Different Amitabha mantras and their differences

Different Amitabha mantras and their differences

Postby himalayanspirit » Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:43 am

I came across different forms of reciting Amitabha's name (not due to linguistic differences but completely different mantras). For example, the sanskrit version found among Tibetans is "Om Amitabha Hrih".

And then there is the famous Nianfo (and Nembutsu) form which is more popular. What are the differences between theses?

Since I am from India and naturally accustomed to the Indian languages I recite the Nianfo in its original form as "Namo Amitabhaya" (instead of the more popular eastern versions like Namo Omitofu and Namu Amida Butsu). Is this method good enough? Are there any other versions of the mantra?
himalayanspirit
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Different Amitabha mantras and their differences

Postby rory » Mon Jul 04, 2011 8:17 am

Himalayanspirit;
you'd have to ask a Tibetan buddhist about the purpose of their mantra. Rebirth mantras exist in Chinese and Japanese buddhism too in Tendai & other sects.
As a Jodo buddhist we call on Amitabha's name as it says to do so in the Pure Land Sutras. Using Sanskrit Namo Amitabhaya is perfectly fine, in fact Chinese temples have tried introducing this to Westerners instead of Omitofo, when I attended a Fo Guang temple the old high ranking Chinese monk led us in this chanting & told us the Brasilian members prefer it. He thought it was great.
I chant Amida, as my teacher was from the Japanese tradition and it's 15 years later:) otherwise I'd be chanting in Sanskrit, it's so beautiful & I understand so much.
Do check out Imee Ooi's Pure Land Dharani on youtube, it's in Sanskrit & so beautiful.
gassho
Rory
User avatar
rory
 
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 8:08 am
Location: SouthEast USA


Return to Pure Land

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

>