Paramitas vs. Eightfold Noble Path

Discuss and learn about the traditional Mahayana scriptures, without assuming that any one school ‘owns’ the only correct interpretation.
Post Reply
Huseng
Former staff member
Posts: 6336
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm

Paramitas vs. Eightfold Noble Path

Post by Huseng »

plwk wrote:I don't have my notes with me now but if I recall correctly, in Mahayana, the first three of the 4NT are considered as the provisional and the Fourth Noble Truth which has the Eightfold Path is the 'ultimate' right? I recall this thread http://dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=407" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Generally speaking in Mahāyāna the six pāramitā (perfections) take precedence over the Eightfold Noble Path.

Historically the Eightfold Noble Path seems to have generally been classified as a Śrāvakayāna teaching while the superior pāramitās were of the Mahāyāna.
Anders
Posts: 1440
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: Four Holy Truths chapter of Avatamsaka Sutra

Post by Anders »

Huseng wrote:
plwk wrote:I don't have my notes with me now but if I recall correctly, in Mahayana, the first three of the 4NT are considered as the provisional and the Fourth Noble Truth which has the Eightfold Path is the 'ultimate' right? I recall this thread http://dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=407" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Generally speaking in Mahāyāna the six pāramitā (perfections) take precedence over the Eightfold Noble Path.

Historically the Eightfold Noble Path seems to have generally been classified as a Śrāvakayāna teaching while the superior pāramitās were of the Mahāyāna.
Image

Whilst the paramitas are definitely the preferred scheme in Mahayana scripture, I don't recall coming across many takes claiming it as a superior set of practices (except maybe Prajnaparamita). Nagarjuna, in the upadesha, actually devotes a large amount of space to refute this very notion, along with detailed explanations of how these are understood in the Mahayana vis-a-vis Hinayana. IIRC Asangha also devotes some space to making this point somewhere.
"Even if my body should be burnt to death in the fires of hell
I would endure it for myriad lifetimes
As your companion in practice"

--- Gandavyuha Sutra
Huseng
Former staff member
Posts: 6336
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm

Re: Four Holy Truths chapter of Avatamsaka Sutra

Post by Huseng »

Anders Honore wrote: Whilst the paramitas are definitely the preferred scheme in Mahayana scripture, I don't recall coming across many takes claiming it as a superior set of practices (except maybe Prajnaparamita). Nagarjuna, in the upadesha, actually devotes a large amount of space to refute this very notion, along with detailed explanations of how these are understood in the Mahayana vis-a-vis Hinayana. IIRC Asangha also devotes some space to making this point somewhere.
I've noticed that the pāramitās get far more attention than the Eightfold Noble Path in Mahāyāna literature. This is probably because while the Eightfold Noble Path was taught to the disciples, they were not taught the pāramitās which are practices directed at Buddhahood via a Bodhisattva career.

In general it seems that Mahāyāna proponents naturally had a preference for the pāramitās rather than the practices of the Eightfold Noble Path. This makes sense because the Eightfold Noble Path was taught in a Śrāvakayāna context.
User avatar
Dexing
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:41 am

Re: Four Holy Truths chapter of Avatamsaka Sutra

Post by Dexing »

Anders Honore wrote:IIRC Asangha also devotes some space to making this point somewhere.
In the Pāli texts the Fourth Noble Truth is always defined as the Noble Eightfold Path. However, the way in which Asaṅga treats the Truth of the Path (mārgasatya) in his Abhidharmasamuccaya in completely different. According to him, the "path" consists of five categories.

The Noble Eightfold Path is but a single aspect among many of the Path of Mental Cultivation (bhāvanāmārga), called the Path Leading to Purity and Emancipation (viśuddhinairyāṇikamārga).

This does not mean any aspect of the path is higher or lower, but it places the Noble Eightfold Path within a larger frame. Whereas to the Śrāvakas, it's place seemed much more enlarged as this was the entire path.

On the other hand, for the Mahāyānika what seems to be repeatedly emphasized in a similar fashion is indeed the Pāramitās.

:namaste:
nopalabhyate...
User avatar
ground
Posts: 1782
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am

Re: Paramitas vs. Eightfold Noble Path

Post by ground »

Huseng wrote:Generally speaking in Mahāyāna the six pāramitā (perfections) take precedence over the Eightfold Noble Path.
I do not agree because the paramitas are the manifestation of the practice of the 8fold path. Lama Tsongkhapa puts it as "the three principle aspects of the path" which are renunciation, bodhicitta and wisdom. Renunciation and wisdom completely comprise or are the 8fold noble path.

Kind regards
Huseng
Former staff member
Posts: 6336
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:19 pm

Re: Paramitas vs. Eightfold Noble Path

Post by Huseng »

TMingyur wrote:
Huseng wrote:Generally speaking in Mahāyāna the six pāramitā (perfections) take precedence over the Eightfold Noble Path.
I do not agree because the paramitas are the manifestation of the practice of the 8fold path. Lama Tsongkhapa puts it as "the three principle aspects of the path" which are renunciation, bodhicitta and wisdom. Renunciation and wisdom completely comprise or are the 8fold noble path.

Kind regards
They are not mutually exclusive. However, the pāramitās are taught with Bodhisattva aspirants in mind.

Western Buddhists, Mahāyāna or not, tend to know more about the Eightfold Noble Path because of the tendency to rely on and defer to the Pali canon. Moreover it might be a result of western scholarship favouring an "original Buddhism" which would not include the six pāramitās.
User avatar
ground
Posts: 1782
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am

Re: Paramitas vs. Eightfold Noble Path

Post by ground »

Huseng wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
Huseng wrote:Generally speaking in Mahāyāna the six pāramitā (perfections) take precedence over the Eightfold Noble Path.
I do not agree because the paramitas are the manifestation of the practice of the 8fold path. Lama Tsongkhapa puts it as "the three principle aspects of the path" which are renunciation, bodhicitta and wisdom. Renunciation and wisdom completely comprise or are the 8fold noble path.

Kind regards
They are not mutually exclusive. However, the pāramitās are taught with Bodhisattva aspirants in mind.

Western Buddhists, Mahāyāna or not, tend to know more about the Eightfold Noble Path because of the tendency to rely on and defer to the Pali canon. Moreover it might be a result of western scholarship favouring an "original Buddhism" which would not include the six pāramitās.
Aha .. Lama Tsongkhapa is a western buddhist ... I see.

Kind regards
DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 9466
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm

Re: Paramitas vs. Eightfold Noble Path

Post by DGA »

I think it's plausible to consider that many Western Buddhists are more familiar with the 8-fold path schema than the 6 paramitas schema because it usually comes first in the books... people remember the early chapters more than the later ones, if they finish the book at all.

By contrast, when Buddhism is taught in East Asia, the paramitas are presented earlier.

my point is that the difference may be pedagogic (what do you teach first?) rather than doctrinal (what's more important?).
User avatar
swampflower
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:18 pm
Location: Bellefonte, PA

Re: Paramitas vs. Eightfold Noble Path

Post by swampflower »

HA ha, what is this vs.?
There is no versus, no competition.
This is all part of the Fourth Noble Truth. There is a Path to end Samsara.
One should not confuse this and think, "Oh, this is the higher Path, and this is the lesser Path"
However there are Stages to the Path.
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
Post Reply

Return to “Sūtra Studies”