Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:41 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
TMingyur: "No I am far from claiming this, but it is a try to point at the difference between the Buddhas teachings and the teachings of what I call "philosophers"."

From one concept another comes about what we seem to percieve in that way and so we create our little limited world by rejection/acception.

no one labeling object is the problem but our own misperception, our own grasping.

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:28 am
Posts: 806
TMingyur wrote:
Sherab wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
Dharma is 'wisdom' but cannot be learned by means of tenets and conceptual views taught by a teacher other than the Buddha although there is insistence that this may be so.

According to your view, we should ignore all the teachings given by the disciples of the Buddha. Sounds like a good example of "the thicket of views".


Unfounded conclusion.

Kind regards

My conclusion logically inferred from your statement. What is the basis of your reply of "unfounded conclusion"?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:04 am 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Dear Retro,
you said:
retrofuturist wrote:
This depicts very much an all-or-nothing form of enlightenment (what about lesser stream entrants, stream entrants, anagamis, arahants, sammasambuddhas, bodhisattvas etc.) To imply that anyone short of the "fully enlightened" is always espousing (unsubstantiated) views seems too binary to me.

But in this topic here viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2860&start=120 it was implied that some topics are beyond the range of the non-aryan mindstream or can only be approached by a bodhisattva of the sixth level and lower when they are in meditation. Well I don't know if any of us here fit into either of these categories so I just have to surmise that we are all expounding views here. Now whether they are substantiated or not is a issue that you have raised, maybe we could discuss it in this thread given its title and given that the thread had veered off track anyway (though it is kind of relevant).
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
Just using Buddhism as another form of clinging, clinging to views=merely grasping to cosy fitting samsara game of Buddhism. the door for compassion and ones own grow of insight remains closed in limitation.

Some did not suffer enough, a friend said. At least not all so called Buddhists are with the aim to get rightenesses, or worldly fame-aim.

Of course: all teaching methods what fit me, is 'revealing' wisdom, what fits not is rubbish. strange, this is not so the same for my neighbour. :tongue:

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:43 pm 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Views of the Thicket
Attachment:
thicket.jpg
thicket.jpg [ 16.51 KiB | Viewed 765 times ]

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 1782
muni wrote:
TMingyur: "No I am far from claiming this, but it is a try to point at the difference between the Buddhas teachings and the teachings of what I call "philosophers"."

From one concept another comes about what we seem to percieve in that way and so we create our little limited world by rejection/acception.

no one labeling object is the problem but our own misperception, our own grasping.


Discerning difference does not necessarily go together with rejection/acception. Does it appear that way to you?

Perhaps "appropriate" and "non-appropriate" are better?

Kind regards


Last edited by ground on Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:59 am
Posts: 3996
Cleaning in progress. Back to this post viewtopic.php?f=66&t=3746&start=60#p34195

TMingyur wrote:
Well sorry then I cannot take it serious. So you may just refrain from responding to my questions. Especially if those are not adressed to you.


This is a public forum. Every post in every topic is there for any member to respond to, even those posts which have addressed to a specific individual (it seems).

The reason for the underlined section of the bolded out part above is to show how double standards arise (i.e. 'do as I say not as I do') please see this post viewtopic.php?f=66&t=3746&start=60#p34195 where a member responds to a post specifically addressed to another member viewtopic.php?f=66&t=3746&start=60#p34193. (Just because one does not appreciate or like a response to one's posting is no reason to lay down rules, especially if one does not abide by one's own rules thus establishing a double standard.)

Communicating/communication is difficult at the best of times. Layering one's own rules (double standards in this instance) on top of the existing Forum rules potentially creates causes for off topic posts some of which contain personal attacks and comments about other members adding to the chaos, all of which can result in the topic deviating from the OP and degenerating with Moderators having to spend time trawling through topics to weed out posts which are out of order.

Regards,
rt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:59 am
Posts: 3996
Topic unlocked. Several off topic posts have been deleted (not all so as to retain some semblance of flow).

POLITE REMINDER

Please endeavour to stay on topic and refrain from personal attacks or making comments about other members.

Regards,
rt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3043
TMingyur wrote:
muni wrote:
TMingyur: "No I am far from claiming this, but it is a try to point at the difference between the Buddhas teachings and the teachings of what I call "philosophers"."

From one concept another comes about what we seem to percieve in that way and so we create our little limited world by rejection/acception.

no one labeling object is the problem but our own misperception, our own grasping.


Discerning difference does not necessarily go together with rejection/acception. Does it appear that way to you?

Perhaps "appropriate" and "non-appropriate" are better?

Kind regards



While how all is, is not conditioned by any prefered choice, still appropriate teaching - mind in a way which gives fully confidence, trust to cut through all misperception to undo suffering.

the diversity of the teachings spread (also on internet) seems not to make it easier.

_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG_lNuNUVd4


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 1782
That was a good sweeping.


rainbowtara wrote:
Please endeavour to stay on topic ...


Yes!

And returning to the OP's questions:
TMingyur wrote:
Why is this? What makes non-differentiating, all-inclusive fabrications so attractive?


I consider the questions to have been answered exhaustively.


Thanks to all who participated ... passionately or dispassionately.


Kind regards


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:10 pm 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
TMingyur wrote:
No I am far from claiming this, but it is a try to point at the difference between the Buddhas teachings and the teachings of what I call "philosophers".
You may be surprised to know that some of us here consider Nagarjuna a Buddha, Guru Padmasambhava a Buddha and our own teacher a Buddha (amongst others) so before you throw around your labels it might pay to be a bit more subtle (and justify your claims). Anyway, if I remember correctly in another thread you stated that you did not even consider Nagarjuna a philosopher.
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 1782
gregkavarnos wrote:
Anyway, if I remember correctly in another thread you stated that you did not even consider Nagarjuna a philosopher.


"Good" or "bad"?

Kind regards


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:50 pm 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
TMingyur wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote:
Anyway, if I remember correctly in another thread you stated that you did not even consider Nagarjuna a philosopher.


"Good" or "bad"?

Kind regards

You figure it out.

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:36 pm
Posts: 477
gregkavarnos wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote:
Anyway, if I remember correctly in another thread you stated that you did not even consider Nagarjuna a philosopher.


"Good" or "bad"?

Kind regards

You figure it out.

Greg you can't get upset over other's views....
i don't think nagajuna was real...i started a thread on it..

it seems fishy to me :thinking:

_________________
Love Love Love


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:02 pm 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Not talking about Nagarjuna, talking about inconstancy of views.
:namaste:

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
Post removed by author. Off topic.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:36 pm
Posts: 477
gregkavarnos wrote:
Not talking about Nagarjuna, talking about inconstancy of views.
:namaste:

i had the same thing with Namdrol...and you got upset with me for it....

i don't dig the whole new age Buddhist stuff...and prefer classical training by real teachers...

everyone let Namdrol slide on by with a mish mash....

why?

and then you get upset cause you think Tmingy is a lil off on his empty view ....

it's quite possible, and i am starting to believe it...that TMingy has the view the Buddha left behind...

He sees it at is written and taught with the original stuff not the sci fi mahayana stuff...

not that i am discrediting mahayana ...but a lot of it is unbelievably sci fi....

my view has changed on the teachings as I grew...and was shown things

i believed in the lotus sutra ...word for word....i thought it was like a real event that certain people saw and heard...

if your going to believe Kumarajiva's mermaid stuff is real...then you should not get upset woth my statements of completion stage Holy alchemy stuff either....

_________________
Love Love Love


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
Rael wrote:
gregkavarnos wrote:
Not talking about Nagarjuna, talking about inconstancy of views.
:namaste:

i had the same thing with Namdrol...and you got upset with me for it....

i don't dig the whole new age Buddhist stuff...and prefer classical training by real teachers...

everyone let Namdrol slide on by with a mish mash....

why?

and then you get upset cause you think Tmingy is a lil off on his empty view ....

it's quite possible, and i am starting to believe it...that TMingy has the view the Buddha left behind...

He sees it at is written and taught with the original stuff not the sci fi mahayana stuff...

not that i am discrediting mahayana ...but a lot of it is unbelievably sci fi....

my view has changed on the teachings as I grew...and was shown things

i believed in the lotus sutra ...word for word....i thought it was like a real event that certain people saw and heard...

if your going to believe Kumarajiva's mermaid stuff is real...then you should not get upset woth my statements of completion stage Holy alchemy stuff either....


If you have a hard time parsing parable from literal representation then Mahayana is most definitely not for you.
Both you and Tmingyur would most likely be much more comfortable in a Theravada setting.
My suggestion would be for you both to fully explore that realm and leave the Mahayana/Vajrayana to others.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am
Posts: 1782
Nangwa wrote:
My suggestion would be for you both to fully explore that realm and leave the Mahayana/Vajrayana to others.


We may find a compromise as to vajrayana but I will not negotiate Mahayana with you.


Kind regards


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The thicket of views
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 1565
TMingyur wrote:
Nangwa wrote:
My suggestion would be for you both to fully explore that realm and leave the Mahayana/Vajrayana to others.


We may find a compromise as to vajrayana but I will not negotiate Mahayana with you.


Kind regards

I dont care.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: conebeckham, heart, LastLegend and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group