BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Whether you're exploring Buddhism for the first time or you're already on the path, feel free to ask questions of any kind here.

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby futerko » Tue Nov 26, 2013 4:47 am

Malcolm wrote:
futerko wrote:
smcj wrote: Whereas the Buddhists simply say that there is an infinite regression


No, they don't. The whole point of Buddhism is to avoid such an issue of infinite regress.


In fact, Budddhists accept certain kinds of infinite regression as a logical consequence of dependent origination, for example, the infinite regression of dependent causality.


The logical consequence of dependent origination is that nothing originates, nor has it ever, which is effectively the same as saying that there is no empirically infinite linear temporal duration.

Time and causality are "in mind" phenomena, which taken as concrete facts of existence, would render Buddhism an utterly pointless exercise in futility.
we cannot get rid of God because we still believe in grammar - Nietzsche
User avatar
futerko
 
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:58 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby smcj » Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:32 am

futerko wrote:The logical consequence of dependent origination is that nothing originates, nor has it ever...

That doesn't sound right. In fact, it sounds nihilistic...
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN
smcj
 
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby futerko » Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:40 am

smcj wrote:
futerko wrote:The logical consequence of dependent origination is that nothing originates, nor has it ever...

That doesn't sound right. In fact, it sounds nihilistic...


I'm sure Nagarjuna is tired of hearing that. :tongue:

...however I'm sure he won't fall into despair because of it!
we cannot get rid of God because we still believe in grammar - Nietzsche
User avatar
futerko
 
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:58 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby dude » Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:53 am

Nothing comes from nothing.
Anything that will always exist must have always existed in the past.
Hence Nagarjuna says "Nothing whatsoever arises."
dude
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 3:38 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby smcj » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:01 am

dude wrote:Nothing comes from nothing.
Anything that will always exist must have always existed in the past.
Hence Nagarjuna says "Nothing whatsoever arises."

My elementary school level educations on this was from the Gelug camp, and I think they have a different spin on this.
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN
smcj
 
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby dzogchungpa » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:09 am

From "Nagarjuna's Letter To A Friend", translated by the Padmakara group:
Although performing wrong and evil deeds
Does not at once, like swords, create a gash,
When death arrives, those evil acts will show,
Their karmic fruit will clearly be revealed.

The aggregates are not a simple whim,
From neither time nor nature do they come,
Nor by themselves, from God, or without cause;
Their source, you ought to know, is ignorance,
From karmic deeds and craving have they come.
ཨོཾ་ཏཱ་རེ་ཏུཏྟ་རེ་ཏུ་རེ་སྭཱཧཱ༔
User avatar
dzogchungpa
 
Posts: 2164
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 10:50 pm

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby dude » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:21 am

smcj wrote:
dude wrote:Nothing comes from nothing.
Anything that will always exist must have always existed in the past.
Hence Nagarjuna says "Nothing whatsoever arises."

My elementary school level educations on this was from the Gelug camp, and I think they have a different spin on this.


What's their spin on it?
dude
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 3:38 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby mindyourmind » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:22 am

smcj wrote:Where does karma/rebirth "come from"?=Where did God "come from"?


I already have that one in my reply. It seems so obvious to me.

Create your own non-answer (God did it) and then ask other religions why their answer is so "inadequate".

I see what you did there.
As bad as bad becomes its not a part of you

Talk Talk
User avatar
mindyourmind
 
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:11 am
Location: South Africa

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby mindyourmind » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:24 am

dzogchungpa wrote:From "Nagarjuna's Letter To A Friend", translated by the Padmakara group:
Although performing wrong and evil deeds
Does not at once, like swords, create a gash,
When death arrives, those evil acts will show,
Their karmic fruit will clearly be revealed.

The aggregates are not a simple whim,
From neither time nor nature do they come,
Nor by themselves, from God, or without cause;
Their source, you ought to know, is ignorance,
From karmic deeds and craving have they come.


That has just won me a case of beer. I will send you half, thanks :cheers:
As bad as bad becomes its not a part of you

Talk Talk
User avatar
mindyourmind
 
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:11 am
Location: South Africa

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby futerko » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:35 am

The karmic fruit is a half case of beer?!? :thinking:
we cannot get rid of God because we still believe in grammar - Nietzsche
User avatar
futerko
 
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:58 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby smcj » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:36 am

From: Je Tsongkhapa's "Three Principal Aspects of the Path".

Appearances are infallible dependent arisings;
Emptiness is free of assertions.
As long as these two understating (sic) are seen as separate,
One has not yet realized the intent of the Buddha.


So I guess Tsongkhapa thinks things do arise, of a sort…

From Malcolm in another thread:
The Gelug commitment to arguing essenceless existence is fruitless because there are is no such thing as an essenceless existence.

