Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 6:10 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 144 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 12:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 589
Could someone please explain to me, in clear simple words, the Nagarjuna/Madhyamaka meaning of emptiness and the two truths?

Here's my current understanding:

At the level of relative truth, there is a real concrete world, filled with real concrete objects, in which real concrete things happen. It's the world most people believe is the only world, the real world.

At the level of absolute truth, there is only emptiness: phenomena with no inherent existence, intrinsic nature, ultimate essence. Absolute truth doesn't deny the existence of the world of objects, doesn't say it's all a grand illusion produced by mind; it only denies that these objects have inherent existence (i.e., that they are not subject to dependent origination).

_________________
neti neti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 589
One more:

Per Nagarjuna/Madhyamaka is there anything that DOES have intrinsic existence?

For example, emptiness. Or Buddha nature?

_________________
neti neti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 12:22 am 
Offline
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:58 pm
Posts: 3037
Location: Olympia WA
rachmiel wrote:
One more:

Per Nagarjuna/Madhyamaka is there anything that DOES have intrinsic existence?

For example, emptiness. Or Buddha nature?



My understanding is that Prasangika Madhymaka refutes the entire concept of svabhava. Shentong states that buddha nature/nirvana/whatever is svabhava, empty of other, not empty of itself. I'm sure there's a ton missing there, but on a basic level I think that's the dichotomy.

One thing seems to be though, alot of times criticism of this position seems to be centered on the mistaken idea that Nagarjuna was somehow a nihilist, who was saying "nothing exists"..there is no statement there advocating inherent non existence either..which would actually just be another kind of inherent existence.

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html

Pali Sutta obviously, but i've always found this short one to sum up nicely the idea that polarities of existence and non existence actually simply are not truth.

Paging Malcolm to bring the knowledge.

_________________
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull" -Tom Waits


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm
Posts: 1358
if you want i can send you the mulamadhyamakakarika by Nagarjuna to you via email or Skype. the Garfields version. it ought to be a good commentary also.

_________________
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm
Posts: 1358
i dont think you will get a really satisfying answer to the two truths via Dharmawheel. you need to study and experience it yourself.

_________________
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 8:31 am
Posts: 1934
Location: Sydney AU
I think your description is an accurate summary on the level of a general description of the topic. In other words, it explains the concept clearly enough. Where I think your issue is, revolves around the use of the word 'concrete'. Perhaps what you're trying to find is something to conceptualize as fundamental, something which can provide a foundation for one's sense of what exists.

I think what is at issue is finding that which is always so, which really is 'self-existent', that is, doesn't rely on anything else for its existence, the one 'true substance'. In the theistic traditions that might be Deity as the eternal ground of existence. I think the Buddhist approach is not to provide such resting place for the conceptual mind - not to provide a 'master concept' in terms of which everything else can be explained. It doesn't deny that there is one, but it does deny that it can be conceived as any particular entity or object of thought. Instead the task is always to understand how thought seeks to find some refuge in the notion of an absolute or something self-existent. That is why the Madhyamika employs the dialectical method to demonstrate that any such formulation is self-contradictory.

But at the same time, this doesn't deny the reality of karma and suffering. Even if we understand on the intellectual level that these things are ultimately non-existent, while they are still real for us, then we have to deal with them. That is the nature of the conventional reality which we're all part of.

_________________
Learn to do good, refrain from evil, purify the mind ~ this is the teaching of the Buddhas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 589
KonchokZoepa wrote:
if you want i can send you the mulamadhyamakakarika by Nagarjuna to you via email or Skype. the Garfields version. it ought to be a good commentary also.

Yes, please. (If it's legally sharable.) rachmiel at rachmiel dot org

Thanks! :-)

_________________
neti neti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 589
jeeprs wrote:
I think what is at issue is finding that which is always so, which really is 'self-existent', that is, doesn't rely on anything else for its existence, the one 'true substance'. In the theistic traditions that might be Deity as the eternal ground of existence. I think the Buddhist approach is not to provide such resting place for the conceptual mind - not to provide a 'master concept' in terms of which everything else can be explained. It doesn't deny that there is one, but it does deny that it can be conceived as any particular entity or object of thought.

So is the prevalent conclusion among Buddhists that (Buddha thought that) there IS in fact an eternal ground, but that it's too dangerous for the mind to believe that, so the entire issue is deemed moot? Or that there is no eternal ground? Or that no one can ever know with certainty if there is or isn't?

It sounds a bit like this to me:

There's this guy who's been to the other side of the hill outside his village. He meets with a bunch of villagers who have not been to the other side of the hill. The village, btw, is in dire need of fresh water. They ask him: "Is there a fresh-water lake on the other side of the hill?" Rather than saying yes or no to them, he spends all his time trying to get them to understand why they are asking the question in the first place.

