dakini_boi wrote:Does anyone have a link to the interpretation of the 4 Noble Truths and 8-fold path, according to the Sutra of the Owl-Headed Dakini?
I was reading the wikipedia article on the Aro Gter lineage, and they mentioned this sutra - although I couldn't find any additional info on-line.
If anyone could provide a link - perhaps even a full translation of this Sutra of the Owl-Headed Dakini, that would be incredible!
Tilopa wrote:It's well known in Tibetan buddhist circles that Aro-Ter is a totally fake lineage. If you want to study Dzogchen do so with an authentic Nyingma lama.
dakini_boi wrote: but if Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche recognized Ngakpa Chogyam as a tulku
narraboth wrote:what I don't understand is: there must be a lot of people asked some qualified masters, but there's no comment from them at all?
narraboth wrote:Traditionally a new terma has to be checked and recognised by high lama, who's high enough to do this job. Khyentse wangpo did lots of this kind of works I have heard.
If aro gter was not in Tibetan, then it's hard for great master to check it I guess.
They said Dudjom Rinpoche recognised the terma but asked him to keep secret for 15 years. I am wondering what kind of text he showed to Rinpoche, if there was such a thing.
Usually the master who confirms the text needs to sign for the authenity, just like recognising a tulku needs a formal letter and a ceremony.
what I don't understand is: there must be a lot of people asked some qualified masters, but there's no comment from them at all?
About CR lama, I am a bit confused. didn't CR lama openly recognised him as a qualified teacher? (of course it's not totally related the authenity of terma, but....)
Heruka wrote:a student wants clarity, not confusion.
a teacher that adds confusion, is no teacher at all.
ngodrup wrote:Concerning Ngakpa Chogyam, also called Ngakchang Rinpoche,
there are many people who have opinions. I don't think many of
these people actually ever met him. Yet they "know." They certainly
haven't met any of the Tibetan Lamas who speak highly of him.
Suffice it to say that in some circles there seems to be some
controversy. Any Lama who accomplishes much, or seems eccentric
has his or her detractors. In the Vajrayana, we have to hold Pure
View and acknowledge that unusual teachings may be suitable for
some people. At the very least we can adopt an agnostic position.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests