On how the skandhas are self

General discussion, particularly exploring the Dharma in the modern world.
Post Reply
User avatar
Aemilius
Posts: 4604
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:44 am

On how the skandhas are self

Post by Aemilius »

Human beings, and other beings, have different selves, they have different identities.These are mental events of identifying with form, sensation, conceptualization and volition skandhas ( first four among the five aggregates). Identity itself is mainly conceptualisation (samjna) and volition (samskara) skandhas.
These selves are for example:
Nationality self
Species self; you are human, or you are dog, horse, fox, vulture, snake, etc.. or you are a deva, asura, naga, rakshasa and so on...
Racial self; you are white, yellow, black, red, or something else,
Professional self; you are a plumber, airplanemechanic, salesperson, schoolteacher, nurse, military person, etc...
Political self
Religious self
Sexual self
Sports self
Hobby self
etc...
You are these selves even in your dream state.

In the end, when you get old, and when you die, these selves gradually dissolve, they become nothing, you yourself become nothing, these selves turn out to be without permanent reality,...
svaha
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
White Lotus
Posts: 1333
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: On how the skandhas are self

Post by White Lotus »

there is a mundane self, impermanent and impure.
with cessation of the mundane self is the Self, true self/mind/own nature.

sutta nipata 761. the holy ones know it as highest bliss, the cessation of the self. repugnant to worldly folks, but not to those that clearly see.

fundamentally there has never been a self of any kind, not a thing. to speak of a self is to speak discriminatively about a dream, an illusion.

conventional truth is negated by fundamental truth.

rgds white lotus.
in any matters of importance. dont rely on me. i may not know what i am talking about. take what i say as mere speculation. i am not ordained. nor do i have a formal training. i do believe though that if i am wrong on any point. there are those on this site who i hope will quickly point out my mistakes.
User avatar
ground
Posts: 1782
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:31 am

Re: On how the skandhas are self

Post by ground »

What a question "On how the skandhas are self"?

The skandas have been taught to negate the thought "self", "I" and "mine" and replace it through "aggregates". Thus it is an affirming negation.

The Mahayana philosophers have delved into absurdity when asking "In what way are the skandhas self?" or asking "Why are the skandhas not self?"

The Mahayana philosophers compare to someone entering a shop and asking "What do you have to sell?" and after having been told "Nothing" they say "Okay, please sell me three pounds of that nothing."


kind regards
User avatar
Aemilius
Posts: 4604
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:44 am

Re: On how the skandhas are self

Post by Aemilius »

TMingyur wrote:What a question "On how the skandhas are self"?

The skandas have been taught to negate the thought "self", "I" and "mine" and replace it through "aggregates". Thus it is an affirming negation.

The Mahayana philosophers have delved into absurdity when asking "In what way are the skandhas self?" or asking "Why are the skandhas not self?"

The Mahayana philosophers compare to someone entering a shop and asking "What do you have to sell?" and after having been told "Nothing" they say "Okay, please sell me three pounds of that nothing."


kind regards
There is no absurdity, because you still are something, you are a human. you have a passport, you have a nationality, you have a familytree, you have a profession, you have a social class, and so on...
For the purposes of meditating on selflessness you first of all have to understand what the self is, how it exists, in the skandhas.
Many buddhists who nominally claim selflessness will react angrily if they are called "negro", "gypsy", "russian", "swede", and so on...( providing that you don't have one of these identities, or selves, ofcourse!).
svaha
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
DGA
Former staff member
Posts: 9466
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:04 pm

Re: On how the skandhas are self

Post by DGA »

Aemilius wrote: There is no absurdity, because you still are something, you are a human. you have a passport, you have a nationality, you have a familytree, you have a profession, you have a social class, and so on...
For the purposes of meditating on selflessness you first of all have to understand what the self is, how it exists, in the skandhas.
Many buddhists who nominally claim selflessness will react angrily if they are called "negro", "gypsy", "russian", "swede", and so on...( providing that you don't have one of these identities, or selves, ofcourse!).
Yes, you are provisionally the name on your passport. Your are, provisionally and conventionally, that shape you call your body. But so what?

let's say you're a particular human being. Any particular human being is reducible to the five skandhas, which is to say, isn't really a coherent identity at all in an ultimate sense, it's a coincidence of five categories of impermanence.

my point: it would help to understand the Two Truths if you want to understand a Mahayana position on this topic
User avatar
catmoon
Former staff member
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: On how the skandhas are self

Post by catmoon »

If I have understood him, Lama Zopa says that the self exists, at least in some sense. He defines the self as a label applied to the association of mind and body. Since this label is commonly used and understood, it has a tenuous sort of existence, as a label. He also points out that since the label "self" is applied to an association of mind and body, it is a collective label, like the words "forest" and "army". There really is no separate thing from the trees called "forest" and there really is no separate thing from the soldiers called "army". Thus the existence of forests and armies are wholly dependent on the existence of soldiers and trees. Take away the trees and the forest does not remain.

In the same way, the trees and soldiers are dependent on their constituent parts, and those parts depend on their parts, all the way down. An independently existing part is never found.
Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.
User avatar
Aemilius
Posts: 4604
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:44 am

Re: On how the skandhas are self

Post by Aemilius »

Jikan wrote:
Aemilius wrote: There is no absurdity, because you still are something, you are a human. you have a passport, you have a nationality, you have a familytree, you have a profession, you have a social class, and so on...
For the purposes of meditating on selflessness you first of all have to understand what the self is, how it exists, in the skandhas.
Many buddhists who nominally claim selflessness will react angrily if they are called "negro", "gypsy", "russian", "swede", and so on...( providing that you don't have one of these identities, or selves, ofcourse!).
Yes, you are provisionally the name on your passport. Your are, provisionally and conventionally, that shape you call your body. But so what?

let's say you're a particular human being. Any particular human being is reducible to the five skandhas, which is to say, isn't really a coherent identity at all in an ultimate sense, it's a coincidence of five categories of impermanence.

my point: it would help to understand the Two Truths if you want to understand a Mahayana position on this topic
I don't know whether we disagree or not ? What I'm saying is that all identities I have mentioned ( nationality, ethnic group, family, profession, social class, sexuality, etc... ) are levels in Name and Form. And that it is useful to know them in order to understand what name and form signifies. They are subtly (or evidently) visible in your form, and they each have a name.
svaha
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē’pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1. (in english and sanskrit)
Post Reply

Return to “Dharma in Everyday Life”