I read the transcript only, so accordingly I didn't get any cues of Dawkins' 'arrogance or frustration' or Pell's 'confident and calm' nature but based on their words alone
I thought that Dawkins was articulate and focused, and that Cardinal Pell seemed unable to respond to questions in any meaningful way. Pell's "revisionism" seemed to wash Catholicism away into a vague sludge, seemingly in order to evade certain questions where traditional Catholicism offers answers that are absurd and unacceptable to a modern audience. On words alone
, Pell was smashed like a crab.
"Do not force others, including children, by any means whatsoever, to adopt your views, whether by authority, threat, money, propaganda, or even education." - Ven. Thich Nhat Hanh
"The uprooting of identity is seen by the noble ones as pleasurable; but this contradicts what the whole world sees." (Snp 3.12)
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead" - Thomas Paine