Dharma Wheel

A Buddhist discussion forum on Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism
It is currently Thu Dec 25, 2014 1:10 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12737
Indrajala wrote:

Humour isn't a sin. You should be able to laugh at Hyecho and his silly remark.



Humor is not a sin; bringing up that citation in the context this discussion shows an appalling lack of proportion.


Quote:
Jeff, you need to study the history of Central Asia a little more carefully: it is certain that this monk's view of Tibetans was
Quote:
jaundiced by the fact that Tibetans (from Lhasa) held sovereignty over large swaths of Central Asia.



Sure, but the Tang history gives detailed observations of the Tibetan culture and habits at the time. Hyecho isn't my only source.


Consider the source: the Chinese have had nothing good to say about Tibetans since Minister Gar tricked the emperor out of his prized daughter.




Quote:
Naw. I just counter the overzealous hype over Tibet.


No, Jeff -- your participation here was not countering any overzealous hype about Tibet. Anyone reading the thread can see this. What anyone can also see is that someone who claims to be Buddhist monk is casting racist aspersions about Tibetans, which they should not do, just as they should not invent and spread racist myths about Muslims -- which unfortunately happens in Tibet these days a lot. Tibetans happen to be very racist people in general. So when I hear racist things coming out of the mouths of Tibetans about westerners, or Muslims or Chinese people I become equally annoyed.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:24 am
Posts: 275
Malcolm wrote:

Conditions in India are different -- it is hot, people are much hairier -- Tibetans have virtually no body hair in general.


Hey buddy, this is racial stereotyping!

I don't appreciate the blatant racism that you displayed in that post.


:tongue:

_________________
Many meditators know how to meditate,
But only a few know how to dismantle [mental clinging].
- Je Gyare


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 408
I'd like to take discussion of Tibet's material civilization and turn toward the topic of this thread. I think what we can reasonably agree on is that Tibetan people for the most part have lived very simple material lives. Given the Chinese invasion, does that make it more or less likely that the Tibetan people can be subjugated? People who tend to be independent and don't have much need for "stuff" might be pretty hard to manipulate. If it is true that Buddhism is the primary integrating aspect of Tibetan culture, it is no wonder that China wants to eradicate Buddhism in Tibet.

At the level of indoctrination and control, the best place to do it is with children. I have heard that schools are not allowed to teach Tibetan but must instead teach Chinese. Also, if China can get people to want "stuff", then those people naturally become more compliant and integrated Chinese materialist norms.

Earlier Malcolm mentioned the word siege in reference to institutional buddhism. The implicit concern that the subject of this tread points to is the continued siege by the Chinese on the Tibetan identity. From the limited info I have, coming from documentaries and such, is that, on the whole, Tibetans are losing via a war of attrition. Is there really any serious hope that the Tibetan people, and the Dharma, can survive the Chinese onslaught? It would actually be nice to hear some "ground truth" from people who have insight into what is going on in Tibet these days. But maybe it's such a sensitive topic no one in the know wants to share what they know.

_________________
All things are unworthy of clinging to (sabbe dhammā nâla abhinivesāyā). --Buddha
If there is clinging, you do not have the view. --Drakpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:24 am
Posts: 275
JKhedrup wrote:

To be frank I am surprised you would quote such a source and give it so much credence.


:stirthepot:

There is some credence to what Indrajala brought up though. Looking at the Incan civilization, we see that they developed running water, baths, etc. within similar conditions (of the Tibetans) in the Andes mountians....

http://enperublog.com/2009/07/08/surprising-water-engineering-at-machu-picchu/

http://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g294314-d553950-Reviews-Inca_Baths_at_Tambomachay-Cusco_Cusco_Region.html

_________________
Many meditators know how to meditate,
But only a few know how to dismantle [mental clinging].
- Je Gyare


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:25 am
Posts: 100
Malcolm wrote:
brendan wrote:

I understand western civilizations so called achievements are not a manifestation of "right view" and could be seen as being demonic.


You are making an idiot of yourself by such declarations.



Why? climate change seems to be a direct result of our progress.

Also were does one draw the line on merit accumulating activity. Surely wanting to look after ones citizens while in harmony with the earth are such actions providing one has right view and bodhichitta.

You cant make a comparison with western civilisation due to there being no claims of Realised Masters or Dharma in these civilisations. As opposed to the Tibetan civilisation claims many through its history.

Like I typed earlier (not that my point means much) I have lived and still do with native Tibetans and most of them agree, some argue this quite strongly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:05 pm
Posts: 160
Lotus_Bitch wrote:
JKhedrup wrote:

To be frank I am surprised you would quote such a source and give it so much credence.


