Moderator: Tibetan Buddhism moderators
kirtu wrote:There are no actual secrets. The highest teaching is ultimate compassion
Individual wrote:If that is true, it seems to me that is the secret. If anybody including Tibetan Buddhists knew it, they would not take their Lamas and esoteric practices seriously. Not taking them as seriously, there would be no gain.
Hanzze wrote:remember "Kung Fu - Panda" there is no secret ingredientjust an empty paper and noodle soup made with heart

Individual wrote:Samaya vows and money, yes. I am already a slave to my own mind. I would gain nothing from being a slave to someone else.
PemaRigdzin wrote:You seem to really have a bone to pick with Vajrayana. Makes me wonder why you'd even be interested.
Individual wrote:If that is true, it seems to me that is the secret. If anybody including Tibetan Buddhists knew it, they would not take their Lamas and esoteric practices seriously. Not taking them as seriously, there would be no gain.
Individual wrote:kirtu wrote:There are no actual secrets. The highest teaching is ultimate compassionIndividual wrote:If that is true, it seems to me that is the secret. If anybody including Tibetan Buddhists knew it, they would not take their Lamas and esoteric practices seriously. Not taking them as seriously, there would be no gain.
Not sure if this is actually true. Because I vaguely remember reading a certain sectarian Chan monk writing a polemic attack on Tibetan Buddhism (which he called "Lamaism") where he made this same statement: that the rituals themselves are just expedient means, that the Lamas themselves really have no power, and the "secret mantra," is not something any of them could recite; the secret mantra is in the mind; Buddha-nature.
It is hard for me to believe any Tibetan Buddhist would agree with this. It is conceivable, though, that they might tell me this to make me disinterested.
kirtu wrote:Individual wrote:kirtu wrote:There are no actual secrets. The highest teaching is ultimate compassionIndividual wrote:If that is true, it seems to me that is the secret. If anybody including Tibetan Buddhists knew it, they would not take their Lamas and esoteric practices seriously. Not taking them as seriously, there would be no gain.
Not sure if this is actually true. Because I vaguely remember reading a certain sectarian Chan monk writing a polemic attack on Tibetan Buddhism (which he called "Lamaism") where he made this same statement: that the rituals themselves are just expedient means, that the Lamas themselves really have no power, and the "secret mantra," is not something any of them could recite; the secret mantra is in the mind; Buddha-nature.
It is hard for me to believe any Tibetan Buddhist would agree with this. It is conceivable, though, that they might tell me this to make me disinterested.
People can understand different things by what I have said. Ultimately esoteric Buddhism (Vajrayana) is not really esoteric. The highest teaching is Great Compassion - compassion for all beings everywhere and the ultimate wisdom of Buddhahood. Compassion is like a philosopher's stone from alchemy that transforms beings from being an ordinary being to setting them on the path to Buddhahood (Lama Kalsang and every other lama I have ever taken teachings from have said this). Wisdom is harder to get a handle on which is why we study Buddhist philosophy. And it is even harder to see the inseparability of wisdom and compassion.
As for compassion being the highest teaching many lamas have said this. It's just when we really get deeply into this we can find that things "get complex" because in a way sentient beings minds are complex although ultimately they are very simple - just being perfect wisdom and compassion and not even being two things - they are just the same thing. And going deeper we find they are not anything at all. But before we get there we are still prone to getting mad at others, generating and following desire and fear, and making the world miserable for ourselves and others in a misguided attempt to pursue pleasure and our own ignorant inclinations (for example at the end of this sexual desire arose once again in my mind - as a computer professional I get angry at the poor performance of software daily, etc.)
Tibetan Buddhist lamas would generally agree with this Chan monk as you have written his criticism: Buddhamind is the ultimate mantra (didn't HE Kalu Rinpoche say this word for word?), rituals do nothing at all in and of themselves - they are expedient means (but does that mean that they don't do anything?) , lamas have no power - well some lamas don't have obvious siddhi and the others don't show them off but to mean literally that lamas don't have power is wrong - they at least have some teaching that followed to it's conclusion will result in Buddhahood so that is the ultimate power - as Lama Phabonka says in comentary on Lama Tsongkapa's "The Principal Teachings of Buddhism" - don't tell me about flying or walking on the ceiling - the greatest miracle is transforming one negative thought ...
Also what I have written could be misunderstood because the teachings also say that you can have compassion without wisdom and wisdom without compassion. And also people get entranced with selflessness and emptiness. But what I mean is that ultimately perfected wisdom and perfected compassion are inseparable and the lamas tell us on Day 1 that compassion is the highest secret - it's just that we have to develop it to it's ultimate expression. In the ultimate expression of compassion you'd see that there is no actual self and other and that ultimate compassion is emptiness.
Kirt

Individual wrote:Samaya vows and money, yes. I am already a slave to my own mind. I would gain nothing from being a slave to someone else.
Individual wrote:A present?
kirtu wrote:There are no actual secrets. The highest teaching is ultimate compassion
Individual wrote:If that is true, it seems to me that is the secret. If anybody including Tibetan Buddhists knew it, they would not take their Lamas and esoteric practices seriously. Not taking them as seriously, there would be no gain.
Individual wrote:Because I vaguely remember reading a certain sectarian Chan monk writing a polemic attack on Tibetan Buddhism (which he called "Lamaism") where he made this same statement: that the rituals themselves are just expedient means, that the Lamas themselves really have no power, and the "secret mantra," is not something any of them could recite; the secret mantra is in the mind; Buddha-nature.
It is hard for me to believe any Tibetan Buddhist would agree with this. It is conceivable, though, that they might tell me this to make me disinterested.

Luke wrote:If you resent the thought of having deep devotion to a teacher, then Vajrayana may not be for you because guru devotion is really the heart of Vajrayana.
Pema Rigdzin wrote:Particularly my two main lamas who, were brothers and always taught together

Individual wrote:Let's say I go to all the Lamas out there with the following request:
"I wish to know all your secrets, without having any obligations."
Which Lamas would say yes?
If none, then of all the Lamas that don't simply say, "No," which Lama(s) would be most likely to give me an interesting and useful answer?
Pema Rigdzin wrote:Luke wrote:If you resent the thought of having deep devotion to a teacher, then Vajrayana may not be for you because guru devotion is really the heart of Vajrayana.
This idea of devotion in Vajrayana is such a misunderstood thing. I think many people like Individual that can't get down with this "devotion" business assume it's intended that one should meet a teacher that resonates with one and then just try to start fabricating some devotion to the teacher because that's the only way the magic works. I suppose there have been so many different kinds of cults exposed over the decades where some sort of baseless, mindless devotion was demanded of the followers that this misunderstanding isn't so surprising, but it's not how devotion in tantric Buddhism works. I'll give an example of how devotion to my teachers began to arise in me. Particularly my two main lamas who, were brothers and always taught together (I say "were" and "taught" because one of them has since passed away). They were so positive, so patient, so full of clearly uncontrived joy, so giving (constantly traveling and teaching endlessly all day long for days and seeing students privately who'd asked for interviews for personal guidance, and all the time these lamas are never asking for anything - at teachings, long-time students who'd taken on a leadership role at their different centers would request that we make some meager donation to cover the costs of the Rinpoches' expenses and a tiny bit extra as a small token of our appreciation, which has always been traditional in Buddhism)... They basically just embodied love and compassion and generosity and joy and wisdom, and that was the core of what they were teaching, although all the while the Dzogchen view was also being introduced very inconspicuously (and I didn't even know what Dzogchen was at that time anyway)... Before I'd experienced for myself any of the truth of what they taught about mind and reality, I already knew that at the very least, these two men - vivid embodiments of love, joy, and wisdom - were exactly how I aspired to be.
Over time, as I put to practice the teachings they taught us, and I gained experiential understanding (nothing so profound, but just real because I'd experienced it and not just believed in it), and that personal experience began to reduce my own suffering and make me want to help others (at least in a worldly sense in line with my limited capacity), my appreciation and thankfulness to my lamas and to the Dharma, and therefore the Three Jewels, just kept sprouting and growing naturally... I've also seen many times how advice they gave me that I didn't immediately understand or which was kind of differing from what I wanted to hear eventually came in very handy as situations in my life arose that were very particular and to which the advice I'd receive not long before suddenly seemed very relevant. Like they knew how my life would develop in a very specialized way, not vague or general at all, and they gave advice from that view of things. This has happened many times and I have never been prone to magical thinking... I came to Buddhism very skeptical, actually. So all of this devotion arose and developed very organically and gradually, and as it increased, my meditation deepened and I began to feel tapped in to some wisdom on some level that was guiding me, always leading me in the right direction... impossible to say whether it's mine or my lamas. I really feel like it's a confluence of the two... that as I begin to recognize in myself what I've seen in my lamas all along, my own wisdom is uncovered little by little. That's how it works. One doesn't become a slave to anyone. If one practices correctly and diligently, one begins to cease to be a slave to one's ego and pride, though.
If one practices correctly and diligently, one begins to cease to be a slave to one's ego and pride, though.

conebeckham wrote:We're all attention seeking and attention getting....all of us.
But some of us are merely proliferating concepts of our own and foisting them out there, while others at least are trying to work with the teachings they've been given, trying to learn, and likely there's a bit of "good motivation" mixed in there somewhere as well, for some of us. You know, working together to further our mutual understanding......

conebeckham wrote:We're all attention seeking and attention getting....all of us.
But some of us are merely proliferating concepts of our own and foisting them out there, while others at least are trying to work with the teachings they've been given, trying to learn, and likely there's a bit of "good motivation" mixed in there somewhere as well, for some of us. You know, working together to further our mutual understanding......
Individual wrote:Sometimes, it does feel like a subconscious sense of mischief underlies some of the stuff I do and say.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests