Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2014 6:08 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: A common misperception.
PostPosted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
This is aimed at those who are newer to Dharma.

There is a prevailing view that the Dharma is the means to fix Samsara.
dharma is in fact the way to stop identifying with Samsara.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:46 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Posts: 2193
Simon E. wrote:
This is aimed at those who are newer to Dharma.

There is a prevailing view that the Dharma is the means to fix Samsara.
dharma is in fact the way to stop identifying with Samsara.

:good:


Good point, well stated. There is no ultimate lasting fix for samsara.

_________________
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am
Posts: 1471
Another common misperception is, with the use of the sanskrit word "samsara", most english users really don't know what it means. By keeping the sanskrit, or transliterating it, it quickly becomes a kind of a pronoun, a name for a "thing", or worse, the name of some "place" which one is "in".

Similar problems occur with the word "buddha", "dharma" and so on. As non-users of Indic languages, most do not and cannot see the basic meaning of these terms. eg. "buddha" becomes the name of a person, "Buddha", rather than an adjective, etc.

~~ Huifeng

_________________
My Prajñācāra Blog
Buddhist Studies at Fo Guang University, Taiwan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Gone Bush
Simon E. wrote:
This is aimed at those who are newer to Dharma.

There is a prevailing view that the Dharma is the means to fix Samsara.
dharma is in fact the way to stop identifying with Samsara.

Part of the confusion seems to stem from the bodhisattva ideal of remaining in samsara until all other beings are liberated. This may imply to some that samsara will eventually come to an end.

_________________
May all beings be happy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 732
Location: South Florida, USA
Stop identifying with samsara? But if "samsara is nirvana", what need is there to do that? Nirvana is free from suffering, is it not? So if you identify with Nirvana, where is the problem? :thinking:

_________________
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 1:41 am
Posts: 2845
seeker242 wrote:
Stop identifying with samsara? But if "samsara is nirvana", what need is there to do that? Nirvana is free from suffering, is it not? So if you identify with Nirvana, where is the problem? :thinking:


Samsara isn't nirvana.
Samsara is inseparable from nirvana.

There is a difference.
.
.
.

_________________
Profile Picture: "The Foaming Monk"
The Chinese characters are Fo (buddha) and Ming (bright). The image is of a student of Buddhism, who, imagining himself to be a monk, and not understanding the true meaning of the words takes the sound of the words literally. Likewise, People on web forums sometime seem to be foaming at the mouth.
Original painting by P.Volker /used by permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:51 am
Posts: 1471
The problems of mixing our metaphors...

~~ Huifeng

_________________
My Prajñācāra Blog
Buddhist Studies at Fo Guang University, Taiwan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
Huifeng wrote:
Another common misperception is, with the use of the sanskrit word "samsara", most english users really don't know what it means. By keeping the sanskrit, or transliterating it, it quickly becomes a kind of a pronoun, a name for a "thing", or worse, the name of some "place" which one is "in".

Similar problems occur with the word "buddha", "dharma" and so on. As non-users of Indic languages, most do not and cannot see the basic meaning of these terms. eg. "buddha" becomes the name of a person, "Buddha", rather than an adjective, etc.

~~ Huifeng

:namaste:
Something that makes sense to me Ven Huifeng is samsara as an activity. Something that we perpetuate...?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:35 am 
Online

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am
Posts: 2193
Huifeng wrote:
Another common misperception is, with the use of the sanskrit word "samsara", most english users really don't know what it means. By keeping the sanskrit, or transliterating it, it quickly becomes a kind of a pronoun, a name for a "thing", or worse, the name of some "place" which one is "in".

Similar problems occur with the word "buddha", "dharma" and so on. As non-users of Indic languages, most do not and cannot see the basic meaning of these terms. eg. "buddha" becomes the name of a person, "Buddha", rather than an adjective, etc.

~~ Huifeng

Samsara is the cycle of life, death and rebirth. Effectively that makes the period between birth and death, or in other words our entire lives, part of the cycle. So from the Shravakayana perspective if one is alive and continuing to create the conditions for further rebirth, one is "in" the cycle of samsara. When the Buddha spoke of his attainments he said, "I have ceased the outflows that made me human."

_________________
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 1596
Simon E. wrote:
dharma is in fact the way to stop identifying with Samsara.

Can you prove that it not just another misperception?

