Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 6:11 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Rigpa vs. Nature of Mind
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 8:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 592
Is there a difference? Or just a different way of translating things?

I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 9:52 pm 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:12 pm
Posts: 1062
Clarence wrote:
Is there a difference? Or just a different way of translating things?

I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.


It's my understanding that the Nyingma separate mind, the nature of mind and rigpa. The nature of mind is emptiness whereas rigpa is emptiness, clarity and energy. From what I can tell this differentiation isn't made in in more informal teachings where the discussion is just about sem and rigpa.

_________________
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 10:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
Hayagriva wrote:
Clarence wrote:
Is there a difference? Or just a different way of translating things?

I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.


It's my understanding that the Nyingma separate mind, the nature of mind and rigpa. The nature of mind is emptiness whereas rigpa is emptiness, clarity and energy. From what I can tell this differentiation isn't made in in more informal teachings where the discussion is just about sem and rigpa.


Not right, nature of mind is rigpa at least in a Nyingma context. Check out Longchenpa.

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 10:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:01 pm
Posts: 291
all this distinction is not really necessary.. Even the distinction between sem and rigpa is just a method, provisional at best. What we need is direct perception (ngon gsum)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
heart wrote:
Hayagriva wrote:
Clarence wrote:
Is there a difference? Or just a different way of translating things?

I don't know how much we can ask here about specific ways of looking at the mind or not, so I will wait with those.


It's my understanding that the Nyingma separate mind, the nature of mind and rigpa. The nature of mind is emptiness whereas rigpa is emptiness, clarity and energy. From what I can tell this differentiation isn't made in in more informal teachings where the discussion is just about sem and rigpa.


Not right, nature of mind is rigpa at least in a Nyingma context. Check out Longchenpa.

/magnus



This is more according to sems sde. Man ngag sde is a bit different.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
tamdrin wrote:
all this distinction is not really necessary.. Even the distinction between sem and rigpa is just a method, provisional at best. What we need is direct perception (ngon gsum)



In Dzogchen, the differentiation between sems and rigpa is critical. Not just method.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 10:37 pm 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:12 pm
Posts: 1062
Is rigpa a term that's even used much in semde? Seems that semde talks about chang chub sem.

_________________
Look at the unfathomable spinelessness of man: all the means he's been given to stay alert he uses, in the end, to ornament his sleep. – Rene Daumal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 10:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Hayagriva wrote:
Is rigpa a term that's even used much in semde? Seems that semde talks about chang chub sem.



No it is not used that much in primary sems sde texts, but is used more in commentaries on those texts.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 12:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:28 pm
Posts: 698
Is rigpa = nibbana?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 1:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
Nosta wrote:
Is rigpa = nibbana?



No.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 8:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 600
Location: kent
what about instant presence ?
Its a concept which i am not familiar with and about which CNNR talks a lot.

In the teachings i was given we were never told about things like this ,only about ways of looking at the mind and discovering the natural state-rigpa

Instant presence seems to me more like another gate to go trough before you get to rigpa.

But i was never taught this way.I was told more like look into "that" rest and "voila".I seemed more like a two step approach rather than an three step one as in CNNR approach where you are mindfull then you get into instant presence and from this into rigpa.

Am i missing something?

_________________
AOM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
Namdrol wrote:
heart wrote:

Not right, nature of mind is rigpa at least in a Nyingma context. Check out Longchenpa.

/magnus



This is more according to sems sde. Man ngag sde is a bit different.


It is not that different since also in Semde the differentiation between rigpa and sem is also of critical importance.

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
tamdrin wrote:
all this distinction is not really necessary.. Even the distinction between sem and rigpa is just a method, provisional at best. What we need is direct perception (ngon gsum)


"ngon gsum"? You mean "mngon gsum" http://rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php/mngon_sum ? I don't understand how that has anything to do with the distinction between rigpa and the nature of mind.