:stirthepot:

There is some credence to what Indrajala brought up though. Looking at the Incan civilization, we see that they developed running water, baths, etc. within similar conditions (of the Tibetans) in the Andes mountians.... ]

So, if Tibet had just had Llamas and coca leaves instead of Lamas and butter tea they would probably have made toilets their great civilizational mission instead of Buddhism? ;)
Image
Best wishes
Lars


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12737
brendan wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
brendan wrote:

I understand western civilizations so called achievements are not a manifestation of "right view" and could be seen as being demonic.


You are making an idiot of yourself by such declarations.



Why? climate change seems to be a direct result of our progress.



There is no teaching in the Dharma that declares useful things "demonic" or somehow lacking "right view".

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12737
Lotus_Bitch wrote:
JKhedrup wrote:

To be frank I am surprised you would quote such a source and give it so much credence.


:stirthepot:

There is some credence to what Indrajala brought up though. Looking at the Incan civilization, we see that they developed running water, baths, etc. within similar conditions (of the Tibetans) in the Andes mountians....

http://enperublog.com/2009/07/08/surprising-water-engineering-at-machu-picchu/

http://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g294314-d553950-Reviews-Inca_Baths_at_Tambomachay-Cusco_Cusco_Region.html


Actually, there is major difference between Tibet and the Andes: water. Water was never in shortage in Tibet. A major river runs right through the center of the country fed by smaller rives on both sides. Tibetan "urban" civilization was entirely clustered around rivers. Indeed, it is supposed that the Zhang Zhung civilization centered around Kailash collapsed because of climate change, pushing the Zhang Zhung tribes into lower part of the what is the modern day TAR where there was more water.

The Andes, by comparison, are really quite dry, so water is much more of an issue for the Incas.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:25 am
Posts: 100
Malcolm wrote:
brendan wrote:
[quote="Malcolm

I understand western civilizations so called achievements are not a manifestation of "right view" and could be seen as being demonic.


You are making an idiot of yourself by such declarations.



Why? climate change seems to be a direct result of our progress.
[/quote]


There is no teaching in the Dharma that declares useful things "demonic" or somehow lacking "right view".[/quote]

I understand that and thanks for highlighting it, but your view on this seems to be contradictory.

How can you type that but also claim there were social advancements in pre-PRC Tibetan civilisation equal to that of western civilisation who had no Realized Masters or Dharma.

I understand that and thanks for highlighting it, but your view on this seems to be potatoes-potatoes.

Also our progress is still harming the environment in an aggressive and violent way (I understand there have also been major benefits).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 3:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12737
brendan wrote:
How can you type that but also claim there were social advancements in pre-PRC Tibetan civilisation equal to that of western civilisation who had no Realized Masters or Dharma.



This has nothing at all do with the whether there are more realized Tibetan masters in Tibet or India.

There are more realized Buddha masters (of Vajrayāna) with the borders of Tibet than without. I was not making any sort of claim about Indian civilization, Tibetan Cvilization, Western Civilization and so on. You were the one who introduced this into the discussion.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 3:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:24 am
Posts: 275
Malcolm wrote:
Lotus_Bitch wrote:

Actually, there is major difference between Tibet and the Andes: water. Water was never in shortage in Tibet. A major river runs right through the center of the country fed by smaller rives on both sides. Tibetan "urban" civilization was entirely clustered around rivers. Indeed, it is supposed that the Zhang Zhung civilization centered around Kailash collapsed because of climate change, pushing the Zhang Zhung tribes into lower part of the what is the modern day TAR where there was more water.

The Andes, by comparison, are really quite dry, so water is much more of an issue for the Incas.


I don't think you could generalize about the Andes like that, the altiplano sure, but even then there's the Apurimac river to the West of Cusco with the Urubamba flanking East also.

_________________
Many meditators know how to meditate,
But only a few know how to dismantle [mental clinging].
- Je Gyare


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:19 am
Posts: 12737
Lotus_Bitch wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
Lotus_Bitch wrote:

Actually, there is major difference between Tibet and the Andes: water. Water was never in shortage in Tibet. A major river runs right through the center of the country fed by smaller rives on both sides. Tibetan "urban" civilization was entirely clustered around rivers. Indeed, it is supposed that the Zhang Zhung civilization centered around Kailash collapsed because of climate change, pushing the Zhang Zhung tribes into lower part of the what is the modern day TAR where there was more water.

The Andes, by comparison, are really quite dry, so water is much more of an issue for the Incas.


I don't think you could generalize about the Andes like that, the altiplano sure, but even then there's the Apurimac river to the West of Cusco with the Urubamba flanking East also.



There is nothing in Andes that resembles the Tsangpo river.

_________________
http://www.atikosha.org
http://www.bhaisajya.net
http://www.bhaisajya.guru
http://www.sakyapa.net
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔

How can you not practice the highest Dharma
at this time of obtaining a perfect human body?

-- Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group