Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Thu Dec 25, 2014 11:06 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Forum rules

Please click here to view the forum rules

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:03 am 

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Posts: 9

A thirsty man in the desert hopes to find water, not a chemistry text about water.
Speculating on your question will not be helpful in alleviating that which Buddhism is designed to alleviate, namely suffering, clinging to the impermanent as if it were permanent.

You already have many moments of awareness. The Buddhist practice is to increase those, through mindfulness, bringing oneself back to awareness over and over, untill one is able to use that refined awareness to examine its own nature.

When Buddha was asked speculative questions, he declined, not perhaps because he did not know the answer in realtive terms, but he declared such speculation " not conducive to awakening."

Even if you had a conclusive scientific "answer" it would not help you be happier.

best wishes to all


PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:03 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 3:53 am
Posts: 486
Graycomma wrote:

This is my first post in this forum. I havent searched through the forum yet.


Definitely not!

Awareness is a function of the mind. Brain and mind are not the same thing. The brain is material, a physical organ of the body whereas the mind is a formless entity possessing the qualities of clarity and knowing. Two very different things.

But there is an obvious and significant relationship between them and for the mind to function properly the brain also needs to be free of impairment or dysfunction.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:57 am 
Former staff member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 am
Posts: 2995
Location: British Columbia
On the other hand, if you remove someone's brain, you wouldn't expect them to be much fun at a party.

Just a nice Halloween thought. :)

Sergeant Schultz knew everything there was to know.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 4:22 pm 

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:54 pm
Posts: 5
ronnewmexico : So since all I see is self relationship not object itself any object that is perceivable such as a tree a ball or a brain is not that object itself that is being apprehended but the realtionship of that object to that which perceives object.....any per-oception is a creation of the interaction of the observor and observed and thusly in this sense a creation of the observor. So all observed in this context is a creation(apprehension) of the observor. So mind creates brain(object) in this context.

I understand it as subject-object continuum. or observer-observed duality.both appear and disappear togeather and since brain (object) appears when there is a questioner (observer) about the brain , it is the mind(observer) that creates brain.

approaching it logically I agree. But is there a observer when brain is dead.my question may be reflexive.
Probably you may refer me some good free books (english) on this topic.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot] and 8 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group