The distinction between sem and rigpa is not an intellectual idea you know, it is something that becomes increasingly obvious through the direct introduction in Dzogchen. In Mahamudra this distinction is done in gradually on the path and in Dzogchen it is done in the beginning of the path. This is according to my master that teach both.

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 12:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:19 am
Posts: 1030
Location: Southern Oregon
alpha wrote:
...seemed more like a two step approach rather than an three step one as in CNNR approach where you are mindfull then you get into instant presence and from this into rigpa.

Am i missing something?


"Instant presence" is just a translation ChNNR often uses for "rigpa."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
heart wrote:
Namdrol wrote:
heart wrote:

Not right, nature of mind is rigpa at least in a Nyingma context. Check out Longchenpa.

/magnus



This is more according to sems sde. Man ngag sde is a bit different.


It is not that different since also in Semde the differentiation between rigpa and sem is also of critical importance.

/magnus



Hi MAgnus:

We already had this discussion on e-sangha. Pointless to rehash it again. Believe whatever you like.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:22 pm
Posts: 386
Location: Waponi Woo
Namdrol wrote:
Hi MAgnus:

We already had this discussion on e-sangha. Pointless to rehash it again. Believe whatever you like.


But.... i thought we were recreating all the drama of E-sangha... I mean, where else am I gunna get my soaps? :popcorn:

_________________
"Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise." --Surangama Sutra

Phenomenon, vast as space, dharmata is your base, arising and falling like ocean tide cycles, why do i cling to your illusion of unceasing changlessness?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 6:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 592
Well, maybe we can recreate the subject without the drama? I would be interesting to hear the difference between the two. I vaguely remember there was thread on it on E-sangha, but don't remember the content.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
Namdrol wrote:
Hi MAgnus:

We already had this discussion on e-sangha. Pointless to rehash it again. Believe whatever you like.


Yes Namdrol, you and me have done that, not everyone present here at this time.

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2011 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 3142
Clarence wrote:
Well, maybe we can recreate the subject without the drama? I would be interesting to hear the difference between the two. I vaguely remember there was thread on it on E-sangha, but don't remember the content.


Well Clarence, it might seem like there would be a difference in Dzogchen since they push so hard on the separation of mind and rigpa. So some thinks that the "nature of mind" means the nature of confusion. But in the Dzogchen teachings (the Menagkde) one also say that mind (sem), our thoughts and emotions, is the expression of awareness (rigpa). So if you understand that statement you also understand why one could say that the nature of mind is synonymous with rigpa. However, in practical application Mahamudra practitioners don't separate mind and rigpa from the beginning, but rather let mind and rigpa separate naturally on the path, so from that point of view there could become some confusion saying that the "nature of mind" of a beginner practitioner of Mahamudra and rigpa are the same. But ultimately when you say "nature of mind" you are talking about the result of the practice, the Buddha nature. Ultimately all the Buddhas teachings are pointing to the Buddha nature for this reason they say the Buddhas teachings like a piece of sugar is sweet wherever you taste it. If you want to understand more about this I would suggest that you read Tsele Natsok Rangdrols "Heart of the matter" or if you got a copy his Dzogchen text "Circle of the Sun".

/magnus

_________________
"To reject practice by saying, 'it is conceptual!' is the path of fools. A tendency of the inexperienced and something to be avoided."
- Longchenpa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 22, 2011 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12736
heart wrote:
But in the Dzogchen teachings (the Menagkde) one also say that mind (sem), our thoughts and emotions, is the expression of awareness (rigpa).



This is misleading.

In Upadesha, mind is variously said to be the mixture of the rtsal energy of vidyā and the karmic vāyus, the vāyu itself, and so on. Mind has a different location in the body than vidyā; different pathways than vidyā, and so on.

Whereas in sems de the nature of the mind is considered to be bodhicitta.

So this question really does depend on what Dzogchen teaching one is discussing it cannot be simplistically reduced to the statement "rigpa is the nature of the mind."

N

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group