_________________
Say what you think about me here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
My views on this are not original. They are the views handed down to me by my teachers.
I am not going to respond to one of your word games Oushi. The ones where you set the rules and things mean what YOU decide they mean. I have seen you dealing from the bottom of the pack too many times... :tongue:


Last edited by Seishin on Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Removal of personal information


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:18 am
Posts: 1596
I think my question is valid, and a proper one. You may run from it, to personal stuff, but it will not help. I have nothing to be ashamed of.
You want to cure people from their misperceptions while everything you have is a... belief that your teacher was correct and you understood him correctly. That's your belief, I ask for a proof. You seem to have problem with those.

_________________
Say what you think about me here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
smcj wrote:
Huifeng wrote:
Another common misperception is, with the use of the sanskrit word "samsara", most english users really don't know what it means. By keeping the sanskrit, or transliterating it, it quickly becomes a kind of a pronoun, a name for a "thing", or worse, the name of some "place" which one is "in".

Similar problems occur with the word "buddha", "dharma" and so on. As non-users of Indic languages, most do not and cannot see the basic meaning of these terms. eg. "buddha" becomes the name of a person, "Buddha", rather than an adjective, etc.

~~ Huifeng

Samsara is the cycle of life, death and rebirth. Effectively that makes the period between birth and death, or in other words our entire lives, part of the cycle. So from the Shravakayana perspective if one is alive and continuing to create the conditions for further rebirth, one is "in" the cycle of samsara. When the Buddha spoke of his attainments he said, "I have ceased the outflows that made me human."

Given that these are no one to one substitutes in any modern language do you see any way forward here Venerable ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:01 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:53 am
Posts: 1468
I think a proper understanding of the words is the way forward for sure. Like Ven Huifeng said, if you understand the word "samsara" properly then the concept of "improving samsara" would hold no meaning

Gassho,
Seishin

_________________
http://tendaiuk.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
Hence the thread....which was prompted by yet another discussion..on another forum, which indicated that somehow samsara could be fixed, and that the purpose of Buddhadharma was evolutionary...and would result in a superior humanity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:07 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:53 am
Posts: 1468
oushi wrote:
Simon E. wrote:
dharma is in fact the way to stop identifying with Samsara.

Can you prove that it not just another misperception?


Simon E. wrote:
Hence the thread....which was prompted by yet another discussion..on another forum, which indicated that somehow samsara could be fixed, and that the purpose of Buddhadharma was evolutionary...and would result in a superior humanity.


Quote:
Samsara literally means "wandering-on." Many people think of it as the Buddhist name for the place where we currently live — the place we leave when we go to nibbana. But in the early Buddhist texts, it's the answer, not to the question, "Where are we?" but to the question, "What are we doing?" Instead of a place, it's a process: the tendency to keep creating worlds and then moving into them. As one world falls apart, you create another one and go there. At the same time, you bump into other people who are creating their own worlds, too.


http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... msara.html

_________________
http://tendaiuk.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:11 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:53 am
Posts: 1468
Quote:
This is why the Buddha tried to find the way to stop samsara-ing. Once he had found it, he encouraged others to follow it, too. Because samsara-ing is something that each of us does, each of us has to stop it him or her self alone. If samsara were a place, it might seem selfish for one person to look for an escape, leaving others behind. But when you realize that it's a process, there's nothing selfish about stopping it at all. It's like giving up an addiction or an abusive habit. When you learn the skills needed to stop creating your own worlds of suffering, you can share those skills with others so that they can stop creating theirs. At the same time, you'll never have to feed off the worlds of others, so to that extent you're lightening their load as well.

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... msara.html

_________________
http://tendaiuk.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am
Posts: 2552
Yes like 'ego' samsara is not a thing , but an activity. Self perpetuating and fuelled by wrong identification.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 732
Location: South Florida, USA
PadmaVonSamba wrote:
seeker242 wrote:
Stop identifying with samsara? But if "samsara is nirvana", what need is there to do that? Nirvana is free from suffering, is it not? So if you identify with Nirvana, where is the problem? :thinking:


Samsara isn't nirvana.
Samsara is inseparable from nirvana.

There is a difference.
.
.
.


What's the difference? If inseparable means "cannot be treated separately" then how can you say they are different?

_________________
One should not kill any living being, nor cause it to be killed, nor should one incite any other to kill. Do never injure any being, whether strong or weak, in this entire universe!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:39 pm 
Offline
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:53 am
Posts: 1468
Is = they are the same
Inseparable = unable to be separated. ie two different things that are intrinsically related

My 2 cents
Gassho,
Seishin

_________________
http://tendaiuk.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group