavarnos wrote:
PS There is no collective unconscious in Buddhism, the alaya vijnana comes close but once again it is limited to the individual mind stream.


That doesn't matter. What matters is that it's just as likely as retrieving past life memories.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 128
Location: United States
gregkavarnos wrote:
PPS There is no guarantee that all beings will reach enlightenment, if a being does not generate the karmic force necessary to achieve enlightenment then they can easily circle through samsara forever. Every sentient being has the capacity (tathagatagarbha) to realise Buddhahood but without putting into effect the correct causes and conditions this capacity will remain merely a capacity.


With an infinite amount of time, won't nirvana happen eventually?


Last edited by Serenity509 on Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:35 am 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Serenity509 wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote:
PPS There is no guarantee that all beings will reach enlightenment, if a being does not generate the karmic force necessary to achieve enlightenment then they can easily circle through samsara forever. Every sentient being has the capacity (tathagatagarbha) to realise Buddhahood but without putting into effect the correct causes and conditions this capacity will remain merely a capacity.


With an infinite amount of time, won't nirvana happy eventually?
Only if beings engage in actions that will lead them to a realisation of enlightenment, if they do not, then NO!

Your view of reincarnation and enlightenment reminds me of some Hindu views of an existence that is guided by a capital "G" God, and that all beings have to do is follow Gods grand plan that eventually leads all beings to Nirvana. Doesn't work like that. YOU are responsible for your enlightenment, if you don't work towards it, it ain't gonna happen by chance.
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Posts: 2845
Serenity509 wrote:

How can one recall the memories of past lives if there is no enduring self?


That is like asking, "how can leaves float in a stream when the water won't stay still, but keeps moving?"
The leaves are moving, and changing. The stream is moving and changing.
Every "thing" is moving and changing. In fact, you cannot even stop it for a moment and call anything an "thing".
There is only the continuously transforming present moment.

How can one recall memories?
What do you recall?
Did you see a car yesterday?
If you take it apart, none of its parts contain any "carness".
The car was a projection of your own thoughts.
In other words, you remember the concept of 'car" but not a bunch of mechanical parts.
Did that car thought remain fixed?, or did it come and go...Did it keep moving?
(the thought...not the car!)

If a permanent "soul" or 'self" exists,
then what constitutes, or defines the meaning of "permanent"?
It is not a permanent body. Right?
Then, is it a permanent thought?

Permanent means possessing some attribute or quality which does not change over a given period of time.
Everything which is conditioned changes.
Anything which responds to changing conditions thus also changes, thus it is not permanent.
The reflection in a mirror changes. it is not permanent
but we might say that the mirror is permanent, and so you might ask why can't a soul be like that mirror.
But the mirror is not the reflection. We just lump the two together.
The mirror is glass and silver paint.
Likewise, any things we might say are the "silver paint and glass" of the soul would have to be found.
But I don't think anybody has ever found anything that a soul is made of.
It's not physical,and it's not mental.
So, what is it?

_________________
Profile Picture: "The Foaming Monk"
The Chinese characters are Fo (buddha) and Ming (bright). The image is of a student of Buddhism, who, imagining himself to be a monk, and not understanding the true meaning of the words takes the sound of the words literally. Likewise, People on web forums sometime seem to be foaming at the mouth.
Original painting by P.Volker /used by permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group