Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Thu Dec 25, 2014 3:17 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2555
Well thank you for putting us right about what HHDL SHOULD have said... 8-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3044
Simon E. wrote:
Well thank you for putting us right about what HHDL SHOULD have said... 8-)


When I write it so, this means it is not dependent on whether he said that or not, rather dependent on the clarity of Mind. And I don't doubt His Holiness is not looking through compliment-giving clinging mind but wisdom.
Therefore no clinging flattery but genuine respect. Bodhichitta.

:yinyang:

_________________
There is only nature and all is nature. Any discrimination is ones’ own delusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2555
Yes.
As usual I have no idea what you are on about.
For which I will take responsibility.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 101
Location: Kalasindhu, Thailand
Simon E. wrote:
Yes.
As usual I have no idea what you are on about.
For which I will take responsibility.


Nor do I know what you are on about, sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 1:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2555
Shemmy wrote:
Simon E. wrote:
Yes.
As usual I have no idea what you are on about.
For which I will take responsibility.


Nor do I know what you are on about, sir.

Well thats OK then isn't it ? We can agree mutual bafflement. Thats quite alright too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 101
Location: Kalasindhu, Thailand
Dear Simon,

Seems that creating bafflement wasn't your intention a week ago, and you seemed to be trying to make a point saying you didn't "believe a word" of an account I'd posted on this thread. Perhaps the thrill of that bygone era has passed and I am merely passing gas with this posting, but the topic and the enigma of what you said is interesting to me. In fact, I decided not to do much formal practice tonight just so I could clarify things here and ask you to clarify your responses to my post.

Also, I did read your 2nd response to my story via your response to Admantine's post saying that he thought the story I recounted on this thread was true. If you cannot recall my story, it was regarding a Sikh guy who hosts Vajrayana teachers and a particular Nyingma lama who had said that it was true that Guru Nanak was indeed quite involved with Tibetan Buddhism for a time at the very least. Your response to Admantine's post was "people say all sorts of things don't they ?"

I then posted and asked you what you meant by saying you didn't believe a word of my story and it didn't seem as tho you would respond, perhaps you thought why bother he hasn't even read my second post and you seemed to be more concerned with hashing something out with Mr./Ms. Muni.

To clarify, I'd like to say I am sincerely interested to hear what you have to say about anything I had said in my story and why you think "people are say(ing) all sorts of things," whatever that means. I guess it means that you think that because people often speak without thinking too much about what they are saying that the Sikh and the lama were doing the same and we should just drop the topic and dismiss it as they are just saying things to pass the time or whatever? But I think it is clear that my host being from a Sikh background and who now seems to have converted to Buddhism and the lama regard such matters as being important enough as to not have just said any old thing. Think about it, it is quite likely that such matters would be important enough to such people as to not just sit down and start spinning fairy tales about Guru Nanak and Vajrayana between cracking their knuckles and singing old Kentucky whiskey drinking songs that they also had just made up. "Oh that old girl Virginia!/Why she shore could milk a cow!/Milked 5,000 in a day/And all the people said Oh Wow!" No. Both guys are commited practitioners so they would not take that kind of thing lightly.

Saying something non-baffling about what you know about Guru Nanak in Tibet or the connection of Dzogchen to Sikh philosophy and practice or lack thereof might be more interesting or even inspiring than some flash cryptic remarks or songs about cow milking. Perhaps there is something you know that I don't that would cause you to view the discussion on this thread or my story or things people said to me regarding Guru Nanak and Dzogchen as just things people say?

I don't post or comment hardly at all on this web site, so I don't think I would be just trying to fill the time with made up yarns or the kind of vaporous posts you seem to be suggesting I make. If you were annoyed by something I said on some other discussion topic, I apologize, I don't think I meant to piss you off.

If I have misinterpreted your recent remarks and taken the wrong end of the stick, then I apologize. But your aphoristic comments in response to my story run more of risk of misinterpretation, so maybe you would be generous enough to cut me a bit of slack and clarify what you had to say. As for any bafflement I may have just created, that is not my intention, thank you for being arsed enough to read this post this far and perhaps even respond.

Struggling here, Shem


Last edited by Adamantine on Sat Mar 08, 2014 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Corrected to address the correct recipient


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2555
Shemmy, why on earth would you do less practice tonight in order to communicate your beliefs to some anonymous guy on the internet ?
Seriously.
My views about your views need not concern you, and the degree of your concern seems at odds with the whole raison d'etre of Dzogchen.
:namaste:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:02 am 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:02 am
Posts: 1140
Virgo wrote:
deepbluehum wrote:
Sikhs go to worship the creator in the sky



I'm not normally one for New Agey music, but I did check out that link, and then I found this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3zUYK4YU8M

Regardless of the question at stake in this thread, it's pretty hard to deny what is beautiful.

:anjali:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 101
Location: Kalasindhu, Thailand
Simon E. wrote:
Shemmy, why on earth would you do less practice tonight in order to communicate your beliefs to some anonymous guy on the internet ?
Seriously.
My views about your views need not concern you, and the degree of your concern seems at odds with the whole raison d'etre of Dzogchen.
:namaste:


You are right, I should have spent my time practicing. But if your views need not concern me,then why suggest that they ought to by posting responses to my posts. That's a rhetorical question and I won't checking back in for the answer, so I wouldn't waste any more of your own time with any of this either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 112
tobes wrote:
Virgo wrote:
deepbluehum wrote:
Sikhs go to worship the creator in the sky



I'm not normally one for New Agey music, but I did check out that link, and then I found this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3zUYK4YU8M

Regardless of the question at stake in this thread, it's pretty hard to deny what is beautiful.

:anjali:


She isn't a sikh. Beautiful is the first time you listen to side 2 of Abbey Road. She is not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:04 am 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:02 am
Posts: 1140
If you don't hear beauty, you don't hear beauty. No problemo my friend.

:anjali:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 112
Her voice doesn't negate the cult she belongs to or the spiritual misguidance she transmits.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:46 am 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:02 am
Posts: 1140
Sherab Rigdrol wrote:
Her voice doesn't negate the cult she belongs to or the spiritual misguidance she transmits.


Jeez mate, way to lay a heavy trip on some sound.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:16 pm
Posts: 152
There are many shared elements across all mystical traditions. I would say that that is more the result of direct experiences of non-duality than direct influence but you never know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am
Posts: 3044
Vajraprajnakhadga wrote:
There are many shared elements across all mystical traditions. I would say that that is more the result of direct experiences of non-duality than direct influence but you never know.


Interesting. The "I-you" are artists, drawing ideas by percieved apprehended phenomenal differences. Therefore I don't know and I guess nondual nature has no thing to prove/divide.

Awaken guidance is not bounded.

_________________
There is only nature and all is nature. Any discrimination is ones’ own delusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group