Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

User avatar
LynyrdSkynyrd
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:10 am
Location: Pure Land

Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby LynyrdSkynyrd » Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:26 am


User avatar
eijo
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:44 am
Location: Koyasan, Japan

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby eijo » Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:20 am

Regarding any details of that site, you need to contact them directly.

I can give you what I understand of the situation.

The first license mentioned above is formal qualification as a priest. Those who receive it must take and pass rigorous written and practical tests, and have already completed the four part training, shido kegyo 四度加行, and have received abhiseka permitting advanced study, Denbo Kanjo 傳法灌頂, among other requirements.

This qualification permits a priest to formally become the head of a formally recognized temple.

The cost refers to people who train privately at recognized temples. It is waived for those who train at seminary schools in Koyasan.

The "Maha acarya" mentioned is fully called a Dento Dai-Ajari 傳燈大阿闍梨. Only a person with that rank can formally teach praxis in Koyasan. It is received by special admission and at least another ten years of study after Denbo Kanjo including formal debate, and after receiving the highest abhiseka of Shingon, which is only given once in ten+ years.

A person with the above priest licensing, and who is the head of a formally recognized temple, but without the title of Dento Dai-Ajari, is also permitted to teach certain parts of the curriculum, typically shido kegyo, in that temple. This applies everywhere in Japan outside of Koyasan, and also abroad. Further teaching may also be permitted abroad, by exception.

Only a Dento Dai-Ajari can give abhiseka in Shingon, and in principal only such a person can teach the entire Shingon curriculum or the advanced parts. This applies worldwide, not just Koyasan. However, due to the rarity of such persons exceptions may be made abroad, but abhiseka cannot be a part of those exceptions.

The 16 clerical ranks you mention are not in any way related to teaching credentials.

Dento Dai-Ajari are indeed rare outside of Japan. I am the only non-Japanese to have received this title to date.

I hope this clears things up for you.

User avatar
dearreader
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:12 am
Location: Europa

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby dearreader » Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:16 am

"Inscribed with the brush of Mt. Sumeru and the ink of the seas,
Heaven-and-earth itself is the sutra book.
All phenomena are encompassed in even a single point therein,
And the six sense objects are all included within its covers."
-Kukai, translated in Kukai on the Philosophy of Language by Takagi and Dreitlein

User avatar
LynyrdSkynyrd
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:10 am
Location: Pure Land

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby LynyrdSkynyrd » Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:27 pm


User avatar
eijo
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:44 am
Location: Koyasan, Japan

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby eijo » Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:40 pm

I'm not sure how to answer your counterfactual question, and I don't know anything about the Shingon temple in the UK.

If your question is how are ordination and abhiseka different in esoteric Buddhism, then that's addressable.

Exoteric Buddhism does not have abhiseka (although it is mentioned in some exoteric sutras), only ordination and whatever other training a school may have.

Abhiseka is of the highest importance in esoteric Buddhism. Without it, you haven't studied esoteric Buddhism.

Ordination comes at the beginning of a priest's training in Shingon. It is the first thing that you receive. It is called tokudo 得度 in Japanese. It means you are ready to begin training. Even though you are technically a priest at this point, you still have a very long way to go. You certainly are not a teacher yet. You cannot run a temple. You can't do much of anything except study and train. ;)

Abhiseka is of several varieties. It is sometimes called empowerment, initiation, etc. It is called kanjo 灌頂 in Japanese. The most common kinds are given below. Ordination is required for all of these except the first one.

(1) There is the abhiseka open to all without any prerequisites or commitments for laypeople called kechien kanjo 結緣灌頂, given for example at Koyasan twice a year to anyone. This is for establishing a connection with one of the two mandalas. No specific practice is given.

(2) There is the abhiseka given with samaya for a single deity, providing one mudra and mantra. This is called jumyo kanjo 受明灌頂. This is only given today to certain priests under a certain specific set of conditions, such as advanced age not permitting fulfillment of the prerequisites in (3). There are some limited prerequisites. This permits only the practice of the single deity received.

(3) There is the abhiseka with samaya that permits study of the advanced teachings called dembo kanjo 傳法灌頂. This is given every year. The prerequisite is completion of the deity yoga in four parts called shido kegyo 四度加行. This takes place over an grueling and intensive 100-day retreat. A person is styled an ajari 阿闍梨 (teacher) after receiving this abhiseka, but in actuality is not yet ready to teach by any means without further years of study and practice. This person is now ready to study properly and receive deeper instructions. A person who receives this can operate a recognized temple upon taking and passing the qualifying test mentioned above. A person who passes that test and has a registered temple can teach up to shido kegyo at that temple. (Note that running a temple and teaching are treated as two different things.)

(4) The abhiseka for a master teacher is called gakushu kanjo 學習灌頂. This is given once in 10+ years. A person who receives this is called a Dento Dai-Ajari 傳燈大阿闍梨. I explained this already above.

I will abbreviate the other and very rare kinds of abhiseka. There is one given only once in 30 years for example.

I hope this answers your question.

User avatar
eijo
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:44 am
Location: Koyasan, Japan

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby eijo » Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:00 pm


User avatar
LynyrdSkynyrd
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:10 am
Location: Pure Land

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby LynyrdSkynyrd » Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:46 pm


User avatar
eijo
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:44 am
Location: Koyasan, Japan

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby eijo » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:14 pm

They cannot simply be bought, and they surely mean quite a lot to the many people interested in them. They could be seen as indicating seniority given the years requirement, but not necessarily since its not necessary to pursue them.

User avatar
LynyrdSkynyrd
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:10 am
Location: Pure Land

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby LynyrdSkynyrd » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:16 pm

Wonderful, thank you for the clarification. I deeply appreciate it.

DrLang
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:06 pm

Re: Lisence to Teach vs Maha Acarya?

Postby DrLang » Fri Oct 25, 2013 12:43 am

Thank you Rev. Eijo. As someone who is hoping to find a willing teacher, this is highly informative.


Return to “Shingon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests