gregkavarnos wrote:Or it is some Confucianism creeping into his Buddhism?Anders Honore wrote:...If he said this, it almost certainly had some solid scriptural basis...
Not likely. The whole reason Xuanzang went to India was that he was concerned that Buddhism was becoming corrupted by the sinofication of Buddhism and that it was no longer true to the Buddhism taught in India. He spent 20 years going there and back in order to learn Indian Buddhism and transmit it properly back to China. And when he did, he was at the heart of an ideological debate between him and Fazang that would shape the development of Chinese Buddhism in the centuries to come in regards to whether there should be a reversal to a more strictly Indian Buddhism grounded in Indian Buddhist logic, or whether the developments peculiar to east-Asian Buddhism should dictate the baseline. In the end, Fazang largely came out on top and today Yogacara is often referred to in the derogatory name he gave it, faxiang (dharma characteristic), rather than what they called themselved, weishi (consciousnesness only).
Xuanzang really doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who would goof all that up by succumbing to Confucian lore if he wasn't convinced this was thoroughly compatible with Mahayana Buddhism. It would kinda defeat the purpose of his lifework.