_________________
neti neti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 589
Does this stand up in court?

-------------------------

One of the main assertions of Buddhism is impermanence: everything is constantly changing.

To try to observe the impermanence of the seemingly concrete, enduring objects in the world (of relative truth) is futile. Our sensorium is not sensitive enough to detect the micro-changes going on in a rock moment to moment.

But there is something whose constant change we *can* observe: the goings on in our mind. So, to observe impermanence in action, look no further than at your own mind.

_________________
neti neti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:58 am
Posts: 993
rachmiel wrote:
Does this stand up in court?

-------------------------

One of the main assertions of Buddhism is impermanence: everything is constantly changing.

To try to observe the impermanence of the seemingly concrete, enduring objects in the world (of relative truth) is futile. Our sensorium is not sensitive enough to detect the micro-changes going on in a rock moment to moment.

But there is something whose constant change we *can* observe: the goings on in our mind. So, to observe impermanence in action, look no further than at your own mind.


Isn't one of the issues for Buddhism that concepts tend to aim at permanence, so the universal idea, e.g. "cat", remains the same despite any actual experience of a particular cat?

(btw, nice site you have there)

_________________
we cannot get rid of God because we still believe in grammar - Nietzsche


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm
Posts: 1358
i tried to send it via email but it was too big file to be able to send it. skype is an option if you have skype.

_________________
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 589
KonchokZoepa wrote:
i tried to send it via email but it was too big file to be able to send it. skype is an option if you have skype.

Try emailing it to my gmail account: rachmiel7@gmail.com

Thanks.

_________________
neti neti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm
Posts: 1358
no i cant send the file, its too big to send via email. sorry

_________________
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:44 pm 
Online
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 10290
Location: Greece
Anohter option is Hotmail skydrive, it allows up to 7gb sharing for free. Another option is to upload it scribd. Another option is to open a dropbox account. Another option is...

_________________
"My religion is not deceiving myself."
Jetsun Milarepa 1052-1135 CE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm
Posts: 1358
i have dropbox but its full, skype is the easiest way since i dont want to create a hotmail account. actually i think i have it in dropbox. let me see. ill try to send it to you via dropbox.

_________________
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm
Posts: 1358
i sent the dropbox link to your gmail. let me know in this thread if you succeeded to download it.

thanks sherab dorje for opening up a door :thanks:

_________________
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:05 am
Posts: 589
Got it, thanks. :-)

_________________
neti neti


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:50 pm
Posts: 1358
no problem. happy to be of benefit :smile: :namaste:

_________________
If the thought of demons
Never rises in your mind,
You need not fear the demon hosts around you.
It is most important to tame your mind within....

In so far as the Ultimate, or the true nature of being is concerned,
there are neither buddhas or demons.
He who frees himself from fear and hope, evil and virtue,
will realize the insubstantial and groundless nature of confusion.
Samsara will then appear as the mahamudra itself….

-Milarepa

OMMANIPADMEHUNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls6P9tOYmdo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:48 pm
Posts: 963
Quote:
"rachmiel"]
So is the prevalent conclusion among Buddhists that (Buddha thought that) there IS in fact an eternal ground, but that it's too dangerous for the mind to believe that, so the entire issue is deemed moot? Or that there is no eternal ground? Or that no one can ever know with certainty if there is or isn't?

it is the conclusion that is taught in the Thrid Turning Sutras.
Since this eternal ground is inconceivable to the ordinary there is no way of knowing if there is or isn't something "beyond"
we just have to take the Buddha's word on it.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .nypo.html
36. "When a monk's mind is thus freed, O monks, neither the gods with Indra, nor the gods with Brahma, nor the gods with the Lord of Creatures (Pajaapati), when searching will find[36] on what the consciousness of one thus gone (tathaagata) is based. Why is that? One who has thus gone is no longer traceable here and now, so I say."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:48 pm
Posts: 963
rachmiel wrote:
Does this stand up in court?

-------------------------

One of the main assertions of Buddhism is impermanence: everything is constantly changing.

To try to observe the impermanence of the seemingly concrete, enduring objects in the world (of relative truth) is futile. Our sensorium is not sensitive enough to detect the micro-changes going on in a rock moment to moment.

But there is something whose constant change we *can* observe: the goings on in our mind. So, to observe impermanence in action, look no further than at your own mind.

Impermanence is not a good thing.
SN 22.46 Impermanent (2) pg 885 Ven Bodhi translation
At Savatthi. "Bhikkhus, form is impermanent.... Feeling is impermanent.... Preception is impermanent.... Volitional formations are impermanent.... Consciousness is impermanent. What is Impermanent is suffering. What is suffering is nonself. What is nonself should be seen as it really is with correct wisdom thus: This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 144 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group