I like the idea of essenceless existence. It's the only way I can swallow any of the Mahyamaka. And personally I'm a Shengtongpa anyway, so I really don't care.
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN
smcj
 
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby mindyourmind » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:39 am

futerko wrote:The karmic fruit is a half case of beer?!? :thinking:



Sounds fair to me
As bad as bad becomes its not a part of you

Talk Talk
User avatar
mindyourmind
 
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:11 am
Location: South Africa

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby futerko » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:00 am

mindyourmind wrote:
futerko wrote:The karmic fruit is a half case of beer?!? :thinking:



Sounds fair to me


Karmic fruit beer, tastes ok at the time but leaves a bitter aftertaste. :tongue:
we cannot get rid of God because we still believe in grammar - Nietzsche
User avatar
futerko
 
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:58 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby muni » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:34 am

In space‘spaciousness (emptiness-interdependence, form-emptiness/emptiness-form), there is no cristallizing, no substantial samsara. But the creating mind is a magician.
Whether samsara or nirvana, Longchenpa: “the source is endless beginningless uncreated field of reality”. When a thought tries to understand this, cristallizing is a fact. Woopsee.

Oh, a master said on a travel to a religious one ( when he asked from what religion the master was) something like: "my God is from where your God is coming from" :smile: A created God as a thought its source is the uncreated field of reality.
muni
 
Posts: 2945
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby smcj » Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:55 am

Whether samsara or nirvana, Longchenpa: “the source is endless beginningless uncreated field of reality”. When a thought tries to understand this, cristallizing is a fact. Woopsee.

Longchenpa and Nagarjuna do not necessarily agree with each other.
A human being has his limits. And thus, in every conceivable way, with every possible means, he tries to make the teaching enter into his own limits. ChNN
smcj
 
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:13 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby muni » Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:00 am

smcj wrote:
Whether samsara or nirvana, Longchenpa: “the source is endless beginningless uncreated field of reality”. When a thought tries to understand this, cristallizing is a fact. Woopsee.

Longchenpa and Nagarjuna do not necessarily agree with each other.


No any importance for own practice. In constructed teachings are many seemingly contradictions about how all is.
muni
 
Posts: 2945
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:59 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby tatpurusa » Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:22 am

smcj wrote:
Whether samsara or nirvana, Longchenpa: “the source is endless beginningless uncreated field of reality”. When a thought tries to understand this, cristallizing is a fact. Woopsee.

Longchenpa and Nagarjuna do not necessarily agree with each other.


There are many contradictions arising during attempts of uttering the ineffable, conceptualizing the non-conceptual.
This is why philosophies are secondary to practice and experience.
tatpurusa
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:17 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby dude » Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:22 pm

tatpurusa wrote:
smcj wrote:
Whether samsara or nirvana, Longchenpa: “the source is endless beginningless uncreated field of reality”. When a thought tries to understand this, cristallizing is a fact. Woopsee.

Longchenpa and Nagarjuna do not necessarily agree with each other.


There are many contradictions arising during attempts of uttering the ineffable, sconceptualizing the non-conceptual.
This is why philosophies are secondary to practice and experience.


Exactly.
Without a determined effort to find out what the whole truth is for ourselves and resolve the contradictions, contemplating and debating abstract theory is nothing more than a frivolous pastime.
dude
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 3:38 am

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby Rasko » Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:58 pm

mindyourmind wrote:Along come the Buddhists, "believing" in karma and rebirth, but not in a creator god. To put it in its simplest form, where does karma / rebirth "come from"? Who created such an exquisitely complex system, if there is no god?

Please be as technical and detailed as you can, I have been bet a case of beer that the Buddhist cannot meaningfully answer this, and that the best we can do is to ask questions like "Who's asking" and "ask your teacher".


The beginning:
"From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on. Long have you thus experienced stress, experienced pain, experienced loss, swelling the cemeteries — enough to become disenchanted with all fabricated things, enough to become dispassionate, enough to be released."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html

The end:
"I tell you, friend, that it is not possible by traveling to know or see or reach a far end of the cosmos where one does not take birth, age, die, pass away, or reappear. But at the same time, I tell you that there is no making an end of suffering & stress without reaching the end of the cosmos. Yet it is just within this fathom-long body, with its perception & intellect, that I declare that there is the cosmos, the origination of the cosmos, the cessation of the cosmos, and the path of practice leading to the cessation of the cosmos."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
Rasko
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:55 pm

Re: BASIS FOR KARMA / REBIRTH

Postby hop.pala » Tue Nov 26, 2013 4:49 pm

smcj wrote:Just a footnote; one definition for 'God' in christian thought is 'the uncaused cause'. In other words they don't have an answer to the infinite regression question of 'where did God come from', so they answer it by saying, in effect, that God caused himself. That of course is a paradox. Whereas the Buddhists simply say that there is an infinite regression, also a paradox. So either tradition's answer is a paradox.


http://propositionzen.wordpress.com/201 ... -the-enso/
hop.pala
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 3:48 am

PreviousNext

Return to Exploring Buddhism

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 8 guests

>