Rael wrote:i reject all such until there are verified enlightened beings...everyone else is just one or two shades up or below.....
Not even the Buddha was a "verified" enlightened being.
Rael wrote:i reject all such until there are verified enlightened beings...everyone else is just one or two shades up or below.....
Awwwww... please don't go Rael, we'll miss your dog and pony if you go!Rael wrote:i'll take me dog and pony show somewhere's else....

Namdrol wrote:Rael wrote:i reject all such until there are verified enlightened beings...everyone else is just one or two shades up or below.....
Not even the Buddha was a "verified" enlightened being.
Rael wrote:Namdrol wrote:Rael wrote:i reject all such until there are verified enlightened beings...everyone else is just one or two shades up or below.....
Not even the Buddha was a "verified" enlightened being.
i should have made clear that it would have to be a face to face....
usually someone who knocks me for me grammar....clue one...the person is tainted .....
now my criteria for enlightenment is such...and i know it when i see it when i spend enough time with someone if they are....
Namdrol wrote:Rael wrote:Namdrol wrote:
Not even the Buddha was a "verified" enlightened being.
i should have made clear that it would have to be a face to face....
Not even then. Countless people met the Buddha and had no idea he was any different than countless other teachers.
Users browsing this forum: Dharma Bum and 11 guests