Pema Rigdzin wrote:I think this is all speculation and wishful thinking, and assumes that non-Buddhists would have to depend on Buddhism in order to recognize common sense wisdom.

Dexing wrote:Pema Rigdzin wrote:I think this is all speculation and wishful thinking, and assumes that non-Buddhists would have to depend on Buddhism in order to recognize common sense wisdom.
I think this is the key. All those similarities are not because one is taking from another. That sort of "common sense wisdom" as taught by Jesus is not particularly Buddhist wisdom at all. What might be considered more Buddhist wisdom is that of emptiness, transcendental wisdom.
Jesus never taught that as far as I can see. He taught worldly wisdom and morality only. Nice as they are, they lack liberating power and insight
Nosta wrote:No, i am not saying that he was a secret boddhisatva. What i was thinking is, if indeed he entered India, probably he "stole" some buddhist concepts to his own doctrines.
Do you know any good books talking on the subject (buddhismo and Jesus)?
meindzai wrote:Jesus's teachings would be categorized as eternalism, a wrong view in Buddhism.
retrofuturist wrote:Yet, some people, for some reason, insist on try to find commonalities between Buddhism and Christianity... paving over the crevices in order to build some kind of bridge between them. But for what purpose...? I've never understood.
retrofuturist wrote:Indeed - it's very simple to demonstrate, in a short period of time that Jesus was neither a Buddhist, Buddha, nor bodhisattva.
Tilopa wrote:Unless you have the clairvoyance that correctly understand the minds of others it's almost impossible to know who is and who isn't a buddha or bodhisattva.
Su DongPo wrote:Are compassion and forgiveness wrong view then?
Su DongPo wrote:I know you don't mean this, but what do you mean?
Bodhisattvas will do whatever is beneficial for living beings and they don't always manifest as teachers of dharma. That is one form they commonly take but by no means the only one. They can also be poets, artists, musicians, politicians, social activists and even practitioners of non dharmic religions - in fact anything at all and that's why without clairvoyance you can't say for sure that your pet dog or your next door neighbour isn't a bodhisattva or manifestation of the buddha.retrofuturist wrote:You don't need to read their minds... you simply need to hear them teach that which the Buddha explicitly denounced as Wrong View.
You're not suggesting that a bodhisattva might intentionally teach Wrong View as "skillful means" are you?
Tilopa wrote:You're not suggesting that a bodhisattva might intentionally teach Wrong View as "skillful means" are you?
They might. But it would depend on the situation. What wrong view are you referring to?
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Tilopa,Tilopa wrote:You're not suggesting that a bodhisattva might intentionally teach Wrong View as "skillful means" are you?
They might. But it would depend on the situation. What wrong view are you referring to?
Take the examples in my last post, for example.
Metta,
Retro.
Tilopa wrote:You're not suggesting that a bodhisattva might intentionally teach Wrong View as "skillful means" are you?
Why not?...
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Tilopa,Tilopa wrote:You're not suggesting that a bodhisattva might intentionally teach Wrong View as "skillful means" are you?
Why not?...
The 4th bodhisattva vow for one, i.e. not to lie or use false speech
Maitri,
Retro.
).Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests