Kim O'Hara wrote:I'm sorry, Miaitu, but your document is neither scientific nor a proof. At most, it is a record of an observation accompanied by an unsupported hypothesis.
Perhaps you can compare it with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method#Elements_of_the_scientific_method to see what else it needs to contain?
Green5 wrote:dharmagoat wrote:"Energy" in this context is not even a scientific term. No need to read on.
Good remark. How should we call it?
Users browsing this forum: dhammafriend and 16